Page 2 of 5
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 4:23 am
by cbernard
I like the fact that Bruce Willis looks, from some angles, almost exactly like a young Eli Wallach.
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 6:37 am
by milk114
friends who drool at the mention of her name have said that they'd read in interviews that she will never do nude scenes for films or print. So why cast her at all as a stripper? There are plenty of women who would take their clothes off and dance on a pole (probably a lot better than she can, given Honey). But I think Alba was cast partly because she is a commodified name brand with a small sci-fi fanbase that will be growing in months with her involvement in Fantastic Four. I think also that to make a dancer in a sleazy bar attractive/sexy/all the qualities one would expect from a stripper while fully clothed will be much more challenging for the actress and director, sort of the Victorian notion of modesty being sexier than nudity. Though I haven't seen Alba in anything I get the impression that beyond good looks she doesn't leave an impression. Possibly Rodriguez and Miller are banking on the actrress's appealing "innocence" to heighten that of the character. And I do believe this will be an R-rating in the U.S., but remember that violence allowable but sex is not the the current political climate, so I would expect the rating for booze and bullets, not broads.
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 2:10 pm
by Fletch F. Fletch
milk114 wrote:But I think Alba was cast partly because she is a commodified name brand with a small sci-fi fanbase that will be growing in months with her involvement in Fantastic Four. I think also that to make a dancer in a sleazy bar attractive/sexy/all the qualities one would expect from a stripper while fully clothed will be much more challenging for the actress and director, sort of the Victorian notion of modesty being sexier than nudity. Though I haven't seen Alba in anything I get the impression that beyond good looks she doesn't leave an impression. Possibly Rodriguez and Miller are banking on the actrress's appealing "innocence" to heighten that of the character. And I do believe this will be an R-rating in the U.S., but remember that violence allowable but sex is not the the current political climate, so I would expect the rating for booze and bullets, not broads.
Yeah, I read somewhere that Frank Miller said that they weren't going to shy away from the violence in the comic book and depicting a lot of it in B&W will help them avoid an NC-17 rating. As for the casting of Alba... yeah, obviously, they were going for a name that will fill seats as she's got a considerable fan base already. It's too bad because she doesn't really resemble Nancy in any way.
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 2:26 pm
by Fletch F. Fletch
The official site is now online:
http://www.sincitythemovie.com/
There are lots of goodies: wallpaper, icons, a game, picture gallery, etc.
Very nice...
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2005 2:13 pm
by Fletch F. Fletch
the new trailer is up... looks very good and with footage of more of the cast:
http://movies.channel.aol.com/franchise ... city_movie
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 5:22 am
by hearthesilence
Funny, I just got a call from a marketing firm, asking about motion pictures I've seen or not, and THIS was one of them, as well as a dozen other pictures that were STILL UNRELEASED. And I asked them, "ROBOTS? SIN CITY? I thought those weren't out yet." Doubt it was a scam (caller ID, done this before, the questions, etc.), but still....
Anyway, this looks like it can go either way, REALLY BAD or REALLY GOOD. The make-up is a GUTSY move, but the right move. I haven't collected comics since I was a kid, but I remember thinking how no comic book picture can ever match the comic - especially if it's a great comic with a really strong, distinct style - because everything has to look like the real world. I'd always rationalize it, thinking, "If things looked like a Frank Miller/Todd McFarlane/etc. drawing in a live-action picture, it would look REALLY BAD, it can only work on paper, etc." but still lament the decision.
I guess we'll see how it plays with the public.
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2005 2:16 pm
by Fletch F. Fletch
hearthesilence wrote:I guess we'll see how it plays with the public.
The key to the faithfulness will be if they retain the comic's ultraviolence and don't wimp out with a PG-13 rating to fill seats.
I get the feeling that this movie will go the same route as
Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow and become a cult film on DVD. Despite the all-star cast it will probably be too extreme, too stylized for mainstream audiences and will probably disappear fast after a strong opening weekend.
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 1:59 pm
by Fletch F. Fletch
Here's a good link to a bunch of new TV spots for the movie:
http://www.themoviebox.net/movies/2005/ ... railer.php
Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 5:41 pm
by Fletch F. Fletch
A good collection of pics, posters, links to articles, etc.
http://www.joblo.com/upcomingmovies/movies.php?id=309
Also, an
11 minute featurette is online:
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 4:11 pm
by Elephant
Saw this one last night. Miller was there and had some funny comments before the movie ("In the comics industry we've been acting like film's retarded second cousin for too long"). It was one of the most purely entertaining films I've seen in a while--its two-hour running time felt like forty-five minutes. The ONLY way they avoided the NC-17 on this one is stylizing everything so much--there's so much dismemberment, decapitation, and worse--and it's all vicious and ceaseless. It seems like this is going to be far too violent to really do a lot of business in the theaters, probably the DVD is going to recoup the budget on this one.
