Page 22 of 39

Re: Criterion and Paramount

Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 11:24 pm
by MyNameCriterionForum
Agreed, One-Eyed Jacks is fantastic. It would be especially nice to have some extras on that one, particularly regarding Kubrick's involvement and the "ringing of the gong" haha. Shame most involved are gone, though.

Re: Criterion and Paramount

Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 11:53 pm
by jaredsap
ianungstad wrote:The recently released Night Train to Munich is a public domain title.
Not in the US. Owned by Fox. I've confirmed this and Criterion's DVD packaging credits them.

Re: Criterion and Paramount

Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 4:09 pm
by Bruce
Do Criterion have the rights to release on Blu-ray any of the Paramount-licensed titles that they have already released on DVD? They have already released 'Days Of Heaven' in both formats for example.

If so, I'm wondering what the chances are of seeing Criterion BDs for titles such as 'Ace In The Hole' and 'If....'.

Re: Criterion and Paramount

Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 4:15 pm
by cdnchris
I think it was figured they don't have the BD rights to the Paramount titles, and actually had to fight to get the Blu-ray rights for Days of Heaven. Since they did get Days of Heaven I guess anything is possible, but there's certainly no guarantee.

Re: Criterion and Paramount

Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 4:21 pm
by Bruce
OK, thanks for your prompt reply. :)

Re: Criterion Facebook and Twitter

Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 3:21 pm
by GiovanniR
Criterion in reply of a request for The Conformist:
Keep your fingers crossed.

Re: Criterion Facebook and Twitter

Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 4:21 pm
by Peacock
Bearing in mind a couple of comments earlier than Criterion's mentioned hoping for Luna, Before the Revolution (which we know they have) and The Spider's Stratagem as well.

Re: Criterion Facebook and Twitter

Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 4:44 pm
by SpiderBaby
^Hey Peacock, I asked not too long ago about Before The Revolution and they said they don't have the rights anymore. I don't know if that is a smoke screen, but they could of just left my question unanswered if it was.

Re: 'Forthcoming' Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vo

Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 4:46 pm
by zenosparadox
About The Conformist, Criterion, on FB, just said, "Keep your fingers crossed." Exciting!

Just go to their page and look for the post by "Daniel McClelland" about The Conformist.

Re: 'Forthcoming' Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vo

Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 6:42 pm
by Cinephrenic
That would include 1900 too I hope. Bertolucci's Marxist miniseries in HD.

Re: 'Forthcoming' Lists Discussion and Random Speculation Vo

Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 8:17 pm
by captveg
zenosparadox wrote:About The Conformist, Criterion, on FB, just said, "Keep your fingers crossed." Exciting!

Just go to their page and look for the post by "Daniel McClelland" about The Conformist.
You know, I was thinking Paramount might have just licensed more titles to Criterion since the Legend and Olive films via Paramount licensing for Blu-ray were just announced. This is exciting news. Hopefully they also secured Blu-ray rights for some of their Paramount DVD only releases, too.

Re: Criterion Facebook and Twitter

Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 9:44 pm
by HistoryProf
GiovanniR wrote:Criterion in reply of a request for The Conformist:
Keep your fingers crossed.
ooooo...goody goody! \:D/

Re: Criterion and Paramount

Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 11:57 pm
by Jeff
I wondered if Criterion might be going after The Conformist (and 1900, and others). Paramount took tons of titles out of print last year, and has basically stopped dealing with all but the biggest sellers in their catalog (Centennial Collection), choosing to farm out the deeper catalog titles to third parties. The Conformist DVD has a good transfer and a featurette, but it's certainly worth a Criterion release just to get it in Blu. It's one of my favorite films, and certainly one of the most beautiful. Hopefully, since it's 1.66, Storaro will keep his mitts off of it.

Criterion mentioned in the past that they're big fans of Seconds and would like to release it, but didn't have the rights at that time. Maybe this time they'll also go after Seconds, One-Eyed Jacks, The Mattei Affair, and Don't Look Now, all of which seem like prime Criterion candidates*.

* Along with Nashville, The Parallax View, The Tin Star, Miracle of Morgan's Creek, Wings, Serpico, Atlantic City, Pretty Baby, Rosemary's Baby, The Dead Zone, The Elephant Man, Paper Moon, Targets, The Tenant, Little Big Man, Ragtime, and dozens of others.

If the Republic catalog is in play, that list would double.

Re: Criterion and Paramount

Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 12:06 am
by knives
Jeff wrote: Criterion mentioned in the past that they're big fans of Seconds and would like to release it, but didn't have the rights at that time. Maybe this time they'll also go after Seconds, One-Eyed Jacks, The Mattei Affair, and Don't Look Now, all of which seem like prime Criterion candidates.
If even just one of those came out (again) it would be worth the stress of Paramount pulling them in the first place. Talking about their big sellers though I'm surprised they haven't reissued the American Polanksi's yet.

