Page 5 of 164

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:04 pm
by criterionsnob
The Tree of Wooden Clogs cover looks brighter and sharper, and the two images are slightly different than the one that was previously posted.

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:09 pm
by domino harvey
Almodovar cover is great, the rest are whatever

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:09 pm
by Ribs
FWIW, the old cover:
Image

(And the new again:
Image
)

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

Posted: Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:02 pm
by ianungstad
Sean Phillips has consistently done some of the best Criterion (and Arrow) covers in recent years. Mildred Pierce is another solid effort!

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 10:50 pm
by domino harvey
Image

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 10:59 pm
by ng4996
I often find myself disappointed with box art that is revealed later than the announcement, and if they keep that cover the trend continues.

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 11:03 pm
by domino harvey
Image

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 11:11 pm
by Zot!
I thought she and him as well. Looks more like a sunny side up egg though.

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2016 11:28 pm
by bdsweeney
Almost no casual buyer browsing in a shop is going to make the connection as to what set of films that cover is referring to.

And surely The Before Trilogy is a series of films with wider market appeal than many other Criterion releases. I can't help but think Criterion are just shooting themselves in the foot.

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 12:10 am
by zedz
bdsweeney wrote:Almost no casual buyer browsing in a shop is going to make the connection as to what set of films that cover is referring to.

And surely The Before Trilogy is a series of films with wider market appeal than many other Criterion releases. I can't help but think Criterion are just shooting themselves in the foot.
I quite like the cover - it evokes a 1970s paperback cover (not that that's especially appropriate!) - but it does seem a little commercially reckless.

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 12:42 am
by Ribs
I have a very hard time believing this release could come out without crediting Julie Delpy or Ethan Hawke on the covers. Seems like a sure-fire way to attract wider attention.

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 12:59 am
by mfunk9786
That Delpy bump

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 2:13 am
by The Narrator Returns
Delpy Bump was the kid who saw Heaven, right?

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 1:38 pm
by mfunk9786
The Narrator Returns wrote:Delpy Bump was the kid who saw Heaven, right?
Post of the year

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 3:08 pm
by Apothocary
ianungstad wrote:Sean Phillips has consistently done some of the best Criterion (and Arrow) covers in recent years. Mildred Pierce is another solid effort!
I completely agree. In fact, I reached out to him the other day and he sent me (without request) the full-res cover art of Mildred Pierce before Criterion's labelling and titling. If anyone is interested in a copy, I'm sure he wouldn't mind me forwarding it also.

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 9:11 pm
by Andre Jurieu
Now I just want Criterion to mock-up some Before Trilogy artwork that is the exact same but with gigantic images of Delpy and Hawke's faces floating above the sun.

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 9:50 pm
by PfR73
Andre Jurieu wrote:Now I just want Criterion to mock-up some Before Trilogy artwork that is the exact same but with gigantic images of Delpy and Hawke's faces floating above the sun.
Just got a new press release from Criterion.
Image

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 9:52 pm
by mfunk9786
I bet that looks a lot better when you peel the BOX ART FINAL sticker and realize that the two faces are part of a larger portrait once you slide the cover off.

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 9:57 pm
by swo17
All of their worst covers should come packaged with a "Box Art Final" banner.

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 10:00 pm
by Andre Jurieu
I think that will work for the casual buyer.

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

Posted: Thu Nov 17, 2016 10:03 pm
by swo17
I can't even begin to count all the times I haven't bought something because I wasn't sure if the box art might be changed like the next day or something.

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2016 7:25 am
by tenia
mfunk9786 wrote:I bet that looks a lot better when you peel the BOX ART FINAL sticker and realize that the two faces are part of a larger portrait once you slide the cover off.
Nah, actually, the sticker hides a big "RT Fresh" logo.

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2016 5:58 am
by Saturnome
Image

Wish I was a better contributor to this forum than someone sharing social media funnies but here I am

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2016 7:15 am
by cdnchris

Re: Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.

Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2016 7:52 pm
by mfunk9786
Image

From Amazon. Certainly doesn't look temporary. I mean, it's awful, but the image seems final. And gigantic, sorry. Not sure how to remedy that bit without the ability to resize the image handy right now.