Page 6 of 16
Posted: Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:19 pm
by dx23
They are using an abacus. The decision was made by George W. Bush, since it is the only way he knows how to count.
Posted: Sat Jul 01, 2006 11:28 pm
by Matt
Myra Breckinridge wrote:The voting is now officially over and they will announce the winners in August (one month to count votes?!)
They probably want to confirm that the winners are "ready" enough to announce a release date in August.
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 12:40 am
by kekid
Can someone please remind us what happened to "Greed"?
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 12:45 am
by What A Disgrace
A thought.
The 50th anniversary of von Stroheim's death is next year.
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 12:48 am
by Gigi M.
From
here:
THE WIND, SCARLET LETTER, THE BIG PARADE, GREED, SHOW PEOPLE, THE CROWD - Coming in 2006/2007.
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 5:14 am
by justeleblanc
What A Disgrace wrote:A thought.
The 50th anniversary of von Stroheim's death is next year.
a thought that unfortunately has no bearing on the release.
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 7:25 pm
by shearerchic
matt wrote:Myra Breckinridge wrote:Then read an interview with George Feltenstein:
....
Great stuff coming so I recommend you read it!
Ah, the idea of having
Vivacious Lady on DVD just made my day.
and with fred astaire, maybe we'll get a real version of royal wedding, yolanda and the thief and a damsel in distress.
Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 4:00 pm
by Lino
According to the extras on the forthcoming Forbidden Planet SE 2xDVD, namely the part mentioning "Science-fiction movie trailer gallery", I think it's safe to assume that we will be seeing more Sci-Fi from them in the near future.
Besides, it's already been disclosed in this year's chat that The Giant Behemoth, Queen of Outer Space and Attack of the 50 Foot Woman are on the way.
Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 4:42 pm
by Narshty
Unless it's just cross-promotional junk for Soylent Green, The Omega Man, Demon Seed, Thing from Another World, et al. Warner rarely seem to include trailers for films not already out on disc. Would be nice though.
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:11 pm
by Lino
matt wrote:Myra Breckinridge wrote:The voting is now officially over and they will announce the winners in August (one month to count votes?!)
They probably want to confirm that the winners are "ready" enough to announce a release date in August.
Any news about this lot?
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 10:01 pm
by Ashirg
Per Lino,
The Arrangement is now listed for January 30, 2007 release date. So I checked the other titles and I found
Up Periscope for December 19, 2006 and
There Was a Crooked Man with a DVD cover, but no release date.
Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:11 pm
by Lino
And now, The Arrangement can already be pre-ordered, along with Up Periscope but the page for There was a Crooked Man has now disappeared.
Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 4:27 pm
by shearerchic
Lino wrote:matt wrote:Myra Breckinridge wrote:The voting is now officially over and they will announce the winners in August (one month to count votes?!)
They probably want to confirm that the winners are "ready" enough to announce a release date in August.
Any news about this lot?
And the winners are.....
Best Foot Forward - Dec 19
Angels in the Outfield (Amazon Exclusive) - Dec 19
Presenting Lily Mars (Amazon Exclusive) - Dec 19
Up Periscope - Dec 19
Operation Crossbow - Dec 19
The Illustrated Man - Dec 19
Looker - Jan 30
Madame Curie - Jan 30
Gymkata - Jan 30
The Arrangement - Jan 30
Band of Angels- Jan 30
All of the titles are available for pre-order on Amazon and they show the cover art.
Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 4:42 pm
by Lino
Well, at least the ones I was hoping they'd release, will in fact be released -- The Arrangement and The Illustrated Man.
Oh, and the cover for Gymkata is hilarious... It positively reeks of 80's kitsch.
Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 7:08 pm
by Schkura
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 1:27 pm
by Lino
Tidier info
here (with artwork).
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 4:51 pm
by Gregory
It seems 2006 will have been a pretty typical year for Warner in terms of volume of classic titles, unless my estimations are way off.
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 5:06 pm
by Matt
Gregory wrote:It seems 2006 will have been a pretty typical year for Warner in terms of volume of classic titles, unless my estimations are way off.
With the exception of the Kubrick SEs, they have released or will release by the end of the year everything
they said they would. It may just not seem like much because it's been a consistent trickle of releases (and many of them are of marginal interest to most).
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 5:15 pm
by Lino
My only consolation is that they've finally announced all their Superman DVDs and that they will now concentrate on more meaningful releases (namely some that they've been promising for the last couple of years now and still haven't gotten around to them - Performance, Ken Russell, Esther Williams, etc.).
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 5:21 pm
by Gregory
Matt wrote:With the exception of the Kubrick SEs, they have released or will release by the end of the year everything they said they would. It may just not seem like much because it's been a consistent trickle of releases (and many of them are of marginal interest to most).
I suppose we could also see announcements this month for the remaining box sets that were expected for 2006. But what I was wondering was whether we really saw a "major initiative" this year in comparison to the volume of releases of recent years.
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 5:30 pm
by Matt
I think another thing that makes this look not so much like a "major initiative" is that so many of the releases were in box sets, some with titles unavailable individually. All of the John Ford discs were sold individually and a couple were available presviously, but that's 13 films right there. The Gable box is 6 films, Tennessee Williams another 6, Busby Berkeley 5, and so on. If they had released an equivalent number of non-related films, it might seem like a much bigger deal. Without a count of 2005's releases, though, I'm having a hard time telling how "major" this initiative really was. 2005 certainly had its share of box sets, too: Bette Davis 1, Joan Crawford, Garbo, Film Noir 2, Astaire and Rogers 1, Thin Man.
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:13 pm
by tryavna
One thing is sure: not much in the way of silents in '06.
Maybe those alleged efforts on Greed, Big Parade, et al will begin showing up in early '07.
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:14 pm
by Cinesimilitude
Universal Outdid everyone when it came to HD releases. hopefully warner changes that in 2007.
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:40 pm
by Matt
SncDthMnky wrote:Universal Outdid everyone when it came to HD releases. hopefully warner changes that in 2007.
Keep that noise in the HD-DVD/Blu-Ray thread.
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 9:13 pm
by Andre Jurieu
I'm just getting impatient about The Magnificent Ambersons.