Re: Criterion and Paramount

Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 1:21 pm
by rwaits
Isn't Medium Cool Paramount? Hasn't Criterion expressed some interest in that film in the past?

Re: Criterion and Paramount

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2011 3:51 am
by flyonthewall2983
Doubtful it's been mentioned yet, but I think 48 Hours would make for a good release. It might be my favorite 80's buddy-cop movie because the chemistry between Murphy and Nolte plays up the comedy, not the story (not unlike the first Lethal Weapon). Paramount has only released bare bones editions of it, up to the recent Blu-Ray release.

Re: Criterion and Paramount

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2011 4:31 am
by Cold Bishop
I'd rather they get The Warriors, and correct the "Director's Cut" blunder.

Re: Criterion and Paramount

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2011 11:07 am
by Forrest Taft
I would buy 48 hrs in a heartbeat, but if they are to release an early Walter Hill movie, I'd prefer Hard Times, The Driver or Southern Comfort. Or Hickey and Boggs, which I've heard great things about, but have never managed to track down... :(

Re: Criterion and Paramount

Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2011 11:38 am
by Cold Bishop
Paramount owns none of those. MGM owns a few, but unless Criterion can get a shot at an Optimum style boxset, I'd doubt they'd touch them.

And Hickey and Boggs is floating around in a very watchable TV Rip, sourced from the MGM-HD broadcast. A big favorite of mine. It was also available once on iTunes, might still be.

Re: Criterion and Paramount

Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 7:47 am
by Bruce
Bruce wrote:Do Criterion have the rights to release on Blu-ray any of the Paramount-licensed titles that they have already released on DVD? They have already released 'Days Of Heaven' in both formats for example.

If so, I'm wondering what the chances are of seeing Criterion BDs for titles such as 'Ace In The Hole' and 'If....'.
OK so we're now going to get 'If....'. What's the likelihood we will get 'Ace In The Hole' on Blu within the next 12 months?

Re: Criterion and Paramount

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2011 5:05 am
by HistoryProf
I would imagine that's somewhere in the realm of "definitely possible"

Re: Criterion and Paramount

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2011 7:48 pm
by flyonthewall2983
Would The Friends Of Eddie Coyle fall into that category as well?

Re: Criterion and Paramount

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 6:10 am
by Noiradelic
I think Ace in the Hole is a significantly better candidate for a Blu than Friends Of Eddie Coyle. Ace is a fully loaded 2 disc set with a canonical director, while FoEC is lower-tier and somewhat more obscure. That being said, we don't know what the licensing issues are. I bet against FoEC when I nabbed it last fall -- we'll see how that works out for me.

Re: Criterion and Paramount

Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 3:50 am
by captveg
Friends of Eddie Coyle is also one of the titles post spine #450, which has yet to see a DVD-only release get a Blu-ray upgrade. That barrier will be broken someday, but I wouldn't bet on FoEC to be the one to do it.

Re: Criterion and Paramount

Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2012 12:09 am
by ianungstad
Anyone want to speculate what's going to be included in this second batch of Paramount titles?

So far there is strong evidence that Harold and Maude, Rosemary's Baby, The Conformist, Miracle of Morgan's Creek are all forthcoming.

Other strong possibilities:

Margot at the Wedding (Noah Baumbach)
Virgin Suicides (Sophia Coppola)
Election (Alexander Payne)
Sydney/Hard Eight (Paul Thomas Anderson)
Bringing out the Dead (Martin Scorsese)
Witness (Peter Weir)
Gallipoli (Peter Weir)
American Gigolo (Paul Schrader)
Atlantic City (Louis Malle)
Pretty Baby (Louis Malle)
The Parallax View (Alan J. Paluka)
The Tenant (Roman Polanski)
Don't Look Now (Nicholas Roeg)
Paper Moon (Peter Bogdanovich)
Targets (Peter Bogdanovich)
Serpico (Sidney Lumet)
Nashville (Robert Altman)
Hud (Martin Ritt)
The Tin Star (Anthony Mann)
Seconds (John Frankenheimer)
Elephant Man (David Lynch)
Stalog 17 (Billy Wilder)
Play it Again, Sam (Herbert Ross)
Medium Cool (Haskell Wexler)
The Tin Star (Anthony Mann)

Unreleased titles that Criterion may want: The Keep, Handle with Care/Citizen's Band, Looking for Mr.Goodbar, One Eyed Jacks, The Man Who Knew too Much

I still think titles like Sunset Boulevard, The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance, etc are too big for Paramount to license out. (That goes for anything they released as a "Centennial" edition, really). Ditto, There Will be Blood. (which is too bad since the special edition had lousy extras)