Page 11 of 11

Re: Paul Schrader

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2026 10:26 pm
by John Cope
To indicate the disparity of opinion that is possible here I can say that I much prefer Master Gardener to either of the other entries in the "man in a room" trilogy and prefer by far Light Sleeper, which I consider to be the progenitor of that entire series (it's even explicitly referenced in Card Counter), to any of them (but this is far from a surprise as it's one of my favorite films). I am, however, very much looking forward to the forthcoming The Basics of Philosophy as an extension of the series; it actually sounds like a fine complement in its perversity (and possibly in tone too) to Schrader's earlier and still profoundly underrated Forever Mine.

Re: Paul Schrader

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2026 10:30 pm
by knives
I agree with you Cope.

Re: Paul Schrader

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2026 11:27 pm
by wattsup32
Lowry_Sam wrote: Tue Sep 08, 2026 8:53 pm
domino harvey wrote: Tue Sep 08, 2026 8:33 pm That’s a long way from it being one of maybe three films showing any talent, though. I think you forgot about this movie when you made your claim and are now pretending it still works with it
No it was one of the 3.
What were the other two?

Re: Paul Schrader

Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2026 12:23 am
by Never Cursed
No polite way to say it: The Basics of Philosophy is one of the worst, most worthless films I have ever seen from a director that ostensibly knows better, or at least knew better. It is obviously a filmed first draft (to an extent that it makes some of Woody Allen's recent fare appear mannered and worked-over) and lacks all of the earnest humanity, introspection, or menace found in the writer's superior work. Schrader's characters never hid their purposes or destinations from the viewer, but they are completely functional and flavorless here, uttering the minimum of schematic dialogue required to advance a shamelessly self-serving plot about how sexual predators deserve to be forgiven. If anyone else involved with the film (several reasonably famous actors, including one big-name previous collaborator in a surprise cameo, cinematographer Sean Price Williams) did more than what was necessary to complete the film and cash a paycheck, their efforts are not recognizable in the final product. The movie is morally and artistically empty, and I don't have much more to say about it beyond shaming the film festivals that platformed this garbage. I can't believe I held out hope that it would be any good at all.