Re: MoC Facebook & Twitter
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:30 am
:-$
MoC wrote:A report from a supporter "I've contacted/complained to @Phaidon directly. Their response was quick and dismissive, as though they have been fielding a lot of these kinds of calls... ...We might be wearing them down!
With a WALL OF SOUND!swo17 wrote:I think we should all mail in printouts of Nabob's new avatar.
Just one of many bad news stories, I fear we will have more of the same again tonight.We're just one of hundreds of independent labels who have lost all their stock in the Sony DADC fire at Enfield. Shocking.
However! The best place to still purchase our titles is Amazon or Eureka direct, who both still have plenty of stock
I've confirmed with one of my BFI contacts that the fire only affected stock, not masters. Obviously, it's too early to say what the long-term outcome will be, though I assume it's covered by insurance.perkizitore wrote:Will any titles go OOP because of this? You don't reprint some titles that don't sell well, so i am bit concerned.
Might you also do the reverse, bump up the likes of IL GRIDO & LA NOTTE to dual format editions too?...peerpee wrote: One upshot of this, is that we'll be fast-tracking new Dual Format editions of most of our Blu-ray only releases.
I believe that is what he means. As far as I'm aware, Masters of Cinema don't have any truly Bluray exclusives at the moment (at least not until Touch of Evil and Silent Running come out). Hopefully Amazon will reduce the price of all the current Blurays soon, like they did with the BFI stock.Askew wrote:Is it possible for you to put out duel format releases of things like Sunrise or City Girl that have individual dvd and bluray releases?
"All our stock was there - more than 300 titles in our catalogue," said Jonathan Rushton, head of publicity at Artificial Eye, which has critical hits like Winter's Bone, Of Gods and Men and Andrei Tarkovsky's Three Colours trilogy in its back catalogue.MichaelB wrote:The warehouse fire story has made the national press.
Well it might not be worth contacting the journalist about, but it's certainly funny, especially when the information is available in one Google click. A lot of stuff in articles is not essential to the big picture, but still, God is in the detail!MichaelB wrote:Is it really worth flagging up such an obvious typo? Especially as it makes no difference whatsoever to the point of the piece?
Fixed, FWIW. Considering everyone there has their hands full dealing with issues somewhat more important that correct attribution of films a decade and a half old, we could cut them some slack.Der Spieler wrote:Well it might not be worth contacting the journalist about, but it's certainly funny, especially when the information is available in one Google click. A lot of stuff in articles is not essential to the big picture, but still, God is in the detail!MichaelB wrote:Is it really worth flagging up such an obvious typo? Especially as it makes no difference whatsoever to the point of the piece?
But you're not doing any work right now, yes?peerpee wrote:We don't think this is going to be a massive problem. A few titles may be not available for a few weeks, but everything will be back in print as soon as possible!
One upshot of this, is that we'll be fast-tracking new Dual Format editions of most of our Blu-ray only releases.
That seems to be the case, as they took donw their blu-ray sale page (due to low stock), but kept up the new release and out of print sale pages.MichaelB wrote:Yes, presumably genuinely OOP stock wasn't being stored there, on the grounds that it was no longer sellable.