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 4:40 pm
by The Invunche
Jessica Alba's nipples would have made it better.
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2005 5:01 pm
by cdnchris
The Invunche wrote:Jessica Alba's nipples would have made it better.
Rosario Dawson's, too. Which reminds me that I have to rent Alexander when it's on DVD.
I've become intrigued by this one since I've seen the trailers. I don't know the comic book AT ALL but I think the film looks interesting. My wife actually wants to see this, too, so I think we're seeing it this weekend.
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2005 7:54 am
by lord_clyde
Harry Knowles and Roger Ebert have posted gushing reviews. I can't wait!
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2005 11:12 am
by The Invunche
Fat bastards.
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2005 11:14 am
by Morbii
Just got back from seeing it... good stuff!
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2005 11:37 am
by THX1378
Just got in from seeing it at the midnight screening. Must say that it blew everyone away that saw it. Even Mickey Rourke, whom really hasn't had a major part in a movie in a long, long time, does a great job here as Marv. It was nice to see him get a major part in a film that I hope will help him get some sort of a comeback from. Sin City is going to be the Kill Bill of this year, and so far it's the best film I've seen in a theater this year.
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:00 pm
by The Invunche
I sure hope it's a lot better than Kill Bill.
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2005 1:09 pm
by Napoleon
Somebody put 'The Invunche' out of his misery and bite at his bait. Come on people!
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2005 2:29 pm
by The Invunche
No bait and no misery.
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2005 8:08 pm
by Oedipax
I'm with Invunche. In a strange way I'm hoping this is the film I wanted Kill Bill to be - violent, fun, highly stylized, and so on...
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2005 8:43 pm
by lord_clyde
Kill Bill was viotent, stylized and a hell of a lot of fun! Just saw Sin City myself, very pleased to see Mr. Rodriguez finally tap his own potential. A bit on the long side, but it's bloody, pulpy fun.
Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2005 4:03 am
by The Invunche
Except form Harry Knowles and here, I'm hearing really terrible things about this movie.
Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2005 6:19 am
by lord_clyde
Well it's got a 78% on the Tomatometer if that helps. I really enjoyed the film, very dark and extremely violent. Definitely not a movie for people who can't stand noir dialogue and beating of women (not saying I condone the beating of women or the beating of anybody for that matter, but I know people are particularly sensitive when it comes to that) or multiple castrations. It's worth checking out for Mickey Rourke as Marv and Elijah Wood as Kevin (having trouble thinking of a single more frightening character in the movies) though. Great flick, I don't think there will be many better films this year.
Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2005 6:47 am
by dx23
Harry Knowles. Ugh!!! I really don't care at all about his opinion since he comes as a tool when he open his mouth.
As for Sin City, I just went to see it and I found it very entertaining although it seems to drag for a while. It is very true that the film is more style than substance but most of the performances are amazing except fro Brittany Murphy, who can't act her way out of a paper bag. Rourke, Elijah Wood, Bruce Willis, Clive Owen and even Jessica Alba gave exceptional performances that carried the substance of the film and brought to life replicas of their comic book counterparts.
I absolutely loved that most scenes where exactly as the comic book including the memorable Marv jumping out of the window scene.
My only complain is that I'm not enjoying anymore the theater experience. My cinema was filled with stupid teens that go to the movies to socialize instead of watching the film. To many other obnoxious people making unnecessary out loud comments on the nude or violent scenes and the occasional ditz who couldn't follow the story and began asking out loud "WHAT HAPPENED?" every single time they got lost. I'm a patient guy, but really, people are becoming a pest at the theaters and the imbeciles ushers don't do anything about it. Completely disrespectful.
Wow! Blew off some steam.
Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2005 9:11 am
by dekadetia
dx23 wrote:My cinema was filled with stupid teens that go to the movies to socialize instead of watching the film.
Two of my fellow viewers tonight got into a scuffle early on in the "Big Fat Kill" storyline. Nothing like a reminder of the possibility of real life violence to place you at a distance from the stylized.