Page 74 of 98
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 3:52 pm
by The Narrator Returns
Do I just have a dirty mind, or does this look like the worst three-way ever?

Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 4:09 pm
by CSM126
If it was the Drew Barrymore version of Babes it would definitely be a three-way.
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 5:02 am
by dx23
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 10:18 am
by CSM126
I must have missed the scene in That's My Boy where Sandler did the old "Khali-Ma" trick.
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 3:20 am
by HistoryProf
the almost gave bud light a placement on the cover...then just changed it to schmidt's gay at the last second.
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 1:58 pm
by Murdoch
Is it so hard to put the names over the proper actors? Every fuckin cover, I swear
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 3:59 pm
by Gregory
That's never been the rule, as far as I can tell looking back to early film posters. They often just follow the order of billing.
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 5:25 pm
by Feego
I'm sure there are contractual obligations concerning the placement of names, and they won't always coincide with the positions of the actors in the photo.
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 6:22 pm
by Murdoch
It still bugs the hell out of me.
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 6:35 pm
by Brian C
Feego wrote:I'm sure there are contractual obligations concerning the placement of names, and they won't always coincide with the positions of the actors in the photo.
I think that's clearly the case, but that just begs the question: why not just reposition the actors? Actors' contracts are signed way before the publicity stills are shot (that is, when the art isn't photoshopped to begin with).
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 11:26 pm
by dx23
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 11:39 pm
by oldsheperd
dx23 wrote:
Those are a few things that should stay lost.
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 4:56 pm
by krnash
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 4:59 pm
by CSM126
Grand Hotel is apparently the story of an open casket funeral.
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 7:36 pm
by Matt
The film is about as much fun as one...
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 8:04 pm
by flyonthewall2983
dx23 wrote:
Does this include his NBC show, which just got canned? Seriously, how bad is it if NBC cancels it before it even airs???
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 10:55 pm
by dx23
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 12:44 am
by ianungstad
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 4:10 am
by tarpilot
Ahaha, that's cute
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 3:21 am
by Markson
An art director's ingenious solution for Harland's non-existent jawline.
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 7:10 am
by Saturnome

The "Timeless classic" being a Poverty Row flick, and sadly it's not about a killer, man-eating horse.
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2012 3:21 pm
by Gregory
Saturnome wrote:
Somehow that typeface doesn't look quite as good as it did on the early Dinosaur Jr. albums.

Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 12:59 am
by swo17
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 1:11 am
by Drucker
3 1/2 stars...Leonard Maltin
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 4:31 am
by dx23