criterionforum.org

therewillbeblus wrote: Tue Oct 03, 2023 4:42 am The spectrum is so wide though, with many misinformed symptoms attached, that we should be careful about pre-diagnosing people as "very likely" to be on it just because of stereotyped observable behavior by non-professionals...

Thanks for pointing this out. Although I've been officially (and rigorously) diagnosed as autistic myself, I'm the sort of person more likely to be disturbed by inappropriate audience noises than to cause them. It's one of the reasons I stopped going to cinemas about 20 years ago. I remember particularly a National Film Theatre (BFI) screening of THE GOLEM (1920) which was received by the other audience members as if it were a non-stop slapstick comedy.

Even at home, I've been known to complain about my partner's heavy breathing during (mainstream) films and, despite the fact I also have a diagnosis of severe hearing loss in both ears, the constant chuntering noise made by my Sony S-3700 as it plays discs is often distracting to me (apparently, not a faulty one as several reviews of this model complain of it too). Extreme sensitivity to noise (and/or light, taste, smell, touch) is of course very common among autistic people.

I had a hilariously bizarre theatre experience this weekend. I saw Dumb Money at a local multiplex, and right behind me in the mostly empty theatre were a mother and her two sons who looked to be about 8 and 10 years old. From their conversation I overheard before the film started that, it was clear that they thought the movie was going to be about video games, rather than the stock market. The subject matter was clearly above their heads, and the boys kept audibly asking their mom "what's shorting? what's an IPO? What's a congressional subpoena?" and their mom did her best to answer (again, at a volume definitely above a whisper).She even got most of it correct (though not all of it!). I was curious as to how the mom would react to the strong language, but she was laughing harder than anyone in the theatre. The kicker at the end was when the kids seemed surprised that the people in the film were all still alive. Too bizarre for me to get angry, so I never said anything.

I had that experience once, when me and my brother went to see Forget Paris which would have had you believe by the commercials it was mostly Billy Crystal as an NBA ref. Mom took us.

With respect to laughing guy: since he's popped up I've been on both sides of it, in the let him be camp currently but, I also don't sit anywhere near him. Very tough call on what to do about it but, knowing the intense importance of these screenings to these people, it would be unwise not to check him. Is it really not possible for him to control himself?

At FOOLISH WIVES at the Museum Of The Moving Image, a cellphone went off, apparently belonging to the kind of jackass who just decides to let it ring and ring and ring and ring, until someone finally had to yell at him to "turn that fucking phone off!"

A rarity at MOMI, where audiences are usually most respectful and well-behaved.

The laugher in question speaks, complete with Q&A clips where you can hear his laugh for yourself. In other news, I look forward to everyone accommodating my misophonia and learning to chew with their mouths closed.

willoneill wrote: Tue Oct 03, 2023 5:39 pm I had a hilariously bizarre theatre experience this weekend. I saw Dumb Money at a local multiplex, and right behind me in the mostly empty theatre were a mother and her two sons who looked to be about 8 and 10 years old. From their conversation I overheard before the film started that, it was clear that they thought the movie was going to be about video games, rather than the stock market. The subject matter was clearly above their heads, and the boys kept audibly asking their mom "what's shorting? what's an IPO? What's a congressional subpoena?" and their mom did her best to answer (again, at a volume definitely above a whisper).She even got most of it correct (though not all of it!). I was curious as to how the mom would react to the strong language, but she was laughing harder than anyone in the theatre. The kicker at the end was when the kids seemed surprised that the people in the film were all still alive. Too bizarre for me to get angry, so I never said anything.

this is amazing

hearthesilence wrote: Sun Oct 01, 2023 8:22 pm This could probably go in the New York Repertory thread as well, but for those who frequently attend post-screening discussions here in NYC, has anyone noticed an extremely loud and obnoxious laughter at those events over the past year or two? It's coming from a guy who is very likely to have autism spectrum disorder and it's been particularly awkward because I'm not sure how one should respond to the guy. It's gotten so frequent and disruptive that apparently people in an official capacity HAVE talked to him about, especially when he's attending a professional event - he's been made well-aware that at times it can be inappropriate but he apparently has been dismissive of such criticism.

