Re: 173 The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 9:45 am
My understanding is that Tales of Hoffmann is indeed the next all-stops-out Film Foundation restoration.
That's cracking good news. The oop Criterion release was great at the time, but there were some scenes that had bad fringing problems.MichaelB wrote:My understanding is that Tales of Hoffmann is indeed the next all-stops-out Film Foundation restoration.
Not exactly, Nick. The ITV contains the 24-minute documentary A Profile of “The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp which will also appear on the new Crit (and was on the old CC DVD). Everything outside the resto demo on the new CC BD was on the old DVD.peerpee wrote:The ITV Blu-ray only contains a 4-5 minute restoration demonstration with Scorsese, so an additional Scorsese interview, and a separate Schoonmaker interview look to be exclusives.
I should have made it clear that I was referring to newly made stuff. I watched the old 12-year-old ITV piece again, it contains some priceless interview footage, but could do to be edited down (removing clips from the film and a bit of Fry's flimflam).triodelover wrote:Not exactly, Nick. The ITV contains the 24-minute documentary A Profile of “The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp which will also appear on the new Crit (and was on the old CC DVD). Everything outside the resto demo on the new CC BD was on the old DVD.
Your examples (Melville, Ozu) are of grading work that Criterion did themselves a while ago. The grade for BLIMP has been locked down. The 2K master is finished. It would be very surprising if Criterion dicked with the colours on this in any way.David's comments about color grading were spot on, although I don't think it's as a big issue in motion as it is when compared with the specific scenes in the resto demo. Given Criterion's rather mixed history with color, e.g. Ozu, Le Cercle Rouge, one might wait and see the result of their efforts before chucking the ITV which, all in all, is a stunning presentation. I just can see any reason to assume automatically that the CC will be better, since the ITV is so very good.
MoC have put out quite a few crap covers recently (Onibaba/Clouzot/Chabrol/Yamanaka), so I could imagine a still with some text slapped on it. I'm afraid they're not following any logic at all anymore. Let's not get into a cover art scrap, though. We all know that Criterion like to put their own stamp on things, and they only very occasionally use the original poster art – when to do otherwise would be such a crying shame (ROSEMARY'S BABY and PICKPOCKET are good examples).The ITV steelbook is no work of art, but the CC Blimp cover is one of the most disappointing they've ever done, particularly considering what they could have done with the poster art. (MoC wouldn't have put out a piece of crap like that for the film and you know it.)
I agree that an original poster, especially when great ones exist, should be used when possible, and I wish Criterion would do it more (ROSEMARY'S BABY, PICKPOCKET, etc) but I don't agree that Criterion's new effort is "shitty" though. It's needlessly reimagined. Words cannot describe how much I hate ITV's SteelBook in comparison.Like I said in the other thread, it's not evocative of the film at all - the profile of Candy could as well a propaganda poster "Hun" from WWI, and the Union Jack hour glass reminds me of those generic album covers in the discount bins of the '60s labelled "Greatest Hits of the British Invasion" performed by some third-rate house band with Beatle haircuts. At least ITV gives us Deborah Kerr - a photoshopped Kerr, but it's her nonetheless.(However, after all is said, I'm so very fond of the film that I'll likely double dip, sh***y CC cover and all.
)
Point taken. But if the grading and master are locked down, aren't we more likely to see a transfer that's essentially the same as the ITV? (Genuine question as I am uncertain how far one goes in the process before the things that David brought up cannot be changed.)peerpee wrote:Your examples (Melville, Ozu) are of grading work that Criterion did themselves a while ago. The grade for BLIMP has been locked down. The 2K master is finished. It would be very surprising if Criterion dicked with the colours on this in any way.triodelover wrote:David's comments about color grading were spot on, although I don't think it's as a big issue in motion as it is when compared with the specific scenes in the resto demo. Given Criterion's rather mixed history with color, e.g. Ozu, Le Cercle Rouge, one might wait and see the result of their efforts before chucking the ITV which, all in all, is a stunning presentation. I just can see any reason to assume automatically that the CC will be better, since the ITV is so very good.
Your turn of phrase is ever so much nicer than mine.peerpee wrote: It's needlessly reimagined. Words cannot describe how much I hate ITV's SteelBook in comparison.
Yes – in this instance, I would be expecting a Criterion Blu-ray that looks very similar to the new ITV Blu-ray, that is, unless there is something wrong with the ITV. I'm not fully up-to-speed with what David has been saying about it, so I'll go back and read... If Criterion are using the same finished 2K master, the only things that we could conceivably expect to be different is the Blu-ray encoding technique, which might slightly affect certain aspects of the picture (but not major things).triodelover wrote:Point taken. But if the grading and master are locked down, aren't we more likely to see a transfer that's essentially the same as the ITV? (Genuine question as I am uncertain how far one goes in the process before the things that David brought up cannot be changed.)
My understanding is that the Film Foundation is tackling Hoffmann while A Canterbury Tale is a BFI project.peerpee wrote:I've heard some pretty solid things about A CANTERBURY TALE being up next for a full restoration, alongside HOFFMANN. All the others (IKWIG, ROSALINDA, ELUSIVE, GONE TO EARTH, etc) can't come soon enough though!
So it's a tossup on the main feature between ITV and CC and the CC wins on extras (no surprise there).Minkin wrote:Bluray.com
I did note no discernible difference in the one shot from the cafe (showing the band) common to his reviews of both discs. But that capture is not the same one you referenced in our earlier discussion.david hare wrote:I don't know if Svet is reading this but I am going to ask him elsewhere to compare the three shots I remarked on from the Resto dem and the Crit movie files for color temp.
Hear, hear!Matt wrote:Now let's have a restoration of I Know Where I'm Going!
The 4K screening I saw at the Academy last summer was just absolutely mind boggling. better even than the 4K of Lawrence of Arabia or Wizard of Oz seen at the same place (otoh, I was about 100 feet further away for blimp, and off axis).Matt wrote:It cannot be overstated how good this film looks on this Blu-ray. Now let's have a restoration of I Know Where I'm Going!
The Edge of the World is available on an excellent Blu-ray from BFI. The extras include the complete Return documentary, among others.movielocke wrote:I Know Where I'm Going definitely needs an upgrade! I'm sure the bluray could hold the entirety of the bonus film as well, since the DVD is just an excerpt, iirc.
Wow. I only wanted to point out that there's a high-quality version available because you seemed to be interested in a complete version of the film. I'm not privy to your collection or your collecting habits. Sorry to intrude.movielocke wrote:At last count I had 221 region one films I own and have never seen, aka blind buys, (and that's not counting numerous bonus film supplements, like on Blow Out or Kes), so there is absolutely zero reason for me to go region free when I can't even keep up with one region's releases. But much kudos to those people who can consume more than their region's worth of releases, that's pretty gobsmacking.
Not to mention, that I have probably 400 discs I've bought because I love the film, but I've never gotten around to watching the disc.