The Simpsons Movie (David Silverman, 2007)
- davebert
- Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 8:00 pm
- Location: NY
- Contact:
- tryavna
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 8:38 pm
- Location: North Carolina
Where did I mention "realism"? I'm just asking for a little more aesthetic coherence.denti alligator wrote:If you're looking for character consistency in line with a certain expectation of realism then you're bound to be disappointed.tryavna wrote: Not only doesn't it make much sense, it's completely out of character for Todd. At what point in the series have we ever seen Rod and Todd express anything but a slightly/politely disguised fear towards Homer's antics?
- souvenir
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:20 pm
I don't interpret that at all. He may or may not have been interested in working on the movie, but, clearly, Conan is having a laugh in the article. Here's the relevant portion:Antoine Doinel wrote:I can't find a link to it online, but Entertainment Weekly has an interview with Conan O'Brien in which he essentially says his requests to join the writing team for the film were ignored.
My enthusiasm has died down a little.
EW wrote:Two high-profile yet not suprising exclusions: Sam Simon, who'd codeveloped the series with Groening and Brooks but left over creative differences in 1993; and writer-producer-turned-late-night-star Conan O'Brien, who [Al] Jean says would've "laughed" off an invite. "That makes no sense," responds O'Brien. "I cleared my talk-show schedule for a year at great financial cost to myself, got an apartment right outside the Fox lot, and told them I was ready to report to work. All I heard back was that they were having trouble finding me a parking space, and then they stopped returning my calls altogether. I am stunned and disappointed.
- The Elegant Dandy Fop
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 7:25 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
For about 20 years, Matt Groening has been doing the "Life in Hell" cartoons for the L.A. Weekly, and now has the cover all to himself as well.
- Andre Jurieu
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:38 pm
- Location: Back in Milan (Ind.)
The article starts out by stating:souvenir wrote:I don't interpret that at all. He may or may not have been interested in working on the movie, but, clearly, Conan is having a laugh in the article. Here's the relevant portion:Antoine Doinel wrote:I can't find a link to it online, but Entertainment Weekly has an interview with Conan O'Brien in which he essentially says his requests to join the writing team for the film were ignored.
My enthusiasm has died down a little.
EW wrote:Two high-profile yet not suprising exclusions: Sam Simon, who'd codeveloped the series with Groening and Brooks but left over creative differences in 1993; and writer-producer-turned-late-night-star Conan O'Brien, who [Al] Jean says would've "laughed" off an invite. "That makes no sense," responds O'Brien. "I cleared my talk-show schedule for a year at great financial cost to myself, got an apartment right outside the Fox lot, and told them I was ready to report to work. All I heard back was that they were having trouble finding me a parking space, and then they stopped returning my calls altogether. I am stunned and disappointed.
... and Conan even states at the end of the article that "truth be told, I worry that the Simpsons-writing portion of my brain has been destroyed after 14 years of talking to Lindsay Lohan and that guy from One Tree Hill, so maybe it's all for the best.''EW wrote:Conan O'Brien jokes about being one of just two early ''Simpsons'' writers not asked to collaborate on the movie adaptation
It's pretty obvious Conan was exaggerating for comedic effect.
Yeah, I'm disappointed that Conan wasn't involved, but he's a busy guy nowadays. As long as they brought back a few of the classic writers, I'm happy.
- colinr0380
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:30 pm
- Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK
This method of advertising seems to have been controversial. I suppose Homer is trying to do a sort of ring toss game with his doughnut!
- flyonthewall2983
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
- Location: Indiana
- Contact:
- Antoine Doinel
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
- Location: Montreal, Quebec
- Contact:
- Kirkinson
- Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 9:34 am
- Location: Portland, OR
Was that the "5 Options" scene that's up at Yahoo? I think that's definitely the funniest thing I've seen from the film so far.Antoine Doinel wrote:Last night on NBC they were running a clip between episodes of The Office and 30 Rock of a scene in the Arnold Schwarznegger Oval Office that was out-and-out hilarious.
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm
- Antoine Doinel
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
- Location: Montreal, Quebec
- Contact:
Yep, that was it.Kirkinson wrote:Was that the "5 Options" scene that's up at Yahoo? I think that's definitely the funniest thing I've seen from the film so far.Antoine Doinel wrote:Last night on NBC they were running a clip between episodes of The Office and 30 Rock of a scene in the Arnold Schwarznegger Oval Office that was out-and-out hilarious.
