Criterion Blu-ray

News on Criterion and Janus Films
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

#601 Post by MichaelB »

In which case I think we can assume all Criterions will be Region A unless otherwise confirmed.

Oh well, we've always got the BFI and MoC on this side of the pond...
User avatar
skuhn8
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 8:46 pm
Location: Chico, CA

#602 Post by skuhn8 »

Narshty wrote:No, they're doing it automatically to everything nowadays and have been since about 2006 (even to Janus titles).
Probably posted elsewhere, but this is from the yesterday's Criterion Collection bulletin:
Are Criterion's Blu-ray discs region-encoded?

Yes. Criterion is licensed to sell most of its editions only in North America.
User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

#603 Post by MichaelB »

This was presumably the case before 2006, when region-free was the norm (with a few exceptions), but I suspect what's happening now is that Criterion are licensing their HD masters to foreign distributors - so it would make a lot of commercial sense to pre-emptively region-code their releases to avoid appearing to encroach on other territories.

So it makes perfect business sense (HD masters are far more expensive, so they've got to recoup their expenses somehow), even if it's extremely annoying for those of us who are locked into Region B.
User avatar
skuhn8
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 8:46 pm
Location: Chico, CA

#604 Post by skuhn8 »

MichaelB wrote:This was presumably the case before 2006, when region-free was the norm (with a few exceptions), but I suspect what's happening now is that Criterion are licensing their HD masters to foreign distributors - so it would make a lot of commercial sense to pre-emptively region-code their releases to avoid appearing to encroach on other territories.

So it makes perfect business sense (HD masters are far more expensive, so they've got to recoup their expenses somehow), even if it's extremely annoying for those of us who are locked into Region B.
I understand that Blu-ray players are hackable as SD DVD players. So there's always that option. I'm still holding off until the new gen players come out (and I haven't been following those developments so don't know when that'll be) but bought an upscaling standard dvd player when I bought a new plasma two weeks ago. Am in a bit of a purchasing limbo regards dvds as I'm trying to get a future strategy sorted.
User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

#605 Post by MichaelB »

skuhn8 wrote:I understand that Blu-ray players are hackable as SD DVD players. So there's always that option. I'm still holding off until the new gen players come out (and I haven't been following those developments so don't know when that'll be) but bought an upscaling standard dvd player when I bought a new plasma two weeks ago. Am in a bit of a purchasing limbo regards dvds as I'm trying to get a future strategy sorted.
My strategy involved a 42" plasma, an Oppo 983 and a PS3, which seemed the most cost-effective way of getting the best quality picture in as multiregion a way as possible, but it does unavoidably lock me into Region B when it comes to Blu-Ray.

The Oppo gets used 95% of the time (believe the hype: it's a phenomenal player), but I need to be Blu-Ray compatible by the autumn for professional reasons, so I didn't have much choice.

But hopefully someone will crack the region situation before too long - next year sometime, with any luck.
User avatar
fiddlesticks
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 12:19 am
Location: Borderlands

#606 Post by fiddlesticks »

In an effort to keep this thread on-topic (and to help atone for my past sins in helping it go off-topic in the first place), I've responded to these posts in the Technical Issues and Questions thread.
User avatar
cgray
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 6:21 pm
Location: Erie, CO

#607 Post by cgray »

hammock wrote:
Svevan wrote:
kekid wrote:I do not understand why Criterion would eliminate English subtitles from some of the Blu Ray editions. They are at pains to tell their consumers they will not have any features in Blu Ray editions that are not replicated in standard editions. Clearly the converse is not true, and it cannot be explained away simply as a rights issue.
They're running out of space.
The subs are approximately 1MB per language so I seriously doubt that is the reason. Actually this single information will stop me from buying their BD's and another PS3 (US edition) to be able to play them. What a bummer!
I had written awhile ago (concerned, as I almost always watch even English titles with subs, for some reason), and got this back today:
jon mulvaney wrote:All of our Criterion and Eclipse DVDs (apart from a handful of our earliest releases) have optional English subtitles, and our Blu-ray discs will have them too.

I hope this helps, and thanks for your email!

Best,

Jon Mulvaney
User avatar
hammock
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:52 pm
Location: www.criteriondungeon.com
Contact:

#608 Post by hammock »

jon mulvaney wrote:All of our Criterion and Eclipse DVDs (apart from a handful of our earliest releases) have optional English subtitles, and our Blu-ray discs will have them too.
Thanks for sharing this - the best information I received in years!
User avatar
Abulafia
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 4:44 am
Location: The Banana Republic

#609 Post by Abulafia »

In which case I think we can assume all Criterions will be Region A unless otherwise confirmed.

