Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 1:38 am


LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Director Oliver Stone, who has made movies about Presidents John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon, is developing a project about the current occupant of the White House, but promises it will not be a hatchet job, Daily Variety reported on Sunday.
Stone is in talks with Josh Brolin, who is starring in "No Country For Old Men," to play the title role in "Bush," the trade paper said.
He is shopping the script to financiers and hopes to start production by April, with a release date in time for the election in November, or the inauguration of Bush's successor in January.
Stone told Daily Variety that he planned to make "a fair, true portrait" of Bush, focusing on such areas as his relationship with his father, President George H.W. Bush, his wild youth, and his conversion to Christianity.
"It will contain surprises for Bush supporters and his detractors," said Stone.
He said Brolin was better looking than Bush, "but has the same drive and charisma that Americans identify with Bush, who has some of that old-time movie-star swagger."
A White House spokesman could not immediately be reached for comment. Bush has acknowledged that he was a heavy drinker in his younger days, but has long been sober.
Stone, who has had his battles with drink and drugs, earned three Oscar nominations for his 1991 conspiracy film "JFK." In 1996, he also received a script nomination for "Nixon," which starred Anthony Hopkins. He won best directing Oscars for the Vietnam sagas "Platoon" and "Born on the Fourth of July."
Other historical figures reinterpreted by Stone include dead rock star Jim Morrison in "The Doors," and Alexander the Great in "Alexander."
In 2002, he shot a flattering documentary about Cuban leader Fidel Castro for HBO, but the pay-cable network told him to balance it with more footage about political prisoners on the communist island.
Stone's efforts last year to film a documentary about another Bush nemesis, Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, also hit turbulence. His request for access was denied with an official reportedly dismissing the filmmaker as "part of the Great Satan."
...Part 22.domino harvey wrote:Oliver Stone's The Movie No One Asked For
You have to suffer with the rest of us.David Ehrenstein wrote:Shoot me now.
Yummy is the right word. Van Sant knows how to pick guys.David Ehrenstein wrote:Yummy Diego Luna has joined the cast of Milk.
There is a thread for Milk here.David Ehrenstein wrote:Yummy Diego Luna has joinjed the cast of Milk.
Here is a more in-depth look at the film with more quotes from Stone...flyonthewall2983 wrote:Oliver Stone to make 'fair' George Bush biopic
Oliver Stone votes for 'Bush' project
Josh Brolin to play embattled president
By MICHAEL FLEMING
Oliver Stone has set his sights on his next directing project, "Bush," a film focusing on the life and presidency of George W. Bush, and attached Josh Brolin to play the title role.
The director has begun quietly shopping a script by his "Wall Street" co-writer Stanley Weiser.
Pic will be produced by Moritz Borman, who teamed with Stone on "World Trade Center" and "Alexander," and Jon Kilik, a producer of "Alexander" as well as "Pinkville," the pre-strike project about the Army's investigation of the My Lai massacre in Vietnam that Stone expected to direct until United Artists pulled the plug late last year.
Borman said Weiser's script was completed before the WGA strike and was ready to shoot and that many of Stone's "Pinkville" crew jumped right into "Bush." If financing materializes quickly enough, the film could start production by April and could be in theaters for the election or the inauguration.
One need only Google the words "Stone" and "Bush" to find plenty of the director's critical comments about the Bush administration's invasion of Iraq. Despite that, the director said he's not looking to make an anti-Bush polemic. His goal is to use seminal events in Bush's life to explain how he came to power, using a structure comparable to "The Queen."
"It's a behind-the-scenes approach, similar to 'Nixon,' to give a sense of what it's like to be in his skin," Stone told Daily Variety. "But if 'Nixon' was a symphony, this is more like a chamber piece, and not as dark in tone. People have turned my political ideas into a cliche, but that is superficial. I'm a dramatist who is interested in people, and I have empathy for Bush as a human being, much the same as I did for Castro, Nixon, Jim Morrison, Jim Garrison and Alexander the Great."
More than one option
* (Co) Daily Variety
Filmography, Year, Role
* (Co) Daily Variety
Stone declined to give his personal opinion of the president.
"I can't give you that, because the filmmaker has to hide in the work," Stone said. "Here, I'm the referee, and I want a fair, true portrait of the man. How did Bush go from an alcoholic bum to the most powerful figure in the world? It's like Frank Capra territory on one hand, but I'll also cover the demons in his private life, his bouts with his dad and his conversion to Christianity, which explains a lot of where he is coming from. It includes his belief that God personally chose him to be president of the United States, and his coming into his own with the stunning, preemptive attack on Iraq. It will contain surprises for Bush supporters and his detractors."
Stone said his NYU classmate Weiser did a lot of research as they worked for more than a year on the project before setting the script aside when Stone committed to "Pinkville." While UA partners Paula Wagner and Tom Cruise said they pulled the plug on that movie because of the WGA strike, Stone seemed to support widespread speculation that the strike was an excuse to kill another war-themed movie that UA was wary of making after its first release, "Lions for Lambs," flopped.
"On 'Pinkville,' I had a great script and one of the best casts on any of my films, with 40 young actors and Bruce Willis," Stone said. "It's a shame they lost faith in the film, and that they unemployed 500 people right before Christmas. We were three weeks from shooting."
Stone hopes to get his script back so he can revive "Pinkville" down the line.
Stone, Weiser and Borman had kept the "Bush" script under tight wraps, developing it under "POTUS" (President of the United States) and "Misunderestimated." Now they're aiming for a quick ramp-up to production, though both Stone and Borman believe the project will remain viable even after the presidential election.