- flyonthewall2983
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
- Location: Indiana
- Contact:
- The Elegant Dandy Fop
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 7:25 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- malcolm1980
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:37 am
- Location: Manila, Philippines
- Contact:
I just saw it.
We have now found the reason why a lot of the episodes of The Simpsons these days aren't up to par with the earlier episodes, all the hilarious gags were reserved for the movie. The writers of the best episodes of The Simpsons team up to create an extended episode that seldom runs out of gas and pretty much worthy of the big-screen. Jokes fly in a rapid-fire manner but never forgetting the heart and soul of what makes The Simpsons leagues above it's imitators. Stay for the credits.
We have now found the reason why a lot of the episodes of The Simpsons these days aren't up to par with the earlier episodes, all the hilarious gags were reserved for the movie. The writers of the best episodes of The Simpsons team up to create an extended episode that seldom runs out of gas and pretty much worthy of the big-screen. Jokes fly in a rapid-fire manner but never forgetting the heart and soul of what makes The Simpsons leagues above it's imitators. Stay for the credits.
-
patrick
- Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 4:15 pm
- Location: Philadelphia
I wonder if they'll do the same thing as their preview of the Aqua Teen movie and run the entire movie in a postage-stamp-sized area of the screen.The Elegant Dandy Fop wrote:Does the mean with 3 frames of animation a minute, and developed with stoners in mind?flyonthewall2983 wrote:Thursday night at midnight on Cartoon Network, a preview of the movie will be shown "Adult Swim Style".
Kidding!
- Gregor Samsa
- Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 8:41 am
No Lovitz lines in there, though Mr. Lombardo is in the background at various points. As for the actual movie, I didn't think it was very good. To me it felt like an extended version of an episode from the past few years. Inconsistent jokes, crass humor, forced attempts at emotion etc: Then again, I wasn't expecting much more.Matt wrote:Any word if any of Lovitz's characters reappear? Artie "Busy Hands" Ziff, perhaps? Llewellyn Sinclair?domino harvey wrote:Albert Brooks is a guaranteed slam dunk on the Simpsons, AMAZING STUFF
- Antoine Doinel
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
- Location: Montreal, Quebec
- Contact:
Hmmm....I guess I shouldn't be suprised that the plot of the film hinges on how stupid the writers could make Homer:
Still holding out some hope anyway.....Part of the plot has Homer falling head-over-heels for a slop-eating pig while ignoring his family. In Hollywood, summer movies are not known for being brainy, but it's rare for filmmakers to publicly impugn the intelligence of their leading man. Then again, this is Homer.
James Brooks, the "Simpsons" writer/producer who has been with the Fox television series since its start, had a one-word answer when asked if Homer's pig obsession is the dumbest stunt Homer's ever pulled. "Absolutely," he told Reuters.
-
mogwai
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 6:50 am
- Location: California
I just got out of the theater. The movie is funny. Very funny. Not all of the jokes hit, but the majority of them do. And, like malcolm said, they fly at you in rapid succession. I thought the pacing was perfect and the length of the movie just right -- it really does feel simply like an extended episode. Great stuff. Now if only the seasons could start being this funny again....
- Antoine Doinel
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
- Location: Montreal, Quebec
- Contact:
Move quickly, and you can get your copy of the Simpsons soundtrack in limited-edition donut packaging (hopefully better than the plastic head DVD cases).
- lord_clyde
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 8:22 am
- Location: Ogden, UT
It reminds me of my Simpsons "Songs in the Key of Springfield" soundtrack, where the disc is a donut and behind it is a greasy napkin.Antoine Doinel wrote:Move quickly, and you can get your copy of the Simpsons soundtrack in limited-edition donut packaging (hopefully better than the plastic head DVD cases).
- flyonthewall2983
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:31 pm
- Location: Indiana
- Contact:
- Joe Buck
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 10:59 pm
- Location: New York
I agree. I had a swell time and all, but really, it isn't anything special. It was what I expected.Gregor Samsa wrote:To me it felt like an extended version of an episode from the past few years. Inconsistent jokes, crass humor, forced attempts at emotion etc: Then again, I wasn't expecting much more.