Page 13 of 43
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:42 pm
by mfunk9786
Hmmmmm, I wonder if it's worth buying for half the book.
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:05 pm
by tavernier
then send me the other half
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2011 7:04 pm
by mfunk9786
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2011 7:42 pm
by swo17
What, they couldn't find any nuts and/or gum? Or jagged metal Krusty-O's? I'm honestly curious whether someone could survive that.
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2011 7:55 pm
by mfunk9786
I'm disappointed to not see the space-age moon waffle.
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2011 10:28 pm
by matrixschmatrix
They could have at least tried to make Homer's homemade Prozac.
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2011 11:31 pm
by dx23
Or a Flaming Moe.
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2011 11:59 pm
by Saturnome
And what about Chocolate Land? The forbidden donut? A Jimbo Burger? what a bunch of hacks
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 1:41 am
by Mr Sausage
They're missing my personal favourite, Homer's waffle: a half-cooked mass of batter wrapped around a whole stick of butter.
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 1:48 am
by knives
I know it's not a unique thing, but it would have been fun to see them mold a Gummi de Milo.
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 3:41 am
by dx23
Mr Sausage wrote:They're missing my personal favourite, Homer's waffle: a half-cooked mass of batter wrapped around a whole stick of butter.
I actually tried another of Homer's butter recipes: bacon wrapped around a cube of butter. That certainly took 5 years off my life.
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 5:26 pm
by Askew
I can't believe they didn't do the good morning burger.
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 3:38 pm
by mfunk9786
Entertainment Weekly's Fall TV Preview wrote:[The Simpsons returns with] a parody of The Diving Bell and the Butterfly in which a paralyzed Homer can only communicate through farting.
Oh, how far this show has fallen.
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 3:42 pm
by HypnoHelioStaticStasis
That... can't... that can't be for real...
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 3:46 pm
by mfunk9786
That's those fifth-rate Harvard writers for you.
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 3:50 pm
by domino harvey
Jesus Christ
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 4:02 pm
by mfunk9786
Also, they took a fan vote to decide whether Ned Flanders and Mrs. Krabappel will be dating. Soooooo stupid.
Anyway, just look at
this blog for a while and you'll feel better.

Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 5:40 pm
by Brian C
mfunk9786 wrote:Entertainment Weekly's Fall TV Preview wrote:[The Simpsons returns with] a parody of The Diving Bell and the Butterfly in which a paralyzed Homer can only communicate through farting.
Oh, how far this show has fallen.
But it's so timely! I look forward to a 2015 episode where Lisa dates a radical young militant who wants to take up arms against his Shelbyvillian oppressors, while a wise and concerned Miss Hoover looks on and scowls.
Wait, that actually sounds good.
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 5:45 pm
by Gregor Samsa
Dead Homers is also helpful to ease the pain. Apparently at least one of the current season plots (The Simpsons are going to Antarctica!) was mocked in Season 13, when the show had already turned rather bad.
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 5:46 pm
by Gregor Samsa
Brian C wrote:mfunk9786 wrote:Entertainment Weekly's Fall TV Preview wrote:[The Simpsons returns with] a parody of The Diving Bell and the Butterfly in which a paralyzed Homer can only communicate through farting.
Oh, how far this show has fallen.
But it's so timely! I look forward to a 2015 episode where Lisa dates a radical young militant who wants to take up arms against his Shelbyvillian oppressors, while a wise and concerned Miss Hoover looks on and scowls.
Wait, that actually sounds good.
Lucky for them that any fines they incur, Ned Flanders can easily afford them.
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 6:42 pm
by flyonthewall2983
Dana Gould was on Kevin Pollak's show, and he talks about writing for
The Simpsons for about 20+ minutes.
Here it is.
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 9:11 pm
by swo17
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2011 6:23 pm
by mfunk9786
But why retire now, Krusty? Why not ten years ago?
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2011 7:18 pm
by Matt
Re: The Simpsons
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2011 4:12 am
by Brian C
This is basically what I was thinking as well. Fox seems to be taking a page straight from the Roger Goodell Management Handbook here, pretending to be losing money on a venture that absolutely no one can possibly believe they're really losing money on and then taking a maximalist negotiating position just for the sake of being assholes about it. I'm not sure why the cast is even bothering to make concessions in the first place.