Page 2 of 8

Re: Stephen King on Film

Posted: Tue May 05, 2015 8:08 pm
by domino harvey
Relevant response from the AV Club comments (not worth reading unless you want to read a hundred internet smartasses make variations on the same unfunny joke regarding the book's most contentious scene)
Yes, I could have Mark Rylance or Ben Mendelsohn, but I choose Will Poulter, said the person who went to a Michelin-starred restaurant and ordered Spam.

Re: Stephen King on Film

Posted: Tue May 05, 2015 8:30 pm
by swo17
Yeah, I'm all for casting nobodies over big names, but even I have a Ben Mendelsohn opt-out clause to that opinion.

Re: Stephen King on Film

Posted: Wed May 06, 2015 3:37 am
by bainbridgezu
Between this and the Joker, it's a rough time for scary clowns. At least that's now being downplayed as a focus group exercise.

I guess it's up to Josh Boone to deliver a casting announcement for The Stand that isn't thuddingly wrong-headed.

No, Georgie, not all Stephen King adaptations do float. Some sink like stone turds. Not that we needed another of those.

It (Andres Muschetti, 2017)

Posted: Mon May 25, 2015 9:58 pm
by Professor Wagstaff
Cary Fukunaga Exits It Due to Budget Constraints

My interest has officially died

Re: Stephen King on Film

Posted: Mon May 25, 2015 10:45 pm
by bainbridgezu
Is he taking Will Poulter with him?

Re: Stephen King on Film

Posted: Mon May 25, 2015 11:38 pm
by domino harvey
No doubt about it, New Line undercut all of his creative options 'til there was no reason to stick around. In a perfect world it'd just die already and let someone who cares about this project handle it later

Re: Stephen King on Film

Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2015 9:52 pm
by Jeff

Re: Stephen King on Film

Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2015 3:31 pm
by mfunk9786
With explicit instructions not to hire an young unknown actor who might very well be perfectly talented and a good fit for the role or everyone will throw a fit on the internet

Re: Stephen King on Film

Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2016 5:03 am
by domino harvey

Re: Stephen King on Film

Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2016 4:12 am
by domino harvey
I didn't think this was still happening but it is: first look at Stellan Skarsgard's other son as Pennywise in It. The kid who plays Mike on Stranger Things is Richie (beep beep)

Re: Stephen King on Film

Posted: Tue Jul 26, 2016 1:20 pm
by Dylan
Some recent set photos from the upcoming IT adaptation reveal (via the marquee of the movie theater) that the childhood section takes place in 1989 (where the kids apparently see Batman and/or Lethal Weapon 2... that's quite a difference from them seeing I Was a Teenage Werewolf). Also, this adaptation retains the Paul Bunyan statue.

Re: It (Andres Muschietti, 2017)

Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 2:18 pm
by domino harvey
Set picture of the House on Neibolt Street-- it looks like a Disneyland Halloween haunted house. What a never-ending bad joke this adaptation is turning out to be

Re: It (Andres Muschietti, 2017)

Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 7:12 pm
by CSM126
How hard could it possibly be to find an old run-down house? Jesus, that's barely worthy of Knotts Scary Farm, let alone Disney.

Re: It (Andres Muschietti, 2017)

Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 7:35 pm
by The Narrator Returns
This is shot by Park Chan-wook's regular cinematographer Chung-hoon Chung, so at the very least (about all we can expect from this at this point) it'll probably look nice.

Re: It (Andres Muschietti, 2017)

Posted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 6:44 pm
by domino harvey
Image

I thought they were remaking It, not Killer Klowns From Outer Space

Re: It (Andres Muschietti, 2017)

Posted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 6:46 pm
by mfunk9786
Guy has a side job at a production of Cats, so this is just more convenient

Re: It (Andres Muschietti, 2017)

Posted: Tue Mar 28, 2017 4:36 pm
by The Narrator Returns
Image

Re: It (Andres Muschietti, 2017)

Posted: Wed Mar 29, 2017 3:13 am
by Brian C
Something about that poster makes it feel extraordinarily misguided, and I can't quite put my finger on it. (I'm not being sarcastic)

Re: It (Andres Muschietti, 2017)

Posted: Wed Mar 29, 2017 4:03 pm
by The Narrator Returns

Re: It (Andres Muschietti, 2017)

Posted: Wed Mar 29, 2017 4:26 pm
by domino harvey
There were whole seconds in that trailer that were promising, unfortunately they were surrounded by everything else. Sped up frame rate, really? Are we sure this isn't set in a Marilyn Manson video circa mid 90s?

Re: It (Andres Muschietti, 2017)

Posted: Wed Mar 29, 2017 4:32 pm
by The Narrator Returns
I online-know someone who read Cary Fukunaga's draft of this, and apparently the trailer looks almost exactly like it. So make of that what you will.

Re: It (Andres Muschietti, 2017)

Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2017 12:50 am
by big ticket
The trailer may reflect the content of Fukunaga's script, but it certainly doesn't look like something he would have shot.

Re: It (Andres Muschietti, 2017)

Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2017 2:46 pm
by John Shade
This trailer kind of has the tone of the recent Insidious type movies. I wonder if the movie will kind of play off the recent success of "Stranger Things" or try to avoid that since those writers might have been involved in this at some point or something. The paper boat gliding down the street and the kid looking through the sewer is about the same as from the miniseries, just without the almost deep down sadistic humor of the way Tim Curry would say "Hi!", or later "beep beep". I also like when Tim Curry's clown shows up at the library and just says "A little young for ya" or something as the guy stares at the librarian.

Re: It (Andres Muschietti, 2017)

Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2017 7:06 pm
by beamish13
domino harvey wrote:There were whole seconds in that trailer that were promising, unfortunately they were surrounded by everything else. Sped up frame rate, really? Are we sure this isn't set in a Marilyn Manson video circa mid 90s?
Directors are still trying to catch up with what Adrian Lyne did in 1990.

Re: It (Andres Muschietti, 2017)

Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2017 7:01 pm
by domino harvey