I think I know who you are talking about—if it’s who I am thinking of (he was laughing egregiously at, among other things, PlayTime on 70 at the Paris and had to be spoken to)—he is very much “on the spectrum” and is sadly just clueless.

senseabove wrote: Wed Oct 18, 2023 4:29 pm The laugher in question speaks, complete with Q&A clips where you can hear his laugh for yourself. In other news, I look forward to everyone accommodating my misophonia and learning to chew with their mouths closed.

I'm stunned that he's lashing out at the local theaters for "institutional ableism" and accusing them of violating ADA compliance rules, arguing that "discrimination is evident at venues that don’t allow people with physical disabilities to easily access the stage or ground level to participate in Q&As." Every single venue I can think of here is handicap accessible, at minimum to the floor level of the theater (and where I've seen some Q&A's happen when the guest can't be onstage, which is more than acceptable considering they have microphones anyway). Handicap seating is often closest to where the guests are, and in places like Lincoln Center where handicap seating is in the back, it's not an issue - they have someone running around with a microphone and request that anyone with a question wait until it's brought to them. I imagine he's angry despite his claims that he isn't, but if he's a freelance critic, he really needs to be careful not to violate the trust between him and his professional contacts.

So today for the first time I actually encountered the Laughing Menace after having managed to avoid him for years. He laughed, gasped, ooh-and-aah’d, and oh-no’d his way through the first official New York screening of Man, Woman And Sin in 97 years, at the MoMA. It was distracting to say the least. When reading this thread in October I thought I was team let him be, but now I’m firmly on team stay in the house. His refusal on principle to even consider correcting himself is wrong.

I've had perfectly uneventful screenings ever since I went back to watching films in theatres last year. But when I saw American Fiction on Monday, some older guy near the front answered a fucking video call on his smartphone. When the person calling asked where he was, the guy turned his phone towards the screen in explanation. Thankfully the person on the other end said goodbye quickly and hung up so I didn't have to bellow at the guy for being a total cretin in public.

Someone ruined a screening of UHF by angrily pulling out and cocking his gun after being repeatedly told to be quiet (and "someone may have thrown a drink" at him) at Chicago's Logan Theatre

Christ that escalated quickly.

To be fair, what do you expect to happen at a screening of UHF

yoloswegmaster wrote: Tue Jul 11, 2023 5:20 pm Bit of a strange question but is it normal for a random person to choose the seat next to you even if there are a lot of empty seats? The local theatre lets you choose your seat in advance and provides a preview of the available seats, and I noticed that someone decided to choose the spot right next to mine despite the screening not even being close to full. I would understand if the screening was full but to me it's just bizarre to sit right next to me when the rest of the row that we are sitting in is free.

I just had this happen to me again. I was the first person to choose my seat at this screening (highlighted in red) and I notice that 2 people chose to sit right next to me, despite there being an abundance of seats available! I don't care if someone chooses to sit right behind or in front of me but to choose to sit next to me is just bizarre to me. Is this a common thing or am I just unlucky?

I recently tried purchasing a movie ticket and the website didn't allow me to choose a seat which left only one open seat between me and another person. So that could be what is happening here.

Drucker wrote: Fri Aug 09, 2024 4:43 pm I recently tried purchasing a movie ticket and the website didn't allow me to choose a seat which left only one open seat between me and another person. So that could be what is happening here.

I just tried that and you're correct as it doesn't let you leave an open seat between the next person. Still have no idea why they didn't put a 2 seat distance (or choose any other spot for that matter). Hopefully they create a buffer spot between us at the time of the screening, otherwise I'm in for a very awkward screening.

They probably chose a center seat for the same reason you did--to get an optimal view. What would be creepy is if you chose a seat in the back corner or something and they still sat right next to you

I saw a documentary about this with David Niven in it

And I can immediately tell you were booking a movie at a Cineplex theatre, yoloswegmaster. I know that online layout all too well.

One of the reasons I sit close to the screen (aside from needing the movie to envelop me if I'm to have a hope of watching with undivided attention) is that people are less likely to sit there and I don't have to worry about this very thing. Also, if I find I don't like my seats, I'll use my phone to check the current seat availability and then move somewhere else.

