Warner Random Speculation
-
Cinesimilitude
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 4:43 am
- devlinnn
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 7:23 am
- Location: three miles from space
Indeed. At least Warner are releasing new classic titles before the curtains are drawn, but the majority of studio resources in the near and distant future will be concentrated on the re-releasing and re-packaging of the same old for BluRay.davidhare wrote:Don't people think this is one of those last big gasps of classic material before the dead zone of BluRay?
"..if that's all there is, then let's keep dancing"
- ben d banana
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:53 am
- Location: Oh Where, Oh Where?
It does say many will be released day and date w/ HD-DVD versions, and if you read the whole article on the Digital Bits it says they'll also be releasing them on Blu-ray once the format is launced. Other notable absences from what's been quoted is that when it's referring to the SE's that means double discs (so hopefully there will be nice versions of Lolita, Barry Lyndon, and Full Metal Jacket as well), the HD-DVD list price for catalog titles will by $29.98, and that the HD formats will have additional extras not available on DVD (and no, there will be nothing exclusive to the DVDs). To my mind, rather than a last gasp, it's a decisive move to get film buffs, and not just techies, to jump into the early adopter sweepstakes. Obviously, that would be a lot easier without a format war.
- Lino
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:18 am
- Location: Sitting End
- Contact:
- The Fanciful Norwegian
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:24 pm
- Location: Teegeeack
No on both counts. That would require you to make a 650 nanometer red laser read data designed for a 405 nanometer violet/blue laser, which would probably earn you a Nobel Prize. DVD/Blu-ray and DVD/HD DVD hybrid discs are possible but I doubt they'll be widely used (probably a good thing in light of the experience with DualDisc).
- justeleblanc
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:05 pm
- Location: Connecticut
Do they own the rights to Mahler?Annie Mall wrote:Yeah, I noticed that too. It's strange that they don't even mention The Devils that was touched upon on last year's chat. I don't know - right now, I'm guessing a Fall release for those Russell titles. Hopefully.justeleblanc wrote:When will they release Ken Russell already!! ](*,)
- Lino
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:18 am
- Location: Sitting End
- Contact:
Ashirg, no June Warner title has been announced yet so there's still chance of that to happen.
As for Mahler, justeleblanc: I do hope that they too own it since it's now OOP and the recently released UK version is a mess. There is a strong possibility that they do as Mahler is a Goodtimes title much like Warner's owned Lisztomania. One hopes, at least.
As for Mahler, justeleblanc: I do hope that they too own it since it's now OOP and the recently released UK version is a mess. There is a strong possibility that they do as Mahler is a Goodtimes title much like Warner's owned Lisztomania. One hopes, at least.
-
stroszeck
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 2:42 am
Since we will apparently be getting "Reflections in a GOlden Eye," does anybody know if we could look forward to Huston's "The Dead?" it was, after all his last film, I'm just not sure whether Warner owns the rights.
Great movie, not available on DVD. See Roger Ebert's review -- he added teh film recently to his great movies site.
Great movie, not available on DVD. See Roger Ebert's review -- he added teh film recently to his great movies site.
- tryavna
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 8:38 pm
- Location: North Carolina
And don't forget Huston's other late-career literary adaptation, the masterful Under the Volcano. That's a film that sorely needs wider appreciation.stroszeck wrote:Since we will apparently be getting "Reflections in a GOlden Eye," does anybody know if we could look forward to Huston's "The Dead?" it was, after all his last film, I'm just not sure whether Warner owns the rights.
Great movie, not available on DVD. See Roger Ebert's review -- he added teh film recently to his great movies site.
-
Greathinker
- justeleblanc
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:05 pm
- Location: Connecticut
I thought a SE was already announced. I swear a read it somewhere that <b>Rio Bravo</b> was getting a new release. Wasn't it on this forum?Achris wrote:Anyone think there's a chance of a Rio Bravo SE anytime in the future? I was disappointed to see its a barebones release when there's so much that could be done.
- Godot
- Cri me a Tearion
- Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 4:13 am
- Location: Phoenix
- Derek Estes
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:00 am
- Location: Portland Oregon
- Faux Hulot
- Jack Of All Tirades
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 3:57 pm
- Location: Location, Location
- Lino
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:18 am
- Location: Sitting End
- Contact:
- Derek Estes
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:00 am
- Location: Portland Oregon
- Lino
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:18 am
- Location: Sitting End
- Contact:
- manicsounds
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 2:58 am
- Location: Tokyo, Japan
- Schkura
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 5:48 pm
- Location: Mississippi
Maybe Warner figures China and Russia already have copies."The spread of theft of America's creative works flows like a swiftly running river in every nook and cranny of this planet," Jack Valenti, president of the Motion Picture Association of America, told the panel.
Valenti cited China and Russia, "where the problems are large and growing at an alarming rate" and where "organized criminal groups play a large role in the replication and distribution of pirated DVDs."
In both countries, "the piracy problems are spilling out beyond their borders to infect markets all around the world," Valenti told the panel.
( http://www.boycott-riaa.com/article/12465 )
- Jeff
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:49 am
- Location: Denver, CO
It looks to me like the Lucy & Desi box will be the first ones in slim cases.Annie Mall wrote:This is interesting - from Video Business:
On a more serious note, (Jeff Baker) explained that Warner is coming to retailers' aid by encasing boxed set discs in thinner Amaray cases beginning this May.
- bjeggert82
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 1:36 am
- Location: www.deepfocusreview.com
- Contact:
This is really annoying and frustrating. First Universal releases Gary Cooper/W.C. Fields (and the like) boxed sets sans individual cases--which I expect from Universal, since they're cheap-skates. Now Warner is going to the cheap route.
I really hope that future sets (John Wayne/Ford, John Ford, etc) have the normal keep cases that we're all used to. Perhaps this Lucy and Desi set is Warner's one cheap exception...
I really hope that future sets (John Wayne/Ford, John Ford, etc) have the normal keep cases that we're all used to. Perhaps this Lucy and Desi set is Warner's one cheap exception...
- ben d banana
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:53 am
- Location: Oh Where, Oh Where?
- dx23
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:52 am
- Location: Puerto Rico
Although they are cheaper, I doubt that was the only or major reason for Warner doing it. Space issues for both retailers and consumers has to be the main factor. Retailers like Wal-Mart and Best Buy have both been vocal about spacing issues in their store, specially with box sets, so Warner, being one of the leaders in the DVD industry, is helping to fix that issue. Consumers like myself, aren't going to cry about it since after 500 DVDs, you begin to have space issues for your collection.bjeggert82 wrote:This is really annoying and frustrating. First Universal releases Gary Cooper/W.C. Fields (and the like) boxed sets sans individual cases--which I expect from Universal, since they're cheap-skates. Now Warner is going to the cheap route.
I really hope that future sets (John Wayne/Ford, John Ford, etc) have the normal keep cases that we're all used to. Perhaps this Lucy and Desi set is Warner's one cheap exception...