Re: Cannes 2010
Posted: Sat May 15, 2010 7:37 am
Naruse being a second-rate Ozu, of course.Michael Kerpan wrote:You have SUCH a way with words,
Naruse being a second-rate Ozu, of course.Michael Kerpan wrote:You have SUCH a way with words,
Have you seen it then?Nothing wrote:Still he's likely to get something, if only because the selection is so thin this year + he happens to be in vogue, whatever that means. But the Palme? That would be stretching it, although hardly unprecendented
the trailer certainly makes it look like the Russian Pearl Harbor minus the love story....pure schlock. reading all of those links I have to say I'm fascinated by the system that keeps a guy like that in such a position of esteem despite the universal dislike for what he's become. Can you imagine if Michael Bay and Bush were best friends and he made a film about the gloriously patriotic Gulf War? Russians never cease to fascinate me in terms of their culture and devotion to propaganda. They have a unique similarity with the U.S. in terms of the incredible diversity of their citizenry - though in their case it's a matter of geographic immensity rather than immigration - and a devotion to language as a means of uniting them all as one. But the societies could not possibly be more different, as well as their histories. I've always longed for more candid cinema from the Russian perspective on the Cold War, but exported stuff always seems to be more bombastic. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated - and there has to be a whole host of stuff out there that we in the U.S. have not had a chance to see that we should. Seems like a vein Criterion should be mining too.Michael Kerpan wrote:IMDB has a capsule summary:rs98762001 wrote:A sequel to Burnt By The Sun makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. It's been a long time since I've seen the film (which I remember as being wonderful) but didn't pretty much all the major characters get killed at the end?!
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0403645/plotsummary" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
This sounds astonishingly like the most propagandistic films actually made in the USSR during WW2.
I can tell you that Michael Bay didn't get to premiere Pearl Harbor on an US Aircraft Carrier because the film was politically ambivalent. I'm not clear how the Russian movie's description would make it more of a propaganda piece than the vast majority of American films, though most of the rest of the world has state funded film productions, so it's easier to point fingers.HistoryProf wrote:Can you imagine if Michael Bay and Bush were best friends and he made a film about the gloriously patriotic Gulf War? Russians never cease to fascinate me in terms of their culture and devotion to propaganda.
Well, firstly, AW's obtuse visual aesthetic has always been his strongest suit, but I can't see this being particularly persuasive to the likes of Beckinsale and Burton. Secondly, to award a state-funded Chinese Thai film at this moment in time would like awarding an Israeli film a week after the Sabra and Shatila massacre - can the jury really be that insensitive (especially a leftist like Del Toro?). Perhaps.Duncan Hopper wrote:Have you seen it then?
Geoff Andrew, tweeting for Sight and Sound seemed to like it.Nothing wrote: A Screaming Man. Oh dear, I didn't realise this was from the director of the God-awful Daratt.
'A few boos after the Cannes press screening (presumably from cineastes who feel that Kiarostami has sold out) will not discourage buyers from looking at a title that has good audience genes.'A captivating cinematic divertissement, Certified Copy marries post-modern reality games with mature romantic comedy in a single breezy and thought-provoking package. This is Kiarostami’s most commercial film to date - not only because of the presence of a radiant Juliette Binoche or its photogenic Tuscan settings, but because it is the first of the Iranian auteur’s metacinematic experiments to conform, at least on one level, to Hollywood genre conventions. The pitch could well be: “imagine a middle-aged Before Sunrise rolled up with Under the Tuscan Sun but spiked with elements of The Game”.
Review to look out for is Geoff Andrew's in Time Out or Sight and Sound, he being a major AK critical supporter...Certified Copy"
Bottom Line: Kiarostami's sardonic reflection on marriage is playful, engaging Euro art cinema under the Tuscan sun.
CANNES -- After years of working on photography, poetry and more experimental films, Abbas Kiarostami makes an engaging return to narrative cinema in a delicate, bittersweet comedy set in romantic Italy. "Certified Copy" slyly explores the ins and outs of marriage and the many ways men and women fail to think alike. French star Juliette Binoche will give the film a leg up in Europe, though wide international audiences are probably not in the cards for such an off-beat item. This erudite film is spoken in three languages, English, French and a bit of Italian.
The sardonically humorous story of a man and a woman whose marriage has gone cold echoes Roberto Rossellini's critically revered "Voyage in Italy" (1954), in which a British couple played by George Sanders and Ingrid Bergman come to Naples on the verge of divorce and find reconciliation amid the mysteries of nature, art and religious belief. Kiarostami is not so optimistic.
ellipsis7 wrote:Shouting is not a word I associate with AK's cinema...
Xan Brooks @ Film Guardian online concurs, while acknowledging opinion differs...Certified Copy (2009)
Director: Abbas Kiarostami
Reviewed at the 2010 Cannes Film Festival
The best film so far in this year’s Cannes competition, Abbbas Kiarostami’s first feature made outside Iran is in many ways a departure in terms of style and content, yet at the same time it is utterly Kiarostami and one couldn’t really imagine it having been made by anyone else. In short, it’s simply the tale of a day in the life of an English writer, in Tuscany to promote his latest book, and a French woman who brings her 12-year-old son along with her to hear him speak.
In fact, it's far more complicated than that, and certainly far more ambiguous: after a while it becomes apparent that the man may have known the woman for some years – indeed, they may even be man and wife. Certainly, during the course of a brief day trip to a nearby village, where they do a little sightseeing and a lot of talking, they run the gamut of emotions as they discuss first matters of representation – the man’s book is concerned with issues to do with artistic originals and copies – and then concerns rather closer to home: relationships between men and women, parents and children, and then, it would appear, specific details in the history of their own relationship.
It’s an extraordinary film, steadily building to a very moving final scene by way of a seemingly meandering but in fact very focused narrative held together by meticulous and subtle mise-en-scène. The performances – by Juliette Binoche and opera-singer William Shimell – are excellent, while the whole thing not only touches on all manner of male-female concerns (I imagine everyone will recognise something of themselves at some point in the film) but develops a number of recurrent Kiarostami themes about art and nature, reality and representation, life and death. Superb.
Author: Geoff Andrew
I also catch the evening showing of Certified Copy (Copie Conforme), a Tuscany-set romance from Abbas Kiarostami (Iranian) that stars Juliette Binoche (French) and the singer William Shimell (British). This seemed to split opinion but I liked it a lot. Binoche and Shimell meet for the first time and drive out to a hilltop town where they first accept and then furnish the misconception that they are actually a couple, married for 15 years and struggling to keep the flame alight. Shimell plays an art historian and there is much talk of copies and forgeries, what's real and what's fake. But what this quiet, contemplative film seems to be suggesting is that we are all forgeries and that we dramatise our lives for the benefit of ourselves and those around us. And if that's the human condition, who says it's not authentic?
Todd Brown at Twitch Film, however, gives a very positive review for Outrage writing that -Kitano is a gifted Japanese director who has made many films I admire, but this must be his worst.
and Roger Ebert on Godard's Film: Socialisme...he (Kitano) is absolutely back in peak form...it is clearly his best since Zatoichi and one which stands comfortably beside both Sonatine and Fireworks to create a trio of truly iconic international crime films.