criterionforum.org

I just knew that the bit in the release going out of its way to say the film is very commercial had to be a joke telegraphing it was indeed another Pynchon adaptation. Just seemed to me exactly the type of thing PTA would find funny to put out there considering the likely end product.

I don't think that was a joke - the book is one of Pynchon's most "commercial" and certainly has the right kind of action set pieces to earn a budget (plus, a hefty chunk of that is paying DiCaprio's salary). When I heard the release's budget comment, I instinctually looked up White Noise's to see if it was about the same (it is). I wouldn't think of either novel as requiring "big-budget commercial" resources offhand, but both have enough action and are more commercial than their authors' other works, and it makes sense why each director would lobby for the highest possible financing to successfully realise each project

I need to read Vineland again. I read it in 2015 in the wake of a post-Inherent Vice Pynchon binge, and prioritized it as maybe my third of his works, solely because I remember PTA mentioning in interviews around the time that he had wanted to make it into a movie long before Inherent Vice was even written. While reading, I tried imagining it as a PTA movie, and just couldn't figure out how he'd approach it tonally. It's wild that I may soon have the answer to that stray thought

Alana Haim, Teyana Taylor, Wood Harris, and Shayna "Junglepussy" McHayle have joined the cast, so even if it isn't Vineland, it's definitely a Support the Girls fan letter.

No Haley Lu Richardson, no sale

Coming out August 2025, in IMAX(!).

“$115,000,000 Pynchon adaptation on IMAX” comes like a screaming across the sky, and might also be the best indie revolt against the Marvel&co.franchise takeovers put to action yet (not that this won’t be fun popcorn fare too)

It sounds to me like a David Zaslav version of a Bialystock and Bloom scam where they spend millions and millions of dollars on a sure-fire flop so they can take a massive tax write-off. Congratulations to PTA for grabbing this perhaps once in a lifetime chance at a blockbuster budget. Kevin Costner, too.

The studios really are in their new Easy Riders, Raging Bulls/Pictures at a Revolution moment with underperforming comic book movies as the new Doctor Doolittle.

Well, my initial thought was that he pulled a wonderful trick on them, but, in a fitting Pynchon-esque revelation of anti-paranoia, it actually makes a ton of sense without looking at it conspiratorially. PTA has consistently brought in customers, has a strong fanbase, has demonstrated he can make "fun" movies and has been vocal about supporting Marvel et al. and finding joy in them, is adapting material that will be fun, and has big-name people still itching to work with him. The Pynchon factor won't actually matter here next to all the green lights for risk management. It just happens that PTA evidenced his ability to make this work, and convinced people accordingly. I'd be shocked if Leo didn't have the kind of pull where either it's in a contract or a studio would be too afraid to bury a picture of his.

therewillbeblus wrote: Wed Mar 13, 2024 8:42 pmI'd be shocked if Leo didn't have the kind of pull where either it's in a contract or a studio would be too afraid to bury a picture of his.

Imminent Don's Plum moment is always possible, but I'm reminded more of PTA's insistence re: his other Pynchon adaptation, for which he kept refusing to take credit for in a few interviews in lieu of merely being a vessel ("it's not my movie..."), in which case it's a joke about a joke about an eventual $22 blu ray (no 4k!) that happens to have both of their names on it.

The title for this is allegedly the Battle of Baktan Cross (or at least until it changes to Vineland)

The funeral program for this film’s assistant director, who died unexpectedly shortly following the conclusion of filming, now alleges the title of this film to be One Battle After Another. More than anything, this reminds me of when I was going through back issues of American Cinematographer and saw a heartfelt tribute from the magazine to the DPs of the upcoming awards season films of that year, among which was listed "'Untitled Woody Allen Project' (Vittorio Storaro)". (It was Café Society.)

Current cut is three hours and will be test screening this week

domino harvey wrote: Tue Jan 21, 2025 7:32 pm Current cut is three hours and will be test screening this week

Has Anderson ever willingly done that before? I thought Hard Eight was, but that was it

It's a massive budget, might be contractual

beamish14 wrote: Tue Jan 21, 2025 8:48 pm

domino harvey wrote: Tue Jan 21, 2025 7:32 pm Current cut is three hours and will be test screening this week

Has Anderson ever willingly done that before? I thought Hard Eight was, but that was it

PTA talks about a test screening for Boogie Nights in this clip, which I believe is from the commentary track (contains a plot spoiler): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=krrrLBKzlLg

One Battle After Another is the title as confirmed by PTA at the November screening

Ghetto. Pat.

A PTA action movie, hell yeah bros

I'm quite excited by the cited Something Wild and Repo Man influences.

Finch wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 3:36 am I'm quite excited by the cited Something Wild and Repo Man influences.

He’s frequently cited Repo Man and Poltergeist III
for their cinematography

Finch wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 3:36 am I'm quite excited by the cited Something Wild and Repo Man influences.

I mean, I loved Inherent Vice but if you can find the alleged ZAZ influences in it, you're better at this game than I am!

domino harvey wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 5:09 pm

Finch wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 3:36 am I'm quite excited by the cited Something Wild and Repo Man influences.

I mean, I loved Inherent Vice but if you can find the alleged ZAZ influences in it, you're better at this game than I am!

this is the same director that labeled his own movie a "Cheech and Chong movie"

Way back when, PTA cited Something Wild as a primary influence on Boogie Nights, specifically the way it turns abruptly from a freewheeling comedy into a harrowing drama. It's clearly a film that made a huge impact on him if he's going back to that well again.

ryannichols7 wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 9:50 pm

domino harvey wrote: Sun Jan 26, 2025 5:09 pm

Finch wrote: Sat Jan 25, 2025 3:36 am I'm quite excited by the cited Something Wild and Repo Man influences.

I mean, I loved Inherent Vice but if you can find the alleged ZAZ influences in it, you're better at this game than I am!

this is the same director that labeled his own movie a "Cheech and Chong movie"

I took that to mean a stoner movie, and it's pretty spot-on. (Also why it did nothing for me, sorry.)

WGA website officially credits this as “Inspired by the novel ‘Vineland’ by Thomas Pynchon,” in case there were any doubts