Page 73 of 98
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 3:10 am
by Murdoch
I like that the tagline reassures us that the Magic Museum does indeed have magic.
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 3:15 am
by domino harvey
Magic task number one: New wardrobe dept for film
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 4:17 am
by matrixschmatrix
Jeez, kid, stop strolling so casually, the velociraptor's already got the bottom half of one of your legs
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 5:03 am
by HistoryProf
Feego wrote:I'll admit that the current artwork is pretty lousy colorized photoshop, but wow! I think these new ones are godawful. We easily forget how beautiful Lucille Ball was, but this cover art sure does its best to make sure we keep forgetting.
You ain't kidding. I often bring her up as an example of a funny AND gorgeous woman and usually get funny looks. But she was a knockout.

Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 1:59 am
by Ashirg
Some of the CBS Home Video/Paramount/Amazon cover for made-on-demand releases are the worst.

Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:05 am
by domino harvey
I appreciate that they've adjusted the placement of the text on the cover to allow for a three-hole punch
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 3:00 am
by zedz
Isn't that the cover of the next Robert Pollard album?
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 6:38 pm
by colinr0380
Ashirg wrote:Some of the CBS Home Video/Paramount/Amazon cover for made-on-demand releases are the worst.

It is even worse when you see some of the older covers for the film which show what must be the untampered image:

So was removing everything but the top of the helmets of the guys carrying her not meant to be a funny image, just lazy cropping? Looking at it more closely it looks as if they have repositioned the helmets as well for some reason but have still kept the guy on the left tilting slightly! And what about the exchange of the locker room setting for a weird, non-perspective grassy landscape?
(I will admit that I did some research into the earlier cover because I had a moment of thinking "Is that...
Helen Hunt?!?" which sent me running for imdb. The film apparently also stars Daphne Zuniga, years before her mid-80s heyday in Rob Reiner's The Sure Thing and only a year after her debut role in the 'video nasty' Pranks!)
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 4:21 pm
by dx23
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 4:42 pm
by peerpee
Poor Sherilyn.
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2012 5:11 pm
by domino harvey
I for one can't wait to watch Bigfoot And Alice Cooper
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 12:45 pm
by manicsounds
I think Bigfoot IS Alice Cooper in this one...
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 3:11 pm
by Mr Sausage
And I for one can't wait to watch a movie where Bigfoot plays Alice Cooper.
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 11:21 am
by Siddon
manicsounds wrote:I think Bigfoot IS Alice Cooper in this one...
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1876261/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
You thought wrong
but Andre Royo(The Wire) and Bruce Davison(Harry and the Hendersons) are also in this they play Al Hunter and Sheriff Walt Henderson.
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 1:14 am
by Murdoch
A testament to Netflix's photoshop skills.

Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 1:37 am
by Cremildo
Little hands, large heads.

Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:07 pm
by dx23
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 9:19 am
by eerik
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 11:57 am
by skuhn8
How is the Nibelungen cover so bad? Looks pretty cool, actually.
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 12:37 pm
by Drucker
Catering to that Lord of The Rings-spillover crowd...?
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 2:45 pm
by swo17
The whole movie should be catnip to the LOTR crowd. That isn't false advertising at all.
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 5:09 pm
by Gregory
Like a lot of the old Kino DVD and VHS covers, this one looks so blatantly artificial and tacky that it cheapens the work. It looks like they're ashamed of the age of the film and are trying to conceal it rather than design something appropriate to the period that highlights it as an asset. And, to me at least, it screams out "dated set designs and special effects!" in a way the film certainly doesn't deserve. Partly because of the color and photoshopping in general (I find that old-fashioned typefaces generally look poor with a drop shadow, for one thing) but also because something about the way the dragon looks in the color image reminds me of Ollie from Kukla, Fran and Ollie.
Their original DVD cover was far better:

Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 8:03 pm
by stroszeck
I don't know why they don't keep the same covers as the posters and original VHS artwork these days. Companies like Shout, Criterion and even Twilight Time and Olive seem to be at least making attempts to stick with what works.
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 10:39 pm
by dx23
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 3:48 pm
by CSM126
Gregory wrote:Like a lot of the old Kino DVD and VHS covers, this one looks so blatantly artificial and tacky that it cheapens the work. It looks like they're ashamed of the age of the film and are trying to conceal it rather than design something appropriate to the period that highlights it as an asset. And, to me at least, it screams out "dated set designs and special effects!" in a way the film certainly doesn't deserve. Partly because of the color and photoshopping in general (I find that old-fashioned typefaces generally look poor with a drop shadow, for one thing) but also because something about the way the dragon looks in the color image reminds me of Ollie from Kukla, Fran and Ollie.
Their original DVD cover was far better:

If anything I think the new cover is better. That older cover is crowded and frankly kind of cheesy-looking. The new cover is kind of artificial, I'll grant you that, but it's balanced better and more attractive to the eye.