Re: Criterion & MGM
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 11:33 am
Ball of Fire is a really fun screwball comedy type movie from the 40's that is defiitely worth checking out; in case anyone happening by here doesn't know it. Really enjoyed it.
Nope, it's MGM (via Samuel Goldwyn). The MGM disc (and the earlier Goldwyn/HBO disc) contain decent, serviceable transfers, and absolutely nothing else. I love the film, and I'm sure Criterion would love the opportunity to add Hawks to the collection (not to mention the contributions from Brackett & Wilder, Toland, and Newman).kaujot wrote:Didn't Ball of Fire get one of those Fox Cinema Classics releases? Or am I imagining things?
Also THE ENTERTAINER, JOSEPH ANDREWS, CHARGE OF THE LIGHT BRIGADE, LOOK BACK IN ANGER, MADEMOISELLE, etc. MGM has lots of Richardson.beamish13 wrote:I wonder if Criterion could snag some Tony Richardson from MGM. I've heard that "Tom Jones" is in need of a major restoration, but there's always "The Hotel New Hampshire".
The BFI blu-ray of the latter title is fine for me, thanks.Jeff wrote:I could definitely see Criterion releasing Richardson's Look Back in Anger alongside Karel Reisz's Saturday Night and Sunday Morning and including their short doc, Mamma Don't Allow, on one of the discs.
We all know that good releases in other territories in no way preclude Criterion creating their own releases for the U.S. market though. Especially true here, since the BFI Blu is region locked. I actually think that Saturday Night and Sunday Morning is probably one of the more likely titles, including a port of most BFI supplements.perkizitore wrote:The BFI blu-ray of the latter title is fine for me, thanks.
I asked them about The Charge of The Light Brigade on Facebook and was slightly surprised to get the reply: "Not on our slate, but it seems readily available. Is the existing edition no good?" (surprised inasmuch as I thought they'd have it on their radar)Jameson281 wrote:Also THE ENTERTAINER, JOSEPH ANDREWS, CHARGE OF THE LIGHT BRIGADE, LOOK BACK IN ANGER, MADEMOISELLE, etc. MGM has lots of Richardson.beamish13 wrote:I wonder if Criterion could snag some Tony Richardson from MGM. I've heard that "Tom Jones" is in need of a major restoration, but there's always "The Hotel New Hampshire".
They said no this week to MGM's THE KNACK, but they did note that Lester is a favorite of theirs. I'd do anything for a Criterion JUGGERNAUT on Blu. The MGM disc is still in print, but mere DVD can't do that film's density and scope justice.What A Disgrace wrote:There's a lot of lesser known MGM-owned stuff Criterion might be going for, too. Beach Red, Hallelujah I'm a Bum, and all kinds of Richard Lester (obscure and well known) is MGM property...I can especially see them going for How I Won the War, with next year being Lennon's 70th birthday. Pop *that* on a sticker, and somebody might buy it (though I don't think I need a sticker).
I'm all for "How I Won the War" and "The Bed-Sitting Room."jaredsap wrote:They said no this week to MGM's THE KNACK, but they did note that Lester is a favorite of theirs. I'd do anything for a Criterion JUGGERNAUT on Blu. The MGM disc is still in print, but mere DVD can't do that film's density and scope justice.What A Disgrace wrote:There's a lot of lesser known MGM-owned stuff Criterion might be going for, too. Beach Red, Hallelujah I'm a Bum, and all kinds of Richard Lester (obscure and well known) is MGM property...I can especially see them going for How I Won the War, with next year being Lennon's 70th birthday. Pop *that* on a sticker, and somebody might buy it (though I don't think I need a sticker).
IIRC, the existing edition is also non-anamorphic.Perkins Cobb wrote:The existing R1 disc for Sweet Smell of Success has a gigantic tramline scratch running through about four reels, so while I'm usually meh on Criterion reissuing studio product, I couldn't complain about this one.
Henry V is the most preposterous piece of filmmaking i've ever seen on this subject...beamish13 wrote:Has anyone asked about Branagh's "Henry V"? We may never get "Chimes at Midnight", but it's the next best thing.
Now THAT is a great idea that I hadn't thought of. I'm not in the "misunderstood masterpiece" camp, but there are some absolutely stunning, remarkable sequences, especially in the first half. No one could argue that, for good or bad, the film isn't incredibly important to cinema history. Include the original 225-minute premiere version, this doc, and lots of contextual supplements, and Criterion could instigate a reevaluation of the film and its place in the cannon. I'm not sure that Cimino would participate though.Cold Bishop wrote:Heaven's Gate?! (I'd ask, but I don't think I could take the rejection)
He'd be stupid not to. Criterion's cultural cache is so powerful that even those who mocked the film and Cimino for years would probably pull an about-face and start calling it a misunderstood masterpiece.Jeff wrote:I'm not sure that Cimino would participate though.
Cimino is known for being somewhat press shy in general, and extremely reluctant to talk about Heaven's Gate at all. He didn't participate in the feature documentary made about the film, and generally declines to be interviewed. I know he did participate in some supplemental material for the DVDs of The Deer Hunter and Year of the Dragon, and George Hickenlooper's book Reel Conversations supposedly includes a fairly candid interview though, so anything's possible..Highway 61 wrote:Why do you think he wouldn't participate? Has he taken a "I never want to revisit that period of my life again" stance on the film?