Page 58 of 96
Re: Artificial Eye
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2012 4:27 pm
by kidc85
rattlebag wrote:There is currently a great AE sale on in Fopp. Loads of films for a fiver and boxsets for £15. Satantango is a bargain at £12.
I owe you a major thank you. Picked up the Angelopoulos Collection for £15, alongside a whole bunch of other great stuff.
Re: Artificial Eye
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2012 8:12 pm
by rattlebag
kidc85 wrote:
I owe you a major thank you. Picked up the Angelopoulos Collection for £15, alongside a whole bunch of other great stuff.
You are welcome! I bought the third Angelopoulos boxset and I'm kicking myself for buying the second one two weeks ago! Same goes for the first Arrow Fassbinder box that they had in for £15. Although I mustn't complain as I got some gems.
Re: Artificial Eye
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 1:27 am
by peerpee
I've just abandoned a late-night screening of Sokurov's FAUST on Blu-ray due to what looks like massive embedded interlacing that I couldn't take my eyes off. I've tried it on two players, all my other Blus play great – it's definitely this disc. It's apparent right away from the opening text credits, which are noticeably lined. Stepping through on pause reveals that every frame of the film is interlaced and it looks like a badly encoded DVD.
If you click the Beaver pics to get the full image and look closely at each grab, you can see the lines clearly. Beaver says: "The 1080P supports the film's idiosyncrasies as adeptly as possible which includes some horizontal lines - mostly imperceptible in standard viewing." --- Why would part of Sokurov's visual aesthetic be to introduce the sort of interlacing we're familiar with from PAL > NTSC conversions? It doesn't make any sense. I realise that I'm highly perceptive to these issues, but this surely can't be supposed to look like this? It looks bobbins.
Something really shit has gone on somewhere here. There is also massive compression artefact blooming in shadows. Looks like a duff encode and a recall to me.
Are there any other Blu-rays of this film available in other territories? Are they similarly afflicted?
Re: Artificial Eye
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 1:52 am
by warren oates
This is so disappointing. My copy is en route from the UK... Shit. I was so psyched to see this... And there's no U.S. release on the horizon.
Re: Artificial Eye
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 1:54 am
by The Fanciful Norwegian
There's an Italian Blu-ray (no English subs). No idea how it looks, though I've seen the Italian DVD and it looks fine. It's certainly not interlaced.
Re: Artificial Eye
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 3:48 am
by Oedipax
The Italian blu does NOT have the same issues. It must be something strictly on AE's end. I hope they get it sorted!
Re: Artificial Eye
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 2:51 pm
by peerpee
The film was shot on film with Arricams. I'm wondering whether at some point in post, during all the digital FX work, someone somewhere has done a poor conversion to or from 1080/50i (25fps > 24fps, or 24fps > 25fps) and embedded the interlacing in a 1080/24p master that AE couldn't unravel? With AE simply encoding that to BD? (ie. the HD tape AE were sent looked like this?)
It beggars belief that these "lines" are part of Sokurov's aesthetic.
Re: Artificial Eye
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 6:32 pm
by bigP
HMV are listing a
Dardenne Brothers Collection 6 DVD box set, for December 10th.
Re: Artificial Eye
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 7:21 pm
by Calvin
Bresson's Mouchette is also slated for December 10th. DVD-only.
Re: Artificial Eye
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 11:20 am
by HJackson
Is Nouveaux Pictures dead or something? COME AND SEE, CRANES ARE FLYING and MOUCHETTE are now Artificial Eye, their Resnais and Godard films are now handled by Studio Canal. How soon until people in the UK can expect a decent copy of 8½ (Nouveux's disc of that was a real turd, right up there with Second Sight's 4x3 letterboxed GIRL CAN'T HELP IT)?
Re: Artificial Eye
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 2:27 pm
by Calvin
HJackson wrote:Is Nouveaux Pictures dead or something? COME AND SEE, CRANES ARE FLYING and MOUCHETTE are now Artificial Eye, their Resnais and Godard films are now handled by Studio Canal. How soon until people in the UK can expect a decent copy of 8½ (Nouveux's disc of that was a real turd, right up there with Second Sight's 4x3 letterboxed GIRL CAN'T HELP IT)?
I don't know whether or not they are still functioning but even if they are, they probably won't be around for much longer. Their non-Fellini big titles have been re-released by Artificial Eye, Arrow and Studio Canal. Their last release was Suspiria, back in 2010.
Re: Artificial Eye
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 7:59 pm
by MichaelB
Calvin wrote:Their last release was Suspiria, back in 2010.
