Page 225 of 318
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2022 1:40 am
by swo17
Well, he was, 30+ years ago
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2022 1:45 am
by DeprongMori
therewillbeblus wrote: Tue Oct 18, 2022 1:03 am
They aren't "regularly" releasing LvT, and the blackface in
Swing Time happened before the zeitgeist's effect banished stuff like
30 Rock and
Community episodes that were either directly addressing the issue or had nothing to do with blackface purely as risk management erasure. The only movie including blackface to be released by them since was a satire of it by Spike Lee. Context is important, as is the timeline, and if you can't see the difference between releasing something with a canceled cameo like Manson and a Roman Polanski feature, well, I don't know what to tell you. I think the messaging in this thread is that Criterion is
not as guarded around this as they once were, but... this wasn't a "Criterion thing," it was a most-media thing across networks and streaming platforms making safe choices in line with the pulse of the nation
Apologies for the lack of clarity in my sentence — there was some editing on my phone involved — but the word “regularly” was meant to collectively refer to “releases that fly in the face of “Criterion is not releasing things because they are too ‘woke’” assertions. I probably should have added Leni Riefenstahl to that list as she has been severely problematic long before Criterion’s 2017 release of her film
Olympiad.
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2022 1:47 am
by therewillbeblus
swo17 wrote: Tue Oct 18, 2022 1:40 am
Well, he
was, 30+ years ago
You’re not suggesting that people can rehabilitate or change are you?
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2022 2:00 am
by DeprongMori
therewillbeblus wrote: Tue Oct 18, 2022 1:47 am
swo17 wrote: Tue Oct 18, 2022 1:40 am
Well, he
was, 30+ years ago
You’re not suggesting that people can rehabilitate or change are you?
Has he though? I thoroughly believe in rehabilitation and the necessity of allowing for that possibility. (His victim has forgiven him.) I also find a major difference between something like expressing TERFy opinions and committing anal rape of a minor. (
And this was apparently only one incident of many.) Such a criminal act has (and should have) more severe consequences — of a criminal nature.
Criterion *should* have major pause about releasing a film like
Last Tango in Paris as, according to Maria Schneider, the lead actress was essentially raped on camera and it is even present in the film itself. That’s a different matter than choosing not to release any film by Bertolucci because of what he did on
Tango.
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2022 4:10 am
by therewillbeblus
I think swo's point is that to define him as a problem now discounts the possibility of work he's done behind the scenes over 30 years. The verb being active ("is") reduces his worth in the present based on the events of the past, though we shouldn't assume he's rehabilitated and this pivoting doesn't necessitate forgiveness either. I agree with everything in your first paragraph too
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2022 4:16 am
by swo17
It's none of my business frankly, but he's been married to Emmanuelle Seigner since 1989 and to my knowledge has been accused of no improprieties since then
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2022 6:52 am
by ryannichols7
thank you for waiting for this late night edition of the Speculation Roundup! our first to commemorate the 2023 calendar year. once again, a boatload of surprises and many frequently guessed titles remain unreleased..
Lars Von Trier's Europe Trilogy -
Europa teased the day prior on social media,
Element of Crime stills updated morning of, films on channel - otherwise a total surprise!
The Adventures of Baron Munchausen - first Gilliam title on UHD; complete and total surprise, also only second Sony license for UHD (after
Devil in a Blue Dress)
Imitation of Life - left field Universal license; total surprise
This Is Not a Burial, It's a Resurrection - incredibly left field surprise
Bergman Island - ditto; an IFC license
----------------------
DVD to Bluray upgrades:
0080
The Element of Crime
0454
Europa
----------------------
I am still behind on doing the Retroactive Speculation Roundup for 2021-2022, but I will have it for documentation purposes.
excluding the free space title of
Europa, not a
single person correctly guessed any other title upon unlocking the thread. however, I always like to crown a winner, so...
beamish14 wrote: Wed Aug 10, 2022 9:52 pm
I wonder if more Gilliam is on the horizon. A 4K of
Baron Munchausen or
Tideland? Both
Zero Theorem and
Don Quixote are ridiculously barebones releases
beamish14 is the only person to suggest this! not a single person
ever guessed a
Europa upgrade or
Imitation of Life (even the Sirk version), which I find similarly impressive. in fact, you'd have to go back a ways to see that
black&huge wrote: Tue May 14, 2019 7:47 am
Taking off
Rocco and his brothers
Kafka
Hombre
Element of crime upgrade
Moral tales upgrade
black&huge suggested
Element of Crime three years ago!
let us all have better luck next month, and not let this be an omen for our speculation skills in 2023. until next month!
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2022 11:51 am
by Maltic
therewillbeblus wrote: Tue Oct 18, 2022 4:10 am
I think swo's point is that to define him as a problem now discounts the possibility of work he's done behind the scenes over 30 years. The verb being active ("is") reduces his worth in the present based on the events of the past, though we shouldn't assume he's rehabilitated and this pivoting doesn't necessitate forgiveness either. I agree with everything in your first paragraph too
He seems to identify with Dreyfus, which would not exactly be asking forgiveness.
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2022 5:57 pm
by Hogfather
dwk wrote: Mon Oct 17, 2022 10:46 pm
The menus were done by someone that works with Criterion who assumed they were going to release
The House that Jack Built. They were not done in house. It is entirely possible that IFC offered it to Scream Factory first. Or maybe Criterion planned on releasing it, but the decesion makers hated the film when they saw it. We just don't know what the happened.
