Page 5 of 13

Re: Cannes 2011

Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 5:30 am
by Nothing
Can't abide Sorrentino's work and this looks to be no different.

Re: Cannes 2011

Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 1:30 pm
by Alan Smithee
beh. The IMDB synopsis makes it sound like a revenge story. Much like that Tree of Life clip, you can't judge a movie from a minute long clip.

Re: Cannes 2011

Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 3:43 pm
by Finch
Bradshaw on Midnight in Paris

Re: Cannes 2011

Posted: Thu May 12, 2011 1:42 am
by ianungstad
Reviews for Midnight in Paris and Sleeping Beauty are pouring in.

The general consensus on Midnight in Paris seems to be that it's light fare but an above average outing from Woody Allen. A lot of comparisons to The Purple Rose of Cairo.

Sleeping Beauty got very poor reviews from The Hollywood Reporter and Variety. Even the more positive reviews (ex. Indiewire) admit that the film has some pretty major problems. Most of the reviews note that the characters are obtuse and one dimensional and the film's emotional punches tend to fall flat. Sounds like a turkey.

Re: Cannes 2011

Posted: Thu May 12, 2011 8:53 am
by Finch
French director Robert Guédiguian won't be watching Midnight in Paris because he objects to Carla Bruni's cameo and the fact that Allen shook hands with her controversial clown president husband. Of all the reasons to not watch the picture, this has got to be the stupidest.

Re: Cannes 2011

Posted: Thu May 12, 2011 8:57 am
by Finch
Instant reaction on Kevin from Time Out's Dave Calhoun
Lynne Ramsay's We Need To Talk About Kevin v strong. Powerful. Top photography. Swinton mesmerising. Provocative. V creepy turn from boy.
Glenn Heath from Slant on Midnight in Paris, Bellflower & Sleeping Beauty

Re: Cannes 2011

Posted: Thu May 12, 2011 9:35 am
by Nothing
it would appear that the world has ended - the British press like the new Lynne Ramsay film ;) Still, if this can help folks forget about Andrea Arnold then I'm all for it.

Although it's doubtful whether the film deserved a competition place, I would take the Variety / THR reviews of Sleeping Beauty with a pinch of salt also - they're both approaching things from an extremely limited commercial (and uptight) perspective. Where's Todd McCarthy when you need him?

Snowtown sounds sort-of interesting, although I am dicouraged by the thought of yet another handheld camera.

Re: Cannes 2011

Posted: Thu May 12, 2011 11:17 am
by Finch
Kevin press conference (contains spoilerish discussion of the final scene, so be aware)
So stoked for this. Bring it on, Artificial Eye (currently slated for 4 July UK release)!

Re: Cannes 2011

Posted: Thu May 12, 2011 11:22 am
by Jeff
Van Sant's Restless, meanwhile, is getting eviscerated.

Re: Cannes 2011

Posted: Thu May 12, 2011 1:42 pm
by Alan Smithee
Damn. I new it was a stretch to think Restless would overcome that trailer but I held out hope. I really hate when filmmakers get slots just because of who they are. If the film sucks don't include it. I know that's just one review but it confirms everything I assumed. The festival organizers have to know it's bad.

Re: Cannes 2011

Posted: Thu May 12, 2011 2:19 pm
by Duncan Hopper
Not surprised by this at all, the trailer is vile!

Re: Cannes 2011

Posted: Thu May 12, 2011 3:04 pm
by Nothing
Oh dear, Todd McCarthy just slaughtered it.

The trailer is gobsmackingly awful, it has to be said, and dumping the film into UCR was quite a smack down for a past Palme d'Or winner. And then there's the delayed September release date (hoping to ride out the bad Cannes buzz...?!) I imagine Gus has got the message...

p.s. I feel sorry for Jasper Newell, the 6-year-old in We Need to Talk About Kevin - everyone keeps on talking about what a convincing psychopath he makes... Kirk Honeycutt says he has "the evil eye... the mind behind those eyes clicking away with devious plots"! It's only up from here, I guess :)

Re: Cannes 2011

Posted: Thu May 12, 2011 3:30 pm
by Finch
Same McCarthy concludes his generally positive take on Ramsay's film thus:
All these narrative tricks and the intense scrutiny on a single character do put a viewer at a remove from these events, however. This is a coolly cerebral film with odd music choices - everything from the Beach Boys to vintage country - and a few odd images such as a microscopic view of breast cancer cells dividing, apropos of absolutely nothing. It's a film to think about and debate over but not one to embrace.