Oh well, we've always got the BFI and MoC on this side of the pond.
Surely this is shooting themselves in the foot (CC that is). Although perhaps foreign sales (i.e. outside the US and Canada) don't account for a large percentage of their turnover?

Purchasing CC titles from the US, however, is often a hell of a lot cheaper than purchasing MOC and BFI titles from the UK. Moreover, who says the coverage of titles will be similar, and living in Aus means that many of these titles just simply won't be available, or won't be in additions reaching the quality of those companies outside the local market.

Certainly frustrating, though on the flipside how long can it be before region free or all region players flood the market. Let's just hope you don't have to sell a kidney to afford one as the case currently seems to be.
User avatar
Morbii
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 7:38 am

#610 Post by Morbii »

Abulafia wrote:
In which case I think we can assume all Criterions will be Region A unless otherwise confirmed.

Oh well, we've always got the BFI and MoC on this side of the pond...
Surely this is shooting themselves in the foot (CC that is).
Acutally, I imagine that not doing it would be shooting themselves in the foot as their distributors might not license to them otherwise.
User avatar
Abulafia
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 4:44 am
Location: The Banana Republic

#611 Post by Abulafia »

Acutally, I imagine that not doing it would be shooting themselves in the foot as their distributors might not license to them otherwise.
I see your point. But are not many of their releases from the Janus catalogue? Surely, here, it would be a case of engendering displeasure in possible licensees. Honestly, though, how many 'hardcore' DVD/Blu Ray purchasing cinephiles would not be aware of the internet, CC or other international brands. My point is that Joe Blow is hardly going to walk into Ezydvd or JBs (in Aus) stumble across Godard or Ozu or Bresson, etc, and think "I might blind buy that." How much could possible licencees be offering, compared with terminating your international sales (assuming of course that those international sales are at least somewhat significant).
User avatar
Morbii
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 7:38 am

#612 Post by Morbii »

Hmm, that's a good point about the Janus catalogue. Perhaps with the Janus titles they've found that they make more money licensing or something?
PillowRock
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:54 am

#613 Post by PillowRock »

Morbii wrote:Perhaps with the Janus titles they've found that they make more money licensing or something?
That simply translates to: The difference between licensing exclusive Blu rights in each zone and non exclusive rights (which is essentially what they would have to do if they were selling non-region-locked copies themselves) is greater than the profit margin that they would expect to see on their international sales of the products produced for the North American market.
User avatar
Morbii
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 7:38 am

#614 Post by Morbii »

PillowRock wrote:
Morbii wrote:Perhaps with the Janus titles they've found that they make more money licensing or something?
That simply translates to: The difference between licensing exclusive Blu rights in each zone and non exclusive rights (which is essentially what they would have to do if they were selling non-region-locked copies themselves) is greater than the profit margin that they would expect to see on their international sales of the products produced for the North American market.
That's pretty much what I said, except that with Janus titles I'm guessing they don't need to negotiate any sort of rights for the non-exclusive.
PillowRock
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:54 am

#615 Post by PillowRock »

Morbii wrote:except that with Janus titles I'm guessing they don't need to negotiate any sort of rights for the non-exclusive.
What I meant was:
They can sell licenses to *other* Blu producers in *other* regions.
If Criterion is already selling non-region locked disks of the movie in question, then *those* licenses sold to *other* producers must be nonexclusive.
If Criterion's disks are coded as Region A, then *those* other licenses can be exclusive.
The license fees for the exclusive version of the license will bring in more money for Janus.

That's the difference in licensing fees that I was talking about; the ones the that they stand to receive, not ones they would be paying. And that is what I was comparing to the profits from Criterion's potential foreign sales.

Sorry if what I meant wasn't clear before.
kekid
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:55 am

#616 Post by kekid »

I have noted that Amazon.com is selling the Criterion Blu Rays for $27.95 (list price $39.95). The Criterion exchange program requires the owner of the previous disk to send back that disk and pay $20 plus shipping. This does not seem like a good deal to me. By the time we account for shipping, we are getting $5 for the old disk. I would rather give it to a friend as a gift. If the intention was to encourage consumers to buy the SD versions rather than wait for the BD, this will not do it. For example, buying Salo now from Amazon and upgrading it later for $20 would mean a total cost of about $50 for the BD. Only uninformed consumers would see this as a fair incentive to go for the SD now and upgrade to BD later. I do not see any good argument for them not to have issued Salo in both formats at the same time and (as promised) at the same price.
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

#617 Post by swo17 »

I also noticed that Amazon is asking 4 cents less for the Blu-rays than the SDs. Now there's really no reason not to go Blu!