Normally I wouldn't venture here, but I saw people insinuating that AMC's Secret Screening blindfolded advance showing thing this coming Monday will likely be Joshua Oppenheimer's The End. For those who have gone to one of these before/have a sense of what they're like, what would you rate the likelihood of that film actually being the one chosen? AMC displays the approximate runtime and rating ahead of schedule, so one can see that the surprise movie in question is about 150 minutes long and is rated R. The only other immediately forthcoming movie I can think of that fits those criteria is Gladiator II, which seems like too big a title to be dropped into advance showings on the Monday before opening.

Never Cursed wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 3:32 am Normally I wouldn't venture here, but I saw people insinuating that AMC's Secret Screening blindfolded advance showing thing this coming Monday will likely be Joshua Oppenheimer's The End. For those who have gone to one of these before/have a sense of what they're like, what would you rate the likelihood of that film actually being the one chosen? AMC displays the approximate runtime and rating ahead of schedule, so one can see that the surprise movie in question is about 150 minutes long and is rated R. The only other immediately forthcoming movie I can think of that fits those criteria is Gladiator II, which seems like too big a title to be dropped into advance showings on the Monday before opening.

I looked into this last week, and was convinced that it wouldn't be, but now that I look at Neon's spaghetti-at-the-wall promotional strategies with Longlegs (and it's rerelease recently), as well as the runtime, it just might be The End. The runtime of Gladiator Deux feels like a red herring, but only because we are in the throes of award season bloated runtime era, lest we forget the Thursday night VIP double price tickets that have been happening since the summertime (which applies to this sequel). That is, it's already money in the bank, and Paramount probably doesn't need to throw $5 word-of-mouth promo at what is basically the in-theaters-only Super Bowl (or Superb Owl, if we're talking about Clash Of The Titans-era pictures). Hard to imagine a worthwhile picture appearing in this rigamarole of a sneaky system, but I guess I'm going to the movies on Monday.

For those who are confused, here's this week's AMC Screen Unseen thread as well as Regal's Monday Mystery Movie thread on teh reddits (coincidentally, the runtimes for Nov 18 are 4min shy of each other). However, the Regal thread is pointing to The Order (MGM), starring Jude Law.

On the other hand, maybe everyone will win & both chains will show Queer, instead

I don’t know if it has any bearing on this series, but AMC already sent me an email offering free tickets for a Gladiator II early screening a few weeks ago, so I imagine they’ve already completed their early promotions for that film

Never Cursed wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 3:32 amNormally I wouldn't venture here, but I saw people insinuating that AMC's Secret Screening blindfolded advance showing thing this coming Monday will likely be Joshua Oppenheimer's The End… The only other immediately forthcoming movie I can think of that fits those criteria is Gladiator II, which seems like too big a title to be dropped into advance showings on the Monday before opening.

So it turns out that not only was this, in fact, Gladiator II, but they added a second screening of the secret show on top of a publicly announced promotional advance showing. Three screens in the AMC multiplex simultaneously were showing this movie, and five (including the IMAX screen) were showing it and Wicked. The only thing I regret more than going is convincing therewillbeblus to join my sally.

(Imagine me now unfurling my cape like a bird’s wings and spittle-screaming caked in white makeup to a CGI colosseum’s worth of Maltese men in togas). So gluttonous are these terrible Thanksgiving blockbusters that they have also consumed the Monday of the week before Thanksgiving. But what else can be expected from an industry that rejects “unmarketable” projects like Megalopolis yet embraces the likes of Joker 2 and Venom 3 and Red One, films that will, if fortunate, break even, and if not, lose more money than several Megalopoles? What else can the theaters do but shovel out this week’s garbage and front-load next week’s hotness?

Never Cursed wrote: Tue Nov 19, 2024 3:16 amWhat else can the theaters do but shovel out this week’s garbage and front-load next week’s hotness?

I will never underestimate the will of big studios post-Halloween ever again, nor in cahoots with Big Turkey: to both we are just chicken feed ](*,)