Re: Forthcoming Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vol.
Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 12:18 am
Correct.captveg wrote:"Another Malick film from Warner Bros." - This would have to be The New World, right?
https://test.criterionforum.org/forum/
Correct.captveg wrote:"Another Malick film from Warner Bros." - This would have to be The New World, right?
And the reply was?SpiderBaby wrote:I did.swo17 wrote:The fact that no one even cared enough to ask about this is probably a sign of something in and of itself.SpiderBaby wrote:Would love to hear an answer on future WCF sets, the trouble with MoC doing them has me concerned.
Their Twitter serves as a bit of a recap.bamwc2 wrote:Damn. Have they released transcripts of these chats in the past?
They didn't accept the question. Got the No on Glauber Rocha, didn't answer the WCF question.bdsweeney wrote:And the reply was?SpiderBaby wrote: I did.
Last year I believe they mentioned Rublev is still a huge mess. Sounded like a proper restoration wasn't even planned, and it's going to need a lot of work.Gregory wrote:It would've been nice if someone had asked about Andrei Rublev instead of wasting time talking about things like whether Tootsie belongs in the Collection or not.
The last three are obviously out of the question, I could see Harry getting a release, but I think if any Allen movie is getting the treatment, it's Take the Money and Run (providing the phantom credits aren't a cruel joke on Criterion's behalf).ShellOilJunior wrote:I could see them doing Deconstructing Harry, Interiors, Another Woman or Stardust Memories.The Narrator Returns wrote:I'm preordering Hypothetical Woody Allen Release.
I don't think Woody would block a release because he doesn't want extras produced. I think he's fine with them as long as he doesn't have to participate. Although, he'd definitely approve the color timing and transfer but would opt for no director sticker.
I'd welcome it but won't get my hopes up too high. It may be very difficult to license. At least if one is going on the fact the Italian rights holders screening fee is about $1,335 for (1) showing of the film. This is about 3-5x the typical going rate of a classic film. I can't imagine what they'd ask for in a licensing deal.ianungstad wrote: Pasolini - Most likely Teorema. Koch Lorber disc has been out of print for years. I emailed Waterbearer films this past summer asking if they would work with Criterion on any of their Pasolini titles and they said no. I was also told that the masters they have are not suitable for blu release.
Warner is so silly about anniversaries that I wouldn't put it past them to let it sit all of next year and then announce a 50th anniversary edition for 2016. I'm surprised they haven't released it yet too but I'd also be a bit surprised if they licensed it to Criterion. It was nominated for every eligible Academy Award, and that's another thing Warner seems to place a lot of importance on.FrauBlucher wrote:The Warner agreement has piqued my interest about a certain title. Kim said, in the not so distant future for more WB titles.
It got me thinking of a phantom page that belongs to Mike Nichols and maybe the title is Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf. I've been surprised WB hasn't released this yet. I expected something after Elizabeth Taylor's death, and nothing. Over the summer I asked WAC on their twitter page and they answered with nothing going on with this title.
Agreed. The questions were infuriating. I'd have loved to know about Bunuel's future in the collection, or Visconti's or any number of recently neglected filmmakers with hard-to-see masterpieces, but instead we got "Why Armageddon?" and "More Wes Anderson?"Gregory wrote:It would've been nice if someone had asked about Andrei Rublev instead of wasting time talking about things like whether Tootsie belongs in the Collection or not.
I was there a couple years ago when they screened Sunday, Bloody Sunday and the attendance seemed about the same.ianungstad wrote:The mostly empty chairs during the Wexner panel was pretty depressing. Does anyone know how the forum traffic here has held up in recent years?
Not getting into numbers traffic hasn't gone down here, and has been going up on average each year. Summers get quite a bit heavier, though I'm unsure why.ianungstad wrote:The mostly empty chairs during the Wexner panel was pretty depressing. Does anyone know how the forum traffic here has held up in recent years?
That's an interesting thought. IFC initially released it (it's one of their highest grossing movies ever), and Miranda July's first novel is being released in January. I'm a big fan of M&Y&EWK, though, and as such can't help but think it's wishful thinking on my part.CSM126 wrote:For whatever reason, I had a dream about Criterion announcement day a couple nights ago (surely a sign of some kind of psychosis) and the one title that stuck in my memory was Me and You and Everyone We Know. So I'll guess that. Hopefully it wouldn't have the horrendous royal purple cover I saw in my dream.
Surely CC won't steer clear of the opportunity to package Warner Bros Antonioni titles BLOW UP & ZABRISKIE POINT on Blu Ray... Here's hoping they see sense!...captveg wrote:More Warner Bros. releases (plural).
"Big list [of WB titles] just went around [the Criterion office]. If half of that list is approved it will be a big thing."
Great news! Hope they'll include all three edits, including that elusive 150-minute premiere cut.sir_luke wrote:Correct.captveg wrote:"Another Malick film from Warner Bros." - This would have to be The New World, right?
Thank you for bringing this to my attention! I somehow missed the news of course.Drucker wrote:Of course, the BFI have released a blu-ray of it recently, and Criterion and BFI often use the same masters...