Page 19 of 147
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 1:51 am
by zedz
Matango wrote:I see they took my "An" uppercasing suggestion on board. I'm sure they're enjoying following this thread =D>
I bet that designer's therapist is pretty thrilled with us as well.
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:16 pm
by davebert
As long as they don't see the "fantasize what Tamara looks like" part of the On Five thread, I think we're safe.
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:37 pm
by Matt
davebert wrote:As long as they don't see the "fantasize what Tamara looks like" part of the On Five thread, I think we're safe.
No need to fantasize.
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:53 pm
by Antoine Doinel
Good job, Matt. Now Tamara is going to be Facebook hounded by Criterion pervs.

Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:54 pm
by tavernier
Matt wrote:davebert wrote:As long as they don't see the "fantasize what Tamara looks like" part of the On Five thread, I think we're safe.
No need to fantasize.
Tattoo Girl...nice!
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 5:48 pm
by justeleblanc
She's also sporting the hat on the Criterion store site, if that image is still there.
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 6:28 pm
by davebert
Oh lord, here we go....

Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 8:58 pm
by Jean-Luc Garbo
davebert wrote:Oh lord, here we go....

I'd say.

More importantly, Susan Arosteguy, Johanna Schiller, and Peter Becker are also on Facebook. I'd say thanking them personally for their contributions would be appropriate. Tamara just answers phones and wears hats.
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 9:21 pm
by Cinephrenic
Naa... that's just Mulvaney with glasses.
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 12:19 pm
by Gigi M.
tavernier wrote:Matt wrote:davebert wrote:As long as they don't see the "fantasize what Tamara looks like" part of the On Five thread, I think we're safe.
No need to fantasize.
Tattoo Girl...nice!
Looks hot, too.
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 3:48 pm
by Hopscotch
Are we in the creepy zone yet?
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 5:39 pm
by Matt
Hopscotch wrote:Are we in the creepy zone yet?
We passed that border miles ago.
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 5:45 pm
by Napier
Matt wrote:Hopscotch wrote:Are we in the creepy zone yet?
We passed that border miles ago.
And we are full steam ahead. I wonder how many people are busy at work signing up on facebook right now, just to ogle Tamara's profile.
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 9:11 pm
by Matt
Napier wrote:I wonder how many people are busy at work signing up on facebook right now, just to ogle Tamara's profile.
At least she was wise enough to limit viewing of her full profile to friends only.
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 2:22 pm
by mfunk9786
So, can we expect an announcement this week? Hopefully this is going to be a big week with a surprise release or two, and not just a bunch of Blu-Rays plus Bottle Rocket and Chungking Express standard releases.
I'm still holding out a glimmer of hope that the rumored Darjeeling Limited release will be coming this month, despite the fact that it's a Fox film. There has to be some reason why Wes Anderson didn't record a commentary for the original release, and why it had no extras to speak of. And I don't even like that film very much, it would just be nice to see.
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 2:39 pm
by sidehacker
Yeah, I hope Criterion releases a film with an already legitimate edition.
But seriously, that would be terrible. Half of the forum would be making long posts with lots of exclamation points.
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 3:05 pm
by Antoine Doinel
Yeah, God forbid people get excited. That would be horrible.
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 3:12 pm
by mfunk9786
Wes Anderson's films are good business for Criterion. I like Criterion. Wes Anderson films on Criterion therefore = good.
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 3:34 pm
by sidehacker
Antoine Doinel wrote:Yeah, God forbid people get excited. That would be horrible.
I meant that they would be angry. I like Wes Anderson too, but I don't see any reason why Criterion should bother with his latest film. I tend to prefer to see more movies released with
no edition whatsoever than see one re-released because it didn't have a commentary or something.
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 4:05 pm
by justeleblanc
mfunk9786 wrote:Wes Anderson's films are good business for Criterion. I like Criterion. Wes Anderson films on Criterion therefore = good.
All men are Socrates... therefore all men are homosexuals.
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 6:02 pm
by domino harvey
Wasn't there an interview where Anderson said Fox had rights to the film for a year and then he was going to sell them to Criterion? It's possible it was one of the internet's lies, but doesn't sound completely ridiculous either.
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 6:05 pm
by kaujot
A member also met Jason Schwartzman at the Arbor Hills Cinema here in Austin and was reportedly told that Criterion was working on extras for it.
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 6:26 pm
by mfunk9786
Would that be a year from theatrical release, or a year from DVD release? While DVD release would make more sense as far as that type of rights issue goes, it would certainly also make a lot of sense to release Bottle Rocket and Darjeeling on the same day... and if that day falls near the end of October, it would align with the time frame in which the film came out in theaters last year.
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 8:11 pm
by domino harvey
Oh my God, another revision. This has to be a record.
[img]http://criterion_production.s3.amazonaws.com/release_images/1771/446_auumnafternon.jpg[/img]
Posted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 8:23 pm
by Antoine Doinel
Ugh, is there an intern designing this thing? Instead of revising, they need to start this over from scratch.