...which was supposed to be part of a series that never materialised.
A shame: once I'd tuned out the toe-curlingly patronising "taking trash seriously" tagline, I was rather impressed with the extras on that disc - they had a fair bit more substance than the usual self-congratulatory puff pieces.
Re: Artificial Eye
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 12:30 pm
by feckless boy
Beaver on
The Turin Horse. Is that a new bitrate record?
Re: Artificial Eye
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 1:29 pm
by martin
I've made a
list of specifications for a lot of French films on blu-ray, and I think I've seen video bitrates approaching 40,000 kbs. 35 Mbs is very high though.
Re: Artificial Eye
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 7:16 am
by GaryC
It's not quite true that the only extra on the UK disc (DVD) of The Turin Horse is the short Hotel Magnezit - there's also the trailer, all 44 seconds of it. The feature is 1.66:1 anamorphic with a Dolby 2.0 soundtrack.
Two other AE titles I've received DVD checkdiscs for are:
Goodbye First Love - 1.85:1 anamorphic. Dolby 5.1 & 2.0. The only extra is the trailer, though there are adverts for Curzon On Demand at the start.
Corpo Celeste - 1.85:1 anamorphic. Dolby 5.1 and 2.0. Extras: the trailer plus a 40-minute interview with the director and producer. This interview looks odd - it's 16:9 anamorphic but seems like it was shot in 4:3 and has been horizontally stretched. This may of course not be the case on the retail copies.
Picture quality looks fine at a brief glance. Corpo Celeste looks particularly grainy, but then it was shot on 16mm.
Most Artificial Eye DVDs I've seen recently have been region-free, but these three are Region 2 only.
Re: Artificial Eye
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 8:20 am
by MichaelB
Excellent news - I'm glad I waited for the Beaver comparison. Nice though the additional Cinema Guild extras undoubtedly are, the short was the only thing I was really interested in, and the Artificial Eye disc will be significantly cheaper for the UK-based likes of me.
Re: Artificial Eye
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:06 am
by The Fanciful Norwegian
feckless boy wrote:Beaver on
The Turin Horse. Is that a new bitrate record?
There's a lengthy list
here. A few IMAX documentaries released in the early days of BD apparently used constant-bitrate 40Mbps encodes, though it doesn't seem to have helped the PQ much. Anime titles from Japan regularly exceed 35Mbps. Two of the most surprising high-bitrate titles on the list are
The Simpsons Movie and
28 Days Later (!!!).
Re: Artificial Eye
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 12:41 am
by peerpee
Has no-one else had a close look at the FAUST BD yet?
Re: Artificial Eye
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 8:20 am
by NABOB OF NOWHERE
peerpee wrote:Has no-one else had a close look at the FAUST BD yet?
Thanks to you we've all cancelled our orders.
Re: Artificial Eye
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:29 am
by rattlebag
NABOB OF NOWHERE wrote:peerpee wrote:Has no-one else had a close look at the FAUST BD yet?
Thanks to you we've all cancelled our orders.
Seconded!
Re: Artificial Eye
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 5:35 pm
by Matt
Thirded.
Re: Artificial Eye
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 6:52 pm
by peerpee
Shitting hell. I was really looking forward to my first Sokurov on BD. It's terrible when a small but enthusiastic crowd of folk all bail on an anticipated release because of flaws that should have been caught in QC. If for some reason Sokurov stands by this master, I would ask "does he stand by this particular Blu-ray encode? Has he been shown the lines, and is he happy with that?"
Reminiscences of a retired producer #482: I once rejected a master of a film by a famous French director, and was told "the director is happy with this master, he has signed it off". I said "He can't have. He seriously can't have. The master is horizontally stretched, the lab have made a pig's ear of a 1.66:1 anamorphic master, and this is definitely not right." They insisted it was fine. I insisted it wasn't. I refused to budge. Weeks later they eventually called in the director to the lab to look at the master I rejected, he was horrified, and had them redo it in HD. The lab got a bollocking.
Re: Artificial Eye
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 7:33 pm
by Mathew2468
Was that Alain Resnais?
Re: Artificial Eye
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 7:58 pm
by zedz
(a bit late, but) Fourthed.
You're a regular Dr Mabuse, peerpee, orchestrating international market manipulations through the power of your mind.
Re: Artificial Eye
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 8:59 pm
by RossyG
Fifthed.
I had a nice under a tenner pre-order, too, but if it's buggered up I can't be bothered with the hassle.
What you've never seen you never miss.