Re: 147 In the Mood for Love
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2022 4:03 pm
I won't, but this is a slot that could've gone to something else. I personally think HDR-less UHDs are such a low priority, unless its something where the original BD was really messed up (Kino's Dollars Trilogy and The Great Escape are good examples of SDR UHDs - all four films had bad BDs). I do love this movie, watch it all the time, but the new color scheme is still completely unacceptable and Criterion is now further pushing it by releasing thisRibs wrote: Wed Aug 17, 2022 4:06 pm People like the movie actually and are happy to buy it in a new format that will render it better. I don’t really see the point in being angry about it, this current format is what the movie is now. Don’t buy it?
It has never gone OOPAmazing Goose wrote: Wed Aug 17, 2022 4:31 pm I don't see the original (and presumably now OOP) ITMFL doing the same thing
original ITMFL is still for sale, if you click that option on their website it even shows the old cover, and both of Tony Rayns' interviews are still there!Amazing Goose wrote: Wed Aug 17, 2022 4:31 pm Strange how Chungking Express continued to sell for over $100 after the WKW box was announced and released because it had the original color timing (though those prices seem to have cooled), yet I don't see the original (and presumably now OOP) ITMFL doing the same thing.
I suppose because both versions have been available for a while, so people can choose which one they want. (And, going by the Reddit thread, most don't mind the new look.)
What I meant is that the original version/release with the red tint is likely no longer available from Criterion now that this new WKW-restoration version has the spine number.swo17 wrote: Wed Aug 17, 2022 4:36 pmIt has never gone OOPAmazing Goose wrote: Wed Aug 17, 2022 4:31 pm I don't see the original (and presumably now OOP) ITMFL doing the same thing
it's still in print as of now, as I said above, you can literally select the Bluray option on the page for the film and it shows the old cover and old extras and allows you to purchase it. that edition, nor the original DVD, have ever gone out of print. even the old DVD just got a repackage but is still the same discsAmazing Goose wrote: Wed Aug 17, 2022 5:01 pmWhat I meant is that the original version/release with the red tint is likely no longer available from Criterion now that this new WKW-restoration version has the spine number.swo17 wrote: Wed Aug 17, 2022 4:36 pmIt has never gone OOPAmazing Goose wrote: Wed Aug 17, 2022 4:31 pm I don't see the original (and presumably now OOP) ITMFL doing the same thing
When the WKW box was announced, I picked up a couple extra copies of ITMFL at a sale price, thinking they might increase in value a la Chungking Express. When they stayed in print for a few years, I decided to sell them this summer.
I've learned not to speculate on Criterion discs.
i could've lived with SDR only if it had the original colors. this is a film where there would be a larger benefit (NOTLD not being one, in my opinion) since the original BD was a 2012 release. but since it's not...Finch wrote: Wed Aug 17, 2022 5:13 pm Another one here who loves the film dearly but won't be buying this UHD due to the revisionist colors. I don't mind this being SDR only but the new colors is still a deal breaker.
Caps-a-holic has a SDR comparison. The upgrade seems marginal in terms of precision and I haven't heard much praise about the HDR pass (IIRC, it's minimal and there is more to say about the new color grade as a whole than the HDR pass).Calvin wrote: Wed Aug 17, 2022 4:34 pm Has anybody seen the German UHD to compare it to the existing Criterion? I know that Nova initially announced this for UHD before making a U-turn as they thought the upgrade was too minimal to justify the expense and they're not exactly a label known for being PQ perfectionists.
i agree with you (especially if they lock up the UK rights - see Pale Flower getting released with a 10+ year old transfer even though there's a new 4K restoration), but they absolutely released this now because they knew they could cash in on one of the year's most popular movies referencing this one heavily.Dansu Dansu Dansu wrote: Wed Aug 17, 2022 5:23 pm I find it more depressing when Criterion releases a subpar edition of a film you love than when they put it in forever limbo (such as all Golden Age Japanese films, apparently) because, that’s it! That’s the one you’re getting. No hope for anything better. So personally, I consider “don’t buy it” to be an inadequate response.
Criterion could have waited until a solution to WKW’s revisionism materialized (such as using the widespread criticism to express reluctance about producing additional releases, putting pressure on WKW to allow both versions), or maybe, with a thousand possible upgrades awaiting release, waited more than a year from the box set’s original launch before releasing it. Considering they knew they were going 4K by the time they released it, the Blu-ray set now appears like a cynical calculation.
the movie uses the revisionist color in it's reference scene, and a lot of those fans seem to have by and large accepted that as the "correct" color scheme. at least from what I've seen on social media!therewillbeblus wrote: Wed Aug 17, 2022 6:23 pm What's the relationship between people who like Everything Everywhere All at Once and those who accept WKW's revisionism on In the Mood for Love? I get that there's a reference to this film in that film, but what else am I missing?
To add my two cents, Everything Everywhere's homage sequence doesn't really contain any of the revisionism that is contained in the recent "restoration" of ItMfL; the only resemblance to it I found was during the back alley scenes, and that looked (at least to me) motivated by the neon lights in the scene than any reference to WkW's revisionism. I could be wrong (I've only seen the film once), but that's what I can recall. That doesn't change my perception that Criterion is releasing this specifically to cash in on that film's success thoughtherewillbeblus wrote: Wed Aug 17, 2022 6:34 pm Is it really a consistent conversation being talked about on social media, where people who like the Daniels film are advocating hard for this revisionism to the point of it becoming a 'thing'? That would be so weird, but it's the only thing that really constitutes calling the revisionists "the Everything Everywhere crowd" -almost everyone I know who likes that film and is in the know about the WKW restoration controversy did not make that connection and is against the revisionism. So it feels a bit misguided or harsh to categorize those who are in favor of/complicit in ruining this movie synonymous with the fans of a recent fun popular movie with about two minutes of footage set in that color palette/reference! I don't want to get lumped in there!
It's an hommage/spoof, not a restoration, and it's to WKW's style overall, not ITMFL specifically (though obviously, its themes are the closest). It'd be also very tough, as shown by the timeline, to explain how people were convinced in 2021 by a movie released in 2022.Computer Raheem wrote: Wed Aug 17, 2022 7:04 pmthe only resemblance to it I found was during the back alley scenes, and that looked (at least to me) motivated by the neon lights in the scene than any reference to WkW's revisionism.
Apologies for not specifying; I was going against the notion that people who were defending the restoration of ItMfL were doing so because it resembled Everything Everywhere's homage by saying that the sequence in Everything Everywhere did not resemble the restoration of ItMfL in my opinion. I hope that clarifies things.tenia wrote: Wed Aug 17, 2022 7:08 pm This is non-sense.
Everything Everywhere was first shown on March 11, 2022.
The ITMFL's 4k restoration was already touring in October 2017.
The WKW Criterion was released in March 2021, and the discussion (including from those who praised it) started there.
It's an hommage/spoof, not a restoration, and it's to WKW's style overall, not ITMFL specifically (though obviously, its themes are the closest). It'd be also very tough, as shown by the timeline, to explain how people were convinced in 2021 by a movie released in 2022.Computer Raheem wrote: Wed Aug 17, 2022 7:04 pmthe only resemblance to it I found was during the back alley scenes, and that looked (at least to me) motivated by the neon lights in the scene than any reference to WkW's revisionism.