Page 2 of 6
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:15 pm
by Barmy
Beyond terrible. It's back to the shouty schtick I see. Only the two chicks emerge unscathed. #-o #-o #-o
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 8:18 pm
by tavernier
Barmy wrote:shouty schtick
Once again, Barmy distills their essence in two words.
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 12:24 pm
by exte
That is an ALL-STAR cast! Its the most likable I've perhaps ever seen Brad Pitt. And I'm glad to see the Coens added JK Simmons to their roster. (Does he in fact repeat the 'who's the father' line here from Juno?)
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 1:39 pm
by flyonthewall2983
J.K. was in Ladykillers too. It really shows his range that I barely think about his character on Oz whenever he's in something. That guy was a bonafide sonofabitch.
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:35 am
by AWA
Jeff wrote:The Coens did make a point of using Lubezki instead Deakins, and are
apparently going for a "handheld verite-style" style production, so the RED would make sense.
While this is obviously not shot on a Red, I would like to add the Red weighs a massive amount and one of it's drawbacks is that it makes handheld and stedi-cam shooting almost impossible when fully assembled. I was looking at one tonight and it weighs a TON.
There is a great thread over at RedUser.net called
"Ask David Mullen Anything", and it lives up to it's name - 117 pages worth. If anyone is interested in cinematography, specifically digital / RED camera work, that is worth checking out.
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 4:02 am
by miless
maybe with the Red camera we'll go back to the old days of splitting a set apart to accommodate for a dolly shot.
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 12:16 am
by domino harvey
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 12:22 am
by moviscop
I like the cover, it kinda reminds me of Branded to Kill's cover. The font and also the sort of feeling it gives off, comedic.

Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 12:28 am
by kaujot
Great poster.
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 12:31 am
by Jeff
That's great. The font has a fun Saul Bass vibe, but the figures are lifted from someplace else that I can't put my finger on. Good tagline too.
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 12:35 am
by rumz
Fucking shit that's the coolest poster I've seen for a new film in years
Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 12:21 am
by Antoine Doinel
International
teaser trailer.
Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 6:08 am
by Max von Mayerling
I think this is by far the best trailer I've seen in a while. It could easily be better than the film, but I hope not. I don't think they've hit it out of the park since the Big Lebowski, Oscars notwithstanding, and I smell the possibility that they might be on to something here. They crafted a fine trailer in any case, which is worth its weight in shit. Or whatever else you care to weigh.
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 11:26 pm
by Len
Am I the only one who's just absolutely thrilled to see David Rasche getting some work every now and then?
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 11:34 pm
by Jeff
Len wrote:Am I the only one who's just absolutely thrilled to see David Rasche getting some work every now and then?
I grinned when he showed up in the trailer. The Coens have a knack for casting character roles like this with unusual choices. Good job getting the gig, Sledge!
Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 12:29 am
by Magic Hate Ball
Amazing poster. With our luck, the DVD will be a bunch of big heads.
Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 7:07 pm
by domino harvey
Two more posters

Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 7:12 pm
by Antoine Doinel
Magic Hate Ball wrote:Amazing poster. With our luck, the DVD will be a bunch of big heads.
Or that ugly poster above with Brad "Hang Ten" Pitt.
Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 11:00 pm
by dave41n
moviscop wrote:I like the cover, it kinda reminds me of Branded to Kill's cover.
The poster reminded me immediately of Penguin's Raymond Chandler
covers. Must be the same designer (Steve Marking), no?


Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 11:10 pm
by domino harvey
They're all Saul Bass riffs
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 3:18 am
by Dylan
The poster's great, but... can we hope for a Saul Bass-style title sequence to go with it?
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 8:01 pm
by Jeff
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 9:18 pm
by Finch
So far, the posters have made a greater impression on me than any of the trailers. If I hadn't known beforehand that this is a Coens film I'd have passed this up because the trailers just aren't selling it for me. So far, the "shouty schtick" reminds me of the likes of Raising Arizona which has always been a lesser Coen effort for me but I'm hoping that the trailer stuff will work much better in context. What I do like so far is that it goes against expectations of what the next Coens film should be after No Country for Old Men (which I've seen only once so far and need to see a few more times before I can decide where to place it within their body of work: I thought it was good but it didn't floor me). To me, it feels like 1998 again when The Big Lebowski followed on Fargo, and Burn After Reading, to me, provokes a similar "Huh? What is THIS?" reaction.
Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 3:32 am
by Max von Mayerling
Well, certainly, this could suck, but from my small corner of the Earth, the Big Lebowski is their best effort to date, so your comparison is encouraging in that regard. Best when they don't take themselves too seriously, because methinks they surrender their gift for baking an absurd cake o' life.
Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 8:27 pm
by margot
I don't know what happened but I saw the trailer in theaters instead of on my computer and I'm now intensely excited for this movie.