Page 23 of 41

Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 5:30 am
by Jem
dx23 wrote:Image
Is that Malcolm, in the middle?

Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 9:21 pm
by dx23
Image

Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 3:11 pm
by Lemmy Caution
Horror films are generally too easy of targets. But here's one I keep seeing around. Notice that Room 6 is actually Room 666. I get scared just typing that. [Btw, the synopsis on AMG made the film sound laughably bad]:

Image

Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 5:45 pm
by Nadsat
I hope the transfer is better than the cover…

Image

Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 6:56 pm
by Matt
Nadsat wrote:Image
If you remade that movie with Edward Norton, Josh Harnett, and Jamie Foxx, you wouldn't even need to change the cover art.

Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 7:10 pm
by Schkura
I was thinking Harry Shearer, Robert Ulrich, and O.J. Simpson, but your Dream Team might be easier to cast, Matt.

Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 1:56 pm
by dx23
Image

Image

Mira Sorvino's photoshoped head could fall at any minute.

Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 2:08 pm
by The Invunche
It's good to see two Oscar winners go straight to video.

Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 2:29 pm
by Antoine Doinel
When did Kevin Spacey get hair plugs?

Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 3:26 pm
by Napoleon
Kevin Cusack?

Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 4:02 pm
by chaddoli
They also added "Force" to the title, because things that have force sell better.

Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 6:37 pm
by Lemmy Caution
The Hades Factor cover looks very much like a cheap imitation of the Bourne Identity covers.

Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 10:16 am
by King of Kong
Image

Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 11:25 am
by skuhn8
Certainly not a great cover...but worst? C'mon, this is about finding design atrocities.

Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 4:41 pm
by Nadsat
Another great artwork from Network…

Image

Check also their homepage and you find more great examples in cover design :wink:

http://www.networkdvd.co.uk

Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 6:13 pm
by Lemmy Caution
skuhn8 wrote:Certainly not a great cover...but worst? C'mon, this is about finding design atrocities.
For such a great film, that cover qualifies as awful.
When Room 6 or Stay Alive have poorly constructed photoshop mush, it's almost to be expected. Actually it's a plus because it helps you to avoid accidentally buying/renting such a crap film. Sort of "truth in cover art."

But a film like Open City deserves a little more thought and love. It's the discrepancy between the quality of a film and its dvd cover that is important in evualating that elusive quality of worstness.

Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 4:30 am
by ChrisW
Rufus T. Firefly wrote:More weird-looking Buster DVDs - these being the upcoming R4s.

Image
Image
Image
Surprised to see these in here, what's the deal? We're just about to start designing the box for the boxset... any design comments would be greatly appreciated.

Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 4:32 am
by King of Kong
I actually like those Keaton covers - quite stylish.

Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 5:55 am
by daniel p
ChrisW wrote:
Rufus T. Firefly wrote:More weird-looking Buster DVDs - these being the upcoming R4s.

Image
Image
Image
Surprised to see these in here, what's the deal? We're just about to start designing the box for the boxset... any design comments would be greatly appreciated.
I like them... undeservedly in this thread imo...

Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:48 pm
by dx23
Image

Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 7:05 pm
by Matt
Isn't that exactly what you'd expect the Police Squad cover to look like?

And those Keaton covers are the best in existence outside perhaps the MoC disc, but they didn't have to come up with a design concept for multiple releases. It's also not their fault that they have to put the ratings sticker and four logos on the front.

Might I remind you again of the Kino atrocities?

Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 9:30 pm
by skuhn8
Kino covers are often quite bad. But if you made a worst DVD menus thread it would be dominated by Kino almost exclusively.

Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 5:47 am
by FilmFanSea
Hard to imagine a worse cover for this Renoir film:

Image

A solid nominee for Worst Cover of 2006.

Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 6:53 am
by John Cope
As a big fan of this particular picture I heartily second that, FilmFan; though I may still end up getting the DVD. :oops:

Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 7:30 am
by King of Kong
Saw this at the Beaver:

Image

Worf just doesn't look right to me...

EDIT: fixed