Tombs of the Blind Dead (Amando de Ossorio, 1972)
You know, I've been letting this film roll around in my head for a while now, as there was something about it I just couldn't put my finger on. It was while watching the sequel (see below), that it finally hit me what's so familiar and effective about this film. What Amando de Ossorio has essentially done is re-imagine
L'Avventura as a full on horror film. No, really. Look at the plot: a couple and their third wheel go on an outing. After a spat, and a detour to a barren, abandoned locale, one of them goes missing. The two remaining members spend the rest of the film searching for her while being slowly drawn together. Yet, the similarities go beyond just the superficiality of plot (see
Psycho) the film's share a thematic resonance.
L'Avventura are about people who are controlled by compulsive sexuality, who thoughtlessly pursue that whim, but at the end, continuously find themselves physically unsatisfied, emotionally empty and facing spiritual despair. Think of the scene where Monica Vitti, wracked with guilt after sleeping with Gabriele Ferzetti, wanders the streets of a town only to find herself followed by one group of men, then another, until she's surrounded by dozens of leering men, persecuted by their glares. This is like that, except instead of unemployed dock workers, the group consists of 6-foot-tall charred out skeletons holding swords and thirsty for blood... you know, the existential crisis of the everyman. But if "eros is sick" in Antonioni's film, here eros leads to ritual murder.
The entire film is informed by the hysterical, unstable jolts of sexuality. The entire
modus operandi of our undead friends (actually Templar zombie-vampires) is tinged with sado-masochistic perversity: they live off the blood of virgins, they're fond of stabbing women's breasts (this is Euro-horror after all), and they get their fix by groping and sucking all over their victim's bodies. The entire calamity is initiated by a sordid love-triangle, and it seems to be the emanating vibrations of fierce passions and petty jealousy that arouse the monsters as much as the promise of tasty hemoglobin. A lot of this anticipates the sexual punishment of later horror films, namely slashers, but I'm not sure its quite as cut-and-dry and puritanical here. Yes, to some degree Lone Fleming fills out the role of the virginal final girl, but she also has more than a few sapphic tendencies (and note that the other girl gets punished, if anything, for violently repressing that lesbianism), and she's less virginal than she seems to be terrified of male sexuality. And the film gives her good reason: from necrophilic perversity to sexual assault to general overall caddishness, the film profiles an array of uncontrolled passions and violent desires that are pursued recklessly. It is the disturbances and trauma of these sexual eruptions that echo and instigate the more obvious disturbance and trauma of the living dead. In many ways, the film could be interpreted as a fable about a woman being dragged kicking and screaming into adult heterosexuality, and what she finds their isn't exactly assuring.
The film is highly effective and handsomely shot. It has some problems: the film drags at places, and at other times, the story seems to have been slapped together. The Bava-esque scene in the mannequin warehouse has no internal logic other than it looks cool (and it does!), and, as if realizing the ending won't work with only two characters, the film twists itself in pretzels to shoe-in a few new characters at the last minute. But what Ossorio excels at is atmosphere, and when the plot gets out of the way, it's here the film succeeds. The makeup on these zombies are some of the most impressive of the decade (if ever), and I'm sure the common, overused imagery of the undead rising out of foggy graveyards largely comes from here; other films (and comics) did it earlier, but this film did it most effectively, including some of the best use of slow-motion in a horror film since Epstein's
Fall of the House of Usher. It has just the right amount of sleaze to be pulpy but not degrading, and it's all capped with one hell of an ending. The final reel is damn near apocalyptic, as the eros-sickness threatens to overrun the microcosm of our central characters and infect the whole world. Who am I kidding? It already has.
A recommended Euro-horror classic
Return of the Evil Dead (Amando de Ossorio, 1973)
Now this I didn't care for at all. How so many American fans prefer this over the original bewilders me, although it probably helps explain the sorry state of Horror in this country (sorry, Siddon). The last film ended with the threat of the undead reaching the greater world, and with this, we have a whole film devoted to just that (to a degree; this is a small village, not a city). If these films bear some debt to Romero's Zombie film, the first film refreshingly went a completely different direction. Here, however, as if unable to help himself, Ossorio makes his
Night of the Living Dead, his group-under-siege film. That's fine and all, but the atmosphere that made his earlier film so successful is gone. For starters, the plot is really much closer to an action film: while Romero noticed this and played with it in
Dawn of the Dead, Ossorio doesn't seem to realize it, so he automatically assumes anything involving the living dead is automatically scary. It's not. The central conceit of selfish, crazed passion announcing the arrival of unworldly destruction is still here (note the carefully timed firework displays), but he expands his scope from sexual recklessness to just general human pettiness. Once again, this ties to the Romeroic concept that it is man, and not the zombies, who are the true monsters, but often, we can't tell whether these are stupid characters or just stupid writing. Ossorio doubles the amount of characters, and as a result, we really don't have time to care for any of them. In fact, unlike the earlier film, where the human drama and the horror echoed one another, this often just feels like soap-opera filler. But the worst part, and most damming for a under-siege film, is that Ossorio captures none of the urgency, the desperation, the feeling of society slowly crumbling, of hope being drained away, that is crucial to this sort of film. Hell, even Umberto Lenzi could capture some of that feeling!
Only the ending captures some of the magic of the earlier film, but that's purely cinematographic: narratively, its completely anticlimactic. All in all, I find little in this film to recommend. At least the next two film can't go anywhere but up (right?).