Re: Cannes 2011

Posted: Thu May 12, 2011 5:46 pm
by Finch
Weinsteins buy film noir/martial arts hybrid Wu Xia but decide the title is too complicated for Western audiences and rename it as Dragon. Harvey excelling at what he does best: patronising his audiences. ](*,)

Re: Cannes 2011

Posted: Thu May 12, 2011 7:04 pm
by Cosmic Bus
Weinsteins have also picked up Michel Hazanavicius' silent The Artist. Bets on how long before Harvey announces they'll be adding a dub track for the US?

Re: Cannes 2011

Posted: Thu May 12, 2011 8:14 pm
by zedz
Finch wrote:Same McCarthy concludes his generally positive take on Ramsay's film thus:
All these narrative tricks and the intense scrutiny on a single character do put a viewer at a remove from these events, however. This is a coolly cerebral film with odd music choices - everything from the Beach Boys to vintage country - and a few odd images such as a microscopic view of breast cancer cells dividing, apropos of absolutely nothing. It's a film to think about and debate over but not one to embrace.
Oh shit, not another of those films where you have to think. Didn't we get enough of those last year (i.e. four)?

Re: Cannes 2011

Posted: Thu May 12, 2011 10:31 pm
by ianungstad
Reviews from the press screening of Polisse are coming in. Reviews are mixed. The film apparently has really strong elements but it seems like a lot of people found that it crammed too much story and subplots into it's running time and the pacing is too episodic. A few have mentioned that the ending doesn't quite work either. Positives outweigh the negatives I guess.

We Need to Talk About Kevin seems to be the best reviewed film in the main competition so far.

Re: Cannes 2011

Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 12:10 am
by tavernier

Re: Cannes 2011

Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 3:56 am
by Nothing
"Imagine HBO's The Wire streamlined and simplified by a French socialite posing as an artist. Polisse is a true crime."

Eew, sounds abominable - and yet likely to win something.
Manohla wrote:this immaculately produced, claustrophobic and unpersuasive drama turns on the shell-shocked mother (Tilda Swinton) of a 15-year-old bad seed who sprouts into a cartoon psycho. Ms. Ramsay sabotages her refined visual style with the bluntness of her storytelling, washing the screen with red and turning Kevin into a demon child of near-parodic proportions.
A more balanced appraisal? Although I'd lay the likely bluntness of the storytelling at the door of the BBC/UKFC as much as Ramsay herself (and given a free reign, is this the film she would have chosen to make?) Still, it does sound like one of the ones to watch so far, along with Sleepiing Beauty and Snowtown.

Re: Cannes 2011

Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 2:18 pm
by Nothing
Kim Ki-Duk's Arirang may be the first truly must-see film of the festival - derided in most quarters as preposterously self-indulgent, if not utterly deranged, yet already claimed as a masterpiece by others, it makes Brown Bunny sound like a journeyman's calling card...

Re: Cannes 2011

Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 4:01 pm
by Finch
It'd appear that the international press has taken more kindly to Moretti's Pope movie than in native Italy though the consensus seems to be that it's merely pleasant enough to pass the time.

Re: Cannes 2011

Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 4:17 pm
by John Cope
This resource, for instance, gives the impression that the international press has had a very different reaction overall to the screenings so far (i.e. the very high marks for Habemus Papam and Polisse; the genrally more measured reaction to the Ramsay film, etc.).

Re: Cannes 2011

Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 5:57 pm
by rs98762001
That's not the "international" press you linked to, it's the French press. And everyone knows you can't trust them.... :wink:

Re: Cannes 2011

Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 7:40 pm
by ianungstad
Some reviews for Michael and The Kid with the Bike have emerged. Michael seems to be getting good reviews in spite of some petty dicey subject matter. (Could be a strong contender for the Camera D'or) Indiiewire says the latest from the Dardennes is a letdown.

Re: Cannes 2011

Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 7:43 pm
by knives
People said that about Lorna's Silence and that was as good as their other efforts even if the crying was a bit much.