Page 23 of 49

Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 9:25 pm
by justeleblanc
Am I the only one who wanted to see Jean Seberg's bosom on the cover?

Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 9:37 pm
by jesus the mexican boi
I was hoping for some variant of this image...

Image

At least all the Mondo Macabro fans would've blind-bought it.

Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 10:34 pm
by Musashi219
If that is the cover for The Milky Way then I refuse to buy it.

Eclipse Series 5, however, looks fancy.

Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 10:50 pm
by miless
Musashi219 wrote:If that is the cover for The Milky Way then I refuse to buy it.

Eclipse Series 5, however, looks fancy.
well, I'll be buying it... for the film, not the cover art.

Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 10:52 pm
by Greathinker
Musashi219 wrote:If that is the cover for The Milky Way then I refuse to buy it.

Eclipse Series 5, however, looks fancy.
Oh come on, is this a film board or what? I go nuts when I see that excuse.

Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 11:12 pm
by rebelswede
it's going to be funny when they start running out of color combinations for eclipse releases.

on the subject, i'm not a fan of covers with the C being in a different color from the criterion collection bar.

Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 11:15 pm
by domino harvey
I'll still be buying The Milky Way, but I will no longer be planning to take my Christmas Card Photos holding the DVD box.

Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 12:17 am
by Cinephrenic
it's going to be funny when they start running out of color combinations for eclipse releases.
Then they will start changing tints of the colors making your shelf look as gay as possible.

Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 4:16 am
by Matt
Cinephrenic wrote:
it's going to be funny when they start running out of color combinations for eclipse releases.
Then they will start changing tints of the colors making your shelf look as gay as possible.
And by "gay," surely you mean:

Showing or characterized by cheerfulness and lighthearted excitement; merry. Bright or lively, especially in color: a gay, sunny room.

Because a homosexual shelf would just be preposterous.

Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 4:20 am
by domino harvey
Matt wrote:
Cinephrenic wrote:
it's going to be funny when they start running out of color combinations for eclipse releases.
Then they will start changing tints of the colors making your shelf look as gay as possible.
And by "gay," surely you mean:

Showing or characterized by cheerfulness and lighthearted excitement; merry. Bright or lively, especially in color: a gay, sunny room.

Because a homosexual shelf would just be preposterous.
post/av combo

Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 6:31 am
by Doctor Sunshine
Image
I like it.

Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 6:34 am
by justeleblanc
Actually, I'm beginning to like it as well.

Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 6:59 am
by mpippia
It's growing on me. I wouldn't mind seeing them smooth out some of the curves and straight lines though.

Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 7:17 am
by Highway 61
I'd like to think Criterion is pulling a prank, as if they made this cover specifically to laugh out our inevitable outrage, but that they eventually plan on changing it. Or maybe it's permanent, and it's just a big fuck you from Criterion after bitching over the Virdiana cover so much.

Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 1:43 pm
by arsonfilms
Generally when pdfs get sent out there needs to be SOME cover available to show off the title, but the cover doesn't have to be officially locked for another month or so. Since most retailers wait for an official cover and criteriondvd.com prefers to be on the bleeding edge, I'm guessing that criteriondvd just put up the temporary cover while the real one is being tweaked and adjusted. I wouldn't expect anything too different, but I'm sure it won't be identical.

Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 3:34 pm
by Dante Vescio
Oh come on, it can't be the real cover.
It's just awful.
I think it's fan cover because the official Criterion webpage still didn't put up the cover yet.

Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 3:40 pm
by thechallenger
Dante Vescio wrote:Oh come on, it can't be the real cover.
It's just awful.
I think it's fan cover because the official Criterion webpage still didn't put up the cover yet.
I think we're all hoping that it is some sort of placeholder for the actual cover. As you and someone else stated - adding to this is the fact that the Criterion website hasn't officially uploaded it as the cover yet.

The more I stare at it - the less I dislike it. I bet this is one of those covers that looks much better when you actually have it in your hands or stare at it from a distance. At least they didn't place a knocked-over glass of milk and have the milk trail off in different directions on a table that resemebles that of the last supper and use it as the cover (although now I think it'd be kind of groovy).

Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 3:42 pm
by ranaing83
I don't know. I still think it is pretty bad. It just doesn't have the "texture" or "feel" of a final cover. There is something that just feels amateur about it, it feels like a Photoshop job. I don't know if it is the color, or the quality of the image behind the arrows, but I don't think it is final, or at least I hope it isn't.

Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 3:44 pm
by arsonfilms
Dante Vescio wrote:Oh come on, it can't be the real cover.
It's just awful.
I think it's fan cover because the official Criterion webpage still didn't put up the cover yet.
"Fan cover" and "temporary cover used just so that distributors could look at something - ANYTHING" are not the same thing. The fact that Criterion hasn't put it up yet just means they're still working on it, but they have to have SOMETHING to show distributors when they make their announcements.

C'mon people, this isn't the first time we've seen a temporary cover. If..., Pandora's Box, Viridiana, Dazed and Confused, Six Moral Tales, etc. all changed before going to print.

Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 4:31 pm
by toiletduck!
Isn't this the exact situation we had with Naked and Masculin Feminin? Then again, one of those was very close to the final product and the other was completely different, so that t'ain't much help.

-Toilet Dcuk

Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 6:50 pm
by Satyajit's Son
Holy shit that is horrible. Will buy the film regardless but who the fuck greenlit this cover and what the fuck were they smoking when they did?

Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 8:16 pm
by Cinephrenic
If that is released with that cover, it has got to be worst in the collection. Even worse than the original Viridiana art.

Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 11:27 pm
by Doctor Sunshine
If you look at the base of the 3rd arrow down from the top right it's not smoothly joined to the rest, and there's only one other jag, so this isn't part of the look, it's evidence that this is just a rough layout. I was joking when I said I liked it but it is interesting conceptually. The flat tint is the worst part so once that alone is worked out it'll look 100% better. I agree that's it a temp.

Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 11:36 pm
by Cinephrenic
Criterion designers are having a hard time with surrealism. They should just slap a Dali painting on the cover.

Posted: Mon May 21, 2007 1:22 am
by patrick
I like both the Cria Cuervos and House of Games covers, although HoG does look a little generic, like it could be an ad for the Sopranos or a new SE of Rounders or something.