Inglourious Basterds
Moderators: MichaelB, yoloswegmaster
-
rs98762001
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 10:04 pm
Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)
Still looks like a mess.
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm
Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)
For all the jokes I ever made about this film, I honestly had no idea it would look this absurdly bad
- Foam
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 4:47 am
Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)
Pitt's accent is not only bad but inconsistent. When he says "or not" around 1:17 he sounds like DiCaprio's Howard Hughes.
- Joe Buck
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 10:59 pm
- Location: New York
Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)
I have seen nothing regarding this film that looks even remotely interesting to me.
- Dr. Snaut
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 7:53 pm
Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)
The trailers almost look intentionally bad. I have never judged a movie by it's trailer, as I have seen some awesome movies with terrible trailers, and vice-a-versa.
Having liked most of what Tarantino has put out, I look forward to this film.
Having liked most of what Tarantino has put out, I look forward to this film.
-
filmnoir1
- Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 3:36 am
Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)
Nick James's review in the latest issue of Sight and Sound nails Tarantino and the film arguing that is a example of "cinematic indigestion" because the film is merely a composite of countless other films that have come before this one; from Fuller's Big Red One to Melville's Army of Shadows. Yet, as James brilliantly points out what separates Tarantino from his idols is that he does not have the intelligence necessary or political acumen to understand what these filmmakers were trying to say with their films. Instead he views them as "cool" documents of violence, and excess without ever really investigating the larger ramifications and impetus for the producing of these men's films. I will see this, only because as a film scholar it is important to have knowledge of what is being produced at this time, but I am certain that Tarantino will never mature into a great filmmaker. Rather he shall continue to be the edgy Michael Bay.
-
rs98762001
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 10:04 pm
Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)
Yup. It's pretty amazing that Tarantino's least infantile film was his debut.
- Napier
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:48 pm
- Location: The Shire
Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)
He's suffering from an advanced case of Benjamin Button.
- Dr. Snaut
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 7:53 pm
Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)
Really? I thought he peaked with Pulp Fiction, and then his work slowly dwindled in terms of narrative and style in his later films. I would consider his work after Pulp Fiction "guilty pleasures" for me, but in no way illustrations of great film making.rs98762001 wrote:Yup. It's pretty amazing that Tarantino's least infantile film was his debut.
However, I think Tarantino is capable of being a great film maker once he is able to find a subject that is personal enough for him to expose some emotion of his own. Clearly, his greatest flaw is allowing others careers and work to be the bedrock of his films.
- knives
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm
Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)
I'd say that Jackie Brown was his last film before degrading completely into 'look what movies I've seen' mode. It also is his film with the strongest characters.
- Highway 61
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:40 pm
Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)
Agreed. It's also very well directed. In particular, Tarantino shows an incredible facility with close-ups. He uses them here constantly, holds them for a longer than average length, but always seems to know when to cut away before the device loses its power. Everything he's done since is shit, and I have no doubt that this will be his nadir.knives wrote:I'd say that Jackie Brown was his last film before degrading completely into 'look what movies I've seen' mode. It also is his film with the strongest characters.
- Antoine Doinel
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
- Location: Montreal, Quebec
- Contact:
- bunuelian
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 3:49 pm
- Location: San Diego
Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)
On a recent trip back from Europe I watched both Kill Bill volumes on the plane and enjoyed them as style-laden and absurd. That's about all I can say for it, it's a great movie for a plane ride. Not one I'd buy for my library, though.
This movie looks pretty awful. It's the first of his since Pulp Fiction that I've not been interested in seeing in the theater.
This movie looks pretty awful. It's the first of his since Pulp Fiction that I've not been interested in seeing in the theater.
- Antoine Doinel
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
- Location: Montreal, Quebec
- Contact:
- Finch
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 9:09 pm
- Location: United States
Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)
This is the third or fourth trailer now and they still don't seem certain how to sell it - not a good sign. I still want to see it for myself but I hope Quentin has it in him to pull off another film like Jackie Brown which I feel is his one film that can lay a claim to being a masterpiece. I don't think he's been as efficient, sophisticated, tender and grown-up again as in this film. Get QT to adapt another Elmore Leonard book, or better still, a James Ellroy novel (White Jazz?).
- Antoine Doinel
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
- Location: Montreal, Quebec
- Contact:
Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)
I'm not surprised the trailers are a bit all over the place, given that the film is supposedly mixing a whole bunch of thematic styles. That said, when Eli Roth seems to be giving the most restrained performance, that can't be a good thing.
- Antoine Doinel
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
- Location: Montreal, Quebec
- Contact:
Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)
The Weinsteins are desperate to make sure guys will go see this.
- Antoine Doinel
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
- Location: Montreal, Quebec
- Contact:
Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)
Tarantino confirms the final cut will run one minute longer than what was shown at Cannes.
- bearcuborg
- Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 6:30 am
- Location: Philadelphia via Chicago
Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)
You don't write like a film scholar.filmnoir1 wrote:Nick James's review in the latest issue of Sight and Sound nails Tarantino and the film arguing that is a example of "cinematic indigestion" because the film is merely a composite of countless other films that have come before this one; from Fuller's Big Red One to Melville's Army of Shadows. Yet, as James brilliantly points out what separates Tarantino from his idols is that he does not have the intelligence necessary or political acumen to understand what these filmmakers were trying to say with their films. Instead he views them as "cool" documents of violence, and excess without ever really investigating the larger ramifications and impetus for the producing of these men's films. I will see this, only because as a film scholar it is important to have knowledge of what is being produced at this time, but I am certain that Tarantino will never mature into a great filmmaker. Rather he shall continue to be the edgy Michael Bay.
- knives
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm
- Murdoch
- Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 3:59 am
- Location: Upstate NY
Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)
Is this the first time a producer has publically panned his own film?
- Antoine Doinel
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
- Location: Montreal, Quebec
- Contact:
Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)
ContactMusic is notoriously unreliable for their "news" so take that item with a gigantic box of salt.
- Zumpano
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 3:43 pm
- Location: Seattle, WA
Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)
Yeah, funny how those quotes aren't in the actual GQ interview that was previously posted above.Antoine Doinel wrote:ContactMusic is notoriously unreliable for their "news" so take that item with a gigantic box of salt.
Edit: I'm sorry. This quote is in there:
So, you know, it's partly accurate.What’s the prequel?
I’m not tellin’ you! [But] Brad wants to do Inglorious II. We all want to do it. And the movie hasn’t even come out yet!
- Cold Bishop
- Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:45 am
- Location: Portland, OR
Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)
Isn't the "Jaw" line stolen ad-verbatim from a bad Cannes review?
- knives
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 10:49 pm
Re: Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino, 2009)
It's fake? Damn it and I thought that was funny.