Page 2 of 5
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 10:34 pm
by kaujot
I assumed the short would be on it, but it's nice to have actual confirmation.
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 9:05 pm
by LightBulbFilm
Do you think they'll throw some of the commericals he directed on this?
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 5:32 am
by macaca
LightBulbFilm wrote:Do you think they'll throw some of the commericals he directed on this?
no. although im pretty sure theyll throw the american express commerical on the darjeeling limited dvd. im pretty sure it was filmed around the same time as hotel chevalier.
Re: 450 Bottle Rocket
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 7:46 pm
by mfunk9786
Criterion wrote:- Commentary by director/co-writer Anderson and co-writer/star Owen Wilson
- PLUS: A booklet featuring an essay by executive producer James L. Brooks, an appreciation by Martin Scorsese
They could package this in a brown paper bag and I'd still be excited about this release.
Criterion wrote:and original artwork by Ian Dingman
Does this include the cover? It looks Eric Anderson-ish, but it would explain why it looks so crappy, as opposed to his other work.
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 8:18 pm
by Narshty
After Tenenbaums, this is certainly his funniest, most succesful film. It's quite a treat.
I suppose "The Shafrazi Lectures, no. 1: Bottle Rocket" is this release's comedy extra (like The Peter Bradley Show and Mondo Monda)?
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 8:31 pm
by Cronenfly
Bottle Rocket Blu-Ray page. (cross-posted with the CC BR thread)
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 8:53 pm
by zombeaner
I haven't seen this film in about 10 years. It'll be interesting to revisit. I love all of Anderson's work since then.
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:40 pm
by kaujot
I really hope the commentary was recorded with Anderson and Wilson together, not separately. That really bugged me about Rushmore's commentary.
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:53 pm
by Svevan
Joined individual commentaries tend to have more detail (like Rushmore's), while dual commentaries can be so self-serving and dull. An exception is Life Aquatic's restaurant commentary which was pretty well-planned by Anderson and Baumbach.
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:54 pm
by Narshty
Svevan wrote:Joined individual commentaries tend to have more detail (like Rushmore's), while dual commentaries can be so self-serving and dull. An exception is Life Aquatic's restaurant commentary which was pretty well-planned by Anderson and Baumbach.
Or pieced together from a much longer discussion/interview session with the restaurant noise used to mask edits. (Just a possibility.)
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:58 pm
by kaujot
Svevan wrote:Joined individual commentaries tend to have more detail (like Rushmore's), while dual commentaries can be so self-serving and dull. An exception is Life Aquatic's restaurant commentary which was pretty well-planned by Anderson and Baumbach.
I like interaction between the people talking. A great example is the commentary Soderbergh and someone else (don't feel like looking the specs up) did for
The Third Man, or the commentary for
Days of Heaven.
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 10:01 pm
by domino harvey
Soderbergh plus anyone in a commentary is a guaranteed good time. And it was Tony Gilroy, the director of Michael Clayton
Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 10:04 pm
by Svevan
Narshty wrote:Svevan wrote:Joined individual commentaries tend to have more detail (like Rushmore's), while dual commentaries can be so self-serving and dull. An exception is Life Aquatic's restaurant commentary which was pretty well-planned by Anderson and Baumbach.
Or pieced together from a much longer discussion/interview session with the restaurant noise used to mask edits. (Just a possibility.)
I seem to remember hearing something that made it seem kind of obvious that they were actually there (perhaps interaction with a waiter or something). Anyways, nothing would surprise me. It was a good joke, and I enjoyed the commentary well enough.
My Anderson-fandom-ism is waning after some recent reviewings of his work, and though I'll probably pick up this disc I'm worried I'm going to hate it. It's been probably 6 or 7 years since I saw it, and even then it seemed like "minor" Anderson.
Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 4:28 pm
by DignanSWE
I guess Barry Braverman is a pseudonym (of Wes Anderson)
EDIT: Sorry about that.
Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 5:01 pm
by macaca
DignanSWE wrote:I guess Barry Braverman is a pseudonym (of Wes Anderson)
No.
AND why on Earth didn't Eric Anderson illustrate the cover?
I guess he's busy writing books, but this DVD has been in the works for what seems like years, so I'm sure it could have been done. I'm really surprised Wes would want a kind-of 'rip off' version instead.
Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 5:45 pm
by pianocrash
DignanSWE wrote:I guess Barry Braverman is a pseudonym (of Wes Anderson)

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 8:40 pm
by Fletch F. Fletch
Finally! It's nice to see such an extras-heavy edition which is hardly surprising considering what Anderson has done with past Criterion editions of his films. I am really curious to hear the commentary track on this one and, as others have pointed out, it would be nice if they recorded Anderson and Wilson together but considering how busy both of them are it's probably doubtful.
Bottle Rocket
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 1:25 am
by CA Rodgers
As far as Was Anderson goes... he on of the best film makers today. And I always thought Bottle Rocket was a good first movie, though the films have gotten better over the years. Bottle Rocket was one of those movies that made you feel really warm and good inside. It wasn't trying to be anything, you could tell it was a guy who just really wanted to make a funny ass movie.
The order for me is. The Royal Tennenbaums, The Darjeeling Limited, Rushmore, Life Aquatic, Bottle Rocket.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 1:29 am
by psufootball07
Hmmm...I would put Rushmore on top, and also Life Aquatic at its worst. Bottle Rocket may have been his beginnings and clearly not his best, but Life Aquatic just didnt work for me, and I know many other people feel that Life Aquatic was a real disappointment for the cast that it had.
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 1:48 am
by swo17
Um,
Rushmore is on top, obviously.
Actually, I'm of the opinion that every film of Anderson's after
Rushmore has been a slightly paler photocopy of the film that preceded it. (Though "slightly" is being generous for
Darjeeling.)
Bottle Rocket, however, is another animal entirely. It's Anderson's only real straight-up comedy, without the attempt at depth of his later work, but I think it pulls that off quite nicely. I actually know people who
only like
Bottle Rocket, and not
Rushmore or
Tenenbaums.

Re: 450 Bottle Rocket
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 10:09 pm
by mfunk9786
Is anyone else just waiting to hear that this is delayed? All the other November releases [sans the now delayed Blu-Rays] have long since been reviewed and Beavered. I'm hoping this still comes out on the 25th, but I'm not holding my breath.
Re: 450 Bottle Rocket
Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 8:26 pm
by cdnchris
Re: 450 Bottle Rocket
Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 8:53 pm
by Eurotrash
Yellow subs on a Criterion? I guess that would be a first for them...
Re: 450 Bottle Rocket
Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 8:55 pm
by domino harvey
Another obnoxious, "wacky" addition from Wes Anderson
Re: 450 Bottle Rocket
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 12:47 am
by Abulafia
Looking at the timing on the CC disc on Beaver, I'm not convinced that the warmer tones are what was originally shot. Anderson, on a number of occasions, has pointed out that Bottle Rocket was a lot more minimalistic and muted than his subsequent pictures. It feels a little like the grade has been matched to Rushmore onward, though I must confess I have never seen the film projected.