Seriously though, that exchange program really won't work. Maybe if they lower the price to $10 each. Maybe. Otherwise, the only reason I can see for participating is if you want the extras on the SD. For example, buying the SD of Last Emperor, and then upgrading the theatrical version of the film to Blu-ray yields you the best of both worlds. And for only, um, $60 or so. Hmmm... :?
User avatar
Cash Flagg
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 3:15 am

#618 Post by Cash Flagg »

swo17 wrote:I'm sure there is a perfectly rational explanation for all of these omissions. Someone should ask Criterion. (I would, but they don't ever seem to respond to my emails.)
Mulvaney email wrote:It is a text error on the site; the "Moving Pictures" episode supplement will be on both SD & BD releases. We will correct the page shortly.
User avatar
denti alligator
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:36 am
Location: "born in heaven, raised in hell"

#619 Post by denti alligator »

kekid wrote:The Criterion exchange program requires the owner of the previous disk to send back that disk and pay $20 plus shipping. This does not seem like a good deal to me.
I'm sorry, but I seem to have missed this announcement. Can you post the details, preferably with a link.. Thanks.
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

#620 Post by swo17 »

denti alligator wrote:
kekid wrote:The Criterion exchange program requires the owner of the previous disk to send back that disk and pay $20 plus shipping. This does not seem like a good deal to me.
I'm sorry, but I seem to have missed this announcement. Can you post the details, preferably with a link.
The details are mentioned earlier in this thread, or else here.
User avatar
Darth Lavender
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 6:24 pm

#621 Post by Darth Lavender »

Cash Flagg wrote:
Mulvaney email wrote:It is a text error on the site; the "Moving Pictures" episode supplement will be on both SD & BD releases. We will correct the page shortly.
Hooray! This is back to being a Day 1 purchase. :D
User avatar
Max von Mayerling
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 10:02 pm
Location: Ann Arbor, MI

#622 Post by Max von Mayerling »

It seems to me that they're being pretty upfront about the Criterion strategy. There will be no avalanche of Blu Ray reissues. And, perhaps more importantly, on the new releases, it sounds like if it doesn't hit the street Blu Ray, we shouldn't hold our breath waiting. For example, it seems highly unlikely that we'll see a Vampyr or La Ronde Blu Ray anytime soon. Like it or not, I appreciate the fact that they tried to clarify their approach.
User avatar
Jun-Dai
監督
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 8:34 am
Location: London, UK
Contact:

#623 Post by Jun-Dai »

The Criterion exchange program requires the owner of the previous disk to send back that disk and pay $20 plus shipping. This does not seem like a good deal to me.
I think the idea is not so much that it's supposed to be a good deal as it's probably they can run the exchange program in a cost-effective manner. If it were $10 per disc, they'd probably lose a fair amount of money on the arrangement, but for $20 they probably calculated to break even. Also, while it doesn't make so much sense individually, might it make sense if you bundle together 5 or 10 titles? For someone that's determined to upgrade, it might be cheaper and easier that way.
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

#624 Post by swo17 »

I hadn't thought about bundling. I don't think it's clear what the shipping charges would be if you were to exchange more than one at a time. Someone should ask.

I understand that Criterion needs to break even on the transaction. But the fact remains that the price of the whole new Blu-ray from an independent retailer can be severely discounted, while the $25 fee from Criterion is non-negotiable. DVDPriceSearch already shows a retailer asking just $23.95 for the BD of Bottle Rocket (and just a few dollars more than this for the other titles). Given this, I don't know why anyone wouldn't just buy the new BD version and sell their old SD copy, again, unless they wanted to keep something (like a booklet, or the TV version of Last Emperor) that the BD is lacking.
Narshty
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:27 pm
Location: London, UK

#625 Post by Narshty »

They've probably not worked out the specifics yet.

I think it's a fine idea though - allowing people to hang onto their thick booklets and novel reprints without having to duplicate. What happens if you only submit the first disc of The Last Emperor boxset though?
Post Reply