Page 4 of 10

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 3:53 pm
by FilmFanSea
Narshty wrote:Stop, Michael, you're killing me with your exhaustive coverage.
Yeah, he really went that extra mile in describing every nuance of the extras, where a lazier reviewer might have just listed the specs from the Criterion press release. =D>

Perhaps I'm being too harsh. Michael did have a deadline to make, since the release date is nearly upon us: September 5th.

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 4:01 pm
by Napoleon
To an untrained eye it appears as though he's just opened up an old text file with a review of Seven Samurai and added two short paragraphs for sound and vision. To an untrained eye.

Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 12:46 pm
by Narshty
Hmmm - over a week later and nowhere else has got a review up yet. Do you reckon they've actually got a copy, or just looked at the specs on the site, hedged their bets that Criterion weren't going to fuck it up and dashed that off so as to get the "exclusive"?

Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 2:49 pm
by Brianruns10
Why would they get a a screener so much sooner than everyone else? I'll wait for DVD Beaver.

Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 3:13 pm
by Jonny Pasadena
I'm a reviewer at digitallyobsessed.com, and my review copy just arrived. Stay tuned.

Posted: Fri Aug 18, 2006 3:20 pm
by Jimaku
Narshty wrote:Hmmm - over a week later and nowhere else has got a review up yet. Do you reckon they've actually got a copy, or just looked at the specs on the site, hedged their bets that Criterion weren't going to fuck it up and dashed that off so as to get the "exclusive"?
That review is completely bogus.

The quotation from the film at the top of the review is taken from the OLD subtitle translation, not the new one. A clear giveaway. Add to that the fact that the review of the transfer is laughably vague and that there's no reason why Criterion would give him an exclusive review copy ahead of anybody else. Total B.S.

Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 2:49 pm
by Kristoffer4
Beaver review/comparision =D>

"Knowing Criterion's commitment and their diligent work ethic we expected a reparatory improvement, but what they produced has far outweighed any expectations fans could have hoped for..."

Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 2:52 pm
by HerrSchreck
Looking good.

Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 6:30 pm
by kinjitsu
HerrSchreck wrote:Looking good.

Wao! Exceptionally so. More caps from the new disc independent of the comparisons would be terrific.

Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 6:32 pm
by colinr0380
Just the title screen looks incredibly sharp compared to the others.

Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 6:55 pm
by King of Kong
Looks stunning. Glad I pre-ordered it! :D

Posted: Sun Aug 20, 2006 7:04 pm
by Anthony
I'm in tears... TEARS OF JOY!!!

Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 12:43 am
by Artois
Great release, roll-on HD-DVD Criterion...

Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 12:44 am
by exte
Only three screencaps of actual action? It's a 3.5 hour epic Gary, why not more? Aside from Blade Runner, this is the dvd release event of the year. Cut us a break, would you please...

Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 2:19 am
by kinjitsu
DVD Movie Central review!

• Loaded with action-packed screencaps!


Image

Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 4:17 am
by Matt
exte wrote:Cut us a break, would you please...
It's a DVD review, not a fotonovela. Screencaps eat bandwidth.

Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 12:21 pm
by The Invunche
There's more than enough to warrant a double dip. No need for further pictures.

Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 4:58 pm
by atcolomb
There is a review of the dvd at DVDFILE.COM which says that it is the frontrunner to the best dvd release of 2006 so far!! =D>

Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 5:13 pm
by kinjitsu
Click here to read the DVDFILE review.

Déjà vu!

Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 12:16 am
by exte
Matt wrote:
exte wrote:Cut us a break, would you please...
It's a DVD review, not a fotonovela. Screencaps eat bandwidth.
Screencaps of the five other worthless dvds eat bandwith. Why not just post a review of the new dvd by itself? Thanks.

Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 12:52 am
by kinjitsu
exte wrote:Screencaps of the five other worthless dvds eat bandwith. Why not just post a review of the new dvd by itself? Thanks.
Déjà vu all over again! :o

Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 5:49 am
by The Invunche
exte wrote:Screencaps of the five other worthless dvds eat bandwith. Why not just post a review of the new dvd by itself? Thanks.
Because it isn't your website.

Jesus H Christ. The guys at the beaver do their best and still some people complain because it isn't 100% like they want it.

Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 8:00 pm
by Anonymous
Hey guys,

Just wanted to let you know I recently posted a review of this set over at DVD Talk.

I also included a few small screenshots and comparisons with the old 1998 Criterion release, though they're nowhere near as spiffy as the ones from DVD Beaver's excellent review.

Here's a link

Comments and criticisms are more than appreciated!

Thanks,

Randy Miller III
DVD Talk

Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 11:41 pm
by Gigi M.
Excellent review Randy. Thanks very much for posting.

Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 12:29 am
by kinjitsu
gigimonagas wrote:Excellent review Randy. Thanks very much for posting.
Truly, and welcome aboard!