The way that I read the tweet about it was that Scream Factory had offered IFC a better deal than Criterion.
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2022 2:18 am
by knives
Maltic wrote: Tue Oct 18, 2022 11:51 am
therewillbeblus wrote: Tue Oct 18, 2022 4:10 am
I think swo's point is that to define him as a problem now discounts the possibility of work he's done behind the scenes over 30 years. The verb being active ("is") reduces his worth in the present based on the events of the past, though we shouldn't assume he's rehabilitated and this pivoting doesn't necessitate forgiveness either. I agree with everything in your first paragraph too
He seems to identify with Dreyfus, which would not exactly be asking forgiveness.
He could probably relate to Dreyfus on multiple levels that have nothing to do with the trial over his rape.
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2022 2:43 pm
by Maltic
True enough, but the film did give me a vague feeling that he equated his situation - regarding the rape case - and Dreyfus'. Maybe I misread the film, or maybe he was just being cheeky (as he often is). It's been two years since I saw it.
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2022 3:08 pm
by rrenault
I could be wrong, but I get the impression Criterion aren't really prioritizing the mid-century legacy foreign titles like Breathless, The 400 Blows, 8 1/2, L'Avventura and so forth. Presumably, they won't bother with those on UHD unless the elements support an almost guaranteed reference disc. In The Mood For Love, being more recent and in color, is probably an easy enough sell to make it worth doing a less than stellar UHD. Saying that, we'd probably get Seven Samurai on UHD if the rights issues with Toho were sorted out. Rashomon and L'Avventura, for what it's worth, have both been blu-ray only'd in France within the past year, despite 4K sources. I'm not sure if the French blu-ray of L'Avventura from Lobster Films uses a different master than the Criterion.
Of the "classic" black and white foreign titles, The Seventh Seal and La Règle du Jeu already have reference UHD releases in Europe.
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2022 5:05 pm
by M-A
rrenault wrote: Wed Oct 19, 2022 3:08 pm
I could be wrong, but I get the impression Criterion aren't really prioritizing the mid-century legacy foreign titles like Breathless, The 400 Blows, 8 1/2, L'Avventura and so forth. Presumably, they won't bother with those on UHD unless the elements support an almost guaranteed reference disc. In The Mood For Love, being more recent and in color, is probably an easy enough sell to make it worth doing a less than stellar UHD. Saying that, we'd probably get Seven Samurai on UHD if the rights issues with Toho were sorted out. Rashomon and L'Avventura, for what it's worth, have both been blu-ray only'd in France within the past year, despite 4K sources. I'm not sure if the French blu-ray of L'Avventura from Lobster Films uses a different master than the Criterion.
Of the "classic" black and white foreign titles, The Seventh Seal and La Règle du Jeu already have reference UHD releases in Europe.
Rashomon's restoration is actually a 4K scan, 2K restoration. As for L'avventura, it is apparently the
new restoration according to a user on the dvdclassik forum. However, Lobster films encoding is usually very poor so I wouldn't be surprised if it was worse than the Criterion disc, like how their stagecoach blu-ray is from a newer restoration, but I think it looks worse than the Criterion disc because of this.
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2022 7:43 pm
by swo17
Maltic wrote: Wed Oct 19, 2022 2:43 pm
True enough, but the film did give me a vague feeling that he equated his situation - regarding the rape case - and Dreyfus'. Maybe I misread the film, or maybe he was just being cheeky (as he often is). It's been two years since I saw it.
If there are any parallels, I should think they have solely to do with his harsh sentence in the court of public opinion, as opposed to any notion that he should have gotten a free pass for rape
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2022 7:44 pm
by yoloswegmaster
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2022 8:08 pm
by swo17
Yikes
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2022 8:16 pm
by FrauBlucher
Layoffs and tee-shirts, ugh. Not good times.
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2022 9:16 pm
by hearthesilence
Ugh. Is this the first time they've announced a major layoff like this?
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:23 pm
by pzadvance
“a reorganization intended to prepare the company for the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead, which are markedly different from the ones we had built ourselves up to address in the past.”
Sounds ominous…
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:29 pm
by Matt
I don’t really recall them ever making public announcements about personnel at all outside of when William Becker died or when Ashley Clark joined the staff.
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:30 pm
by paulm
hearthesilence wrote: Thu Oct 20, 2022 9:16 pm
Ugh. Is this the first time they've announced a major layoff like this?
The
IndieWire article says they had a round of layoffs in 2013.
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:32 pm
by domino harvey
They probably only announced because their let-go staff is probably of the terminally online sort who would break it first if they didn’t get ahead of it.
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2022 11:01 pm
by yoloswegmaster
They definitely weren't terminally online since they were let go yesterday and we're just hearing about it through an article today.
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2022 6:29 am
by Calvin
I obviously feel for those who have lost their jobs but it's kind of incredible that Criterion had 80 employees - most other boutique labels I know have single or near-single figures!
Re: Criterion Discussion and Random Speculation Volume 7
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2022 6:59 am
by dwk
I would assume that a large chunk of those 80+ employees was made up of their in-house restoration team.
I did see that the person that was hired last year (I think it was last year) as an Associate Web Editor (who, among other things, was responsible for the announcements) tweeted that she was one of the people let go.