Page 4 of 4
Re:
Posted: Sat Sep 06, 2025 10:18 pm
by domino harvey
Get in line, Matt!

Re: Salacious Biographies
Posted: Sat Sep 06, 2025 11:02 pm
by Matt
"Get him shipwrecked" [-o<
Re: Salacious Biographies
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2025 12:12 am
by Black Hat
Where is this from, and what on earth is "extreme underwear"?
Re: Salacious Biographies
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2026 12:24 pm
by flyonthewall2983
Don Felder’s book on his time in the Eagles definitely counts, I’m sure he pulled some punches but seemed less eager to by the time his interview was filmed for the band’s documentary a decade ago, not that far off from when he actually wrote the book.
The new Pink Floyd oral history by Mark Blake, is actually quite good in this regard but still definitely bitchy in some respects. By letting them (and their colleagues and friends) speak for themselves the larger picture of their drama takes shape and you realize how lucky we were to have them at all at certain times.
Re: Salacious Biographies
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2026 6:01 pm
by Lowry_Sam
Seeing this thread topic pop up prompted interest in finding out more details about one of the Hollywood Golden Era stars that probably had some of the most outrageous stories/scandals surrounding her: Hedy Lamarr. I enjoyed the recent documentary, but it was much more focused on her professional career (including outside of Hollywood) and didn't tackle some of the more scandalous claims about her personal life. Anyone know a good source for these rumors & their veracity?
Re: Salacious Biographies
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2026 5:38 pm
by Black Hat
What are the "scandalous claims"?
WIth regard to the Pink Floyd book and others like it, am I the only person who feels it's too much? I guess as long as there's a market for it, these things will come out, but what else is there left to say about any of these bands? It's long past time to move on, but of course, we never will let go.
Re: Salacious Biographies
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2026 10:30 pm
by hearthesilence
Pink Floyd is so broadly popular with so many devotees, there's probably an insatiable market for them. I wouldn't be part of it, though I like certain things they've done quite a bit (particularly the earlier records with Barrett).
I haven't followed them lately simply because everything I've seen flashing by in the news involves Waters and Gilmour fighting over conflicting views about Israel, and as much as I've followed everything that's been happening with regards to Israel and Palestine, I draw the line at hearing Pink Floyd duking it out.
Re: Salacious Biographies
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2026 10:46 pm
by Lowry_Sam
Actually there’s more on politics. While Waters may have been against Israel’s genocide, he turned a blind eye to what Putin did to the point of meeting him and repeating his propaganda. So in the battle of egos, there’s really no saint.
Re: Salacious Biographies
Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2026 9:11 pm
by thirtyframesasecond
Waters bought into the "The West is always bad, those bad guys aren't" kool-aid a long time ago.