Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 3:03 pm
Will Criterion release Tati's Traffic?justeleblanc wrote:I was hoping they'd release a box after Traffic for a complete Hulot set.
Will Criterion release Tati's Traffic?justeleblanc wrote:I was hoping they'd release a box after Traffic for a complete Hulot set.
Well, I think the speculation is mostly just based on a poster for the film that was spotted in a Vanity Fair photo of the Criterion Collection staff. I don't think they have ever confirmed that they will release the film.atcolomb wrote:Will Criterion release Tati's Traffic?
Video ****
This new anamorphic transfer from Criterion is one of the best I've ever seen…Tati's 70 mm vision has come to life in full digital glory. The colors, textures and details are all incredibly sharp…every frame is filled with information, and nothing gets lost or muddled in the mix. This was a visual delight from start to finish. This is what DVD is all about, friends.
This is exactly what they should be doing more of in the future (and I can think of numerous commentaries that would have benefitted from this approach). All killer, no filler.Disc 1 also has a selected scene commentary by film historian Philip Kemp. It covers eight segments and runs about 46 minutes. When you select it, the DVD is self-editing, moving from commentary scene to commentary scene, cutting out the in-between.
I think this might be more of a carry over from the BFI disc than any conscious change of policy by Criterion. I haven't got the BFI Playtime (been waiting for the Criterion!), but the Philip Kemp commentary on the BFI Yojimbo is similarly only over selected scenes. There's no cutting out of the bits he isn't talking over on that disc (one of BFI's earliest) though.Narshty wrote:This is exactly what they should be doing more of in the future (and I can think of numerous commentaries that would have benefitted from this approach). All killer, no filler.Disc 1 also has a selected scene commentary by film historian Philip Kemp. It covers eight segments and runs about 46 minutes. When you select it, the DVD is self-editing, moving from commentary scene to commentary scene, cutting out the in-between.
And a digipack would make for a rather unweildy boxed set (assuming that remains a possibility).Anthony wrote:It sounds like the digipack packaging will be the only drawback for me on this release. I was hoping for a double amaray case. Oh well.
Yes, in theater (seen at the AFI) it looked just like the new Criterion release.Simon wrote:Can anyone that has seen the restoration in theater confirm that the blueish tint shown in the caps at the beaver is like you recollect? It sure looks sharp but it's quite different from the BFI and the previous edition. I doubt they would mess this up, just wondering.
It does, but I'm a bit concerned by the first of the comparison shots, with Tati by what appears to be a men's room. The new Criterion appears to have heavy edge enhancement on this shot. Look at the rim of his hat!Brianruns10 wrote:They don't have the new review on the main page, but I poked around, and discovered the updated page through another list! Looks pretty darn good!
That's not Tati, but it certainly looks like edge enhancement. Let's hope it's not. Anyone got their copy and ready to share impressions of the moving image?Bleddyn Williams wrote:I'm a bit concerned by the first of the comparison shots, with Tati by what appears to be a men's room. The new Criterion appears to have heavy edge enhancement on this shot. Look at the rim of his hat!
I don't know how these screenshots were created, but I look forward to more opinions on the image...
Terrible? How so?The first capture at the Beav comparison of Spirit of the Beehive looks terrible
For someone who isn't sure what "edge enhancement" is...what is it? Why is it bad?denti alligator wrote:That's not Tati, but it certainly looks like edge enhancement. Let's hope it's not. Anyone got their copy and ready to share impressions of the moving image?
Here's your answer.Tribe wrote:For someone who isn't sure what "edge enhancement" is...what is it? Why is it bad?