"We've just gone out with it, and April is just around the corner," Borman said. "If we can get it done as an independent or with a studio, we can do it quickly, but nobody really knows what is happening with the SAG situation. We've found locations in Louisiana, but we will have to build sets, especially the White House. We could do it later, because it's not a film that has to be timed with the election; it's a character study of a man."
Stone looked carefully at actors before setting his sights on Brolin, whose career has drawn recent traction from memorable roles in "No Country for Old Men" and "American Gangster." Brolin just began work on the Gus Van Sant-directed "Milk," playing Dan White, the San Francisco pol who gunned down Harvey Milk and Mayor George Moscone. While Brolin won't make a formal deal until financing is sealed, he can be ready for an April start.
"Josh is actually better looking than Bush but has the same drive and charisma that Americans identify with Bush, who has some of that old-time movie-star swagger," Stone said.
Considering the original was one of the most annoyingly conservative horror films I've seen in recent years they can remake it into oblivion! No wonder Cruise latched onto it as it puts forward the idea that sometimes it is better just to live in ignorance of the forces swirling around you!HerrSchreck wrote:Not exactly in production, but I can't help mentioning the forthcoming American remake of the brilliant Pang Bros Hong Kong horror-suspense near-masterpiece from 2002 called THE EYE. I don't have the energy to start a thread.
With Jessica Alba in a Tom Cruise-steered production, this will no doubt be brain starch.
, so I think that reading the film as "sometimes it's better, when you're seeing things that disturb you, to take a fork and knife and start mashing them into your eye sockets and break the yolk over easy" is a little strained. SEMI SPOILER ALERT EXCEPT FOR KINSAYDER: I mean the girl was born blind, never learned to see inna first place, and starts out seeing demons & phantoms as soon as she gets to see. So her "seeing" thing is not something the viewer should really strain to draw analogies with. It's like a baby coming outa the womb and getting called a fuckin wiseguy for crying and getting it's ass kicked around the room from that day forward. it'Cut the girl some slack for being a bit more relaxed and maybe lving a bit more "comfortable" when the horror is gone. Extracting "sometimes it's better to ignore the war in Iraq and a troubled society than confront it" from that, I really think, is a bit hyperactive in the mind dept. Some films are just silly entertainment-- like a rollercoaster ("having to get off the rollercoaster is a sign of something terrible in folks... a desire to escape the challenges of life, rather than stay on and meet the challenge".) It's just mindless entertainment, a little vacation from life with some good suspense and silly shocks, rather than an active comment upon it.that tanker explosion which winds up taking the girls newfound eyesight in the end
It is very interesting to compare Funny Games to Ils, but with Ils you are meant to believe this is a true story rather than being constantly reminded that everything is contrived but the pain in the Haneke film. Strangely the winking, all knowing lads from Funny Games come across as a lot more human than the mostly faceless puppets called upon to do the stalking, drugging and bludgeoning the script requires be done to the characters from Ils! (Or rather Funny Games is more honest in laying out its intentions than the pure entertainment of Ils) I'd bet anyone who likes one film would hate the other and vice versa!HerrSchreck wrote:Sounds like Funny Games
Give me the Ring any day!HerrSchreck wrote:Personally I think you're reading an awful lot into the "text", which isn't really much of anything... mostly an excuse for a series of set-pieces.
Surprised to see that the Birds remake still on agenda after 2 years of development."Nightmare" to haunt big screen again
Freddy's back. Again.
New Line is in talks with horror production company Platinum Dunes to re-launch the "Nightmare on Elm Street" movie series, the franchise that helped establish the studio.
The first "Nightmare" movie was made by Wes Craven and released in 1984. The runaway success of the film spawned a slew of sequels and created one of the most popular villains in screen history, Freddy Krueger, played by Robert Englund.
The film centered on Krueger, a serial child killer murdered by angry parents, who returns with a burned face and a razor glove to terrorize teens in their dreams.
A screenwriter will be hired once the Writers Guild of America strike ends. The producers -- Michael Bay, Brad Fuller and Andrew Form -- are hoping to focus part of the new movie on Krueger's backstory.
Platinum Dunes is prepping another re-launch, "Friday the 13th," which will be directed by Marcus Nispel for New Line, for whom it remade "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre" and its sequel.
The company is remaking "Near Dark" for Rogue and "The Birds" for Universal. It is also prepping a non-remake project, an untitled David Goyer thriller.
My God, I hope this fucking happens.Arrested Development Movie in Development!
Source: E! Online
Kristen at E! Online was told by Jason Bateman that "the creative minds behind 'Arrested Development' (Mitch Hurwitz and Ron Howard) have put the wheels in motion toward a major motion picture of the Fox TV comedy so many of us adore. I'm told by insiders that Jason and other Bluth family members have received calls from producers (Hurwitz and Howard) asking if they would be willing to shoot a movie."
"I can confirm that a round of sniffing has started," Bateman said. "Any talk is targeting a poststrike situation, of course. I think, as always, that it's a question of whether the people with the money are willing to give our leader, Mitch Hurwitz, what he deserves for his participation. And I can speak for the cast when I say our fingers are crossed."
She adds that other cast members were called and that everyone seems to be very much on board and excited by the prospect.
Joe Johnston is the new director for this film.Antoine Doinel wrote:Mark Romanek has left Wolfman.
Who wants to bet "reinvent" means imitate every hip indie comedy out there. What? No takers? Smart crowd.
I dunno, "Got any bones that need collecting?" is pretty cerebralCold Bishop wrote:Who wants to bet "reinvent" means imitate every hip indie comedy out there. What? No takers? Smart crowd.
And speaking of smarts, I don't think fans of Juno would even refer to it as an "intellectual comedy".