Twilight Time / Redwind

Vinegar Syndrome, Deaf Crocodile, Imprint, Kino, and more
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
EddieLarkin
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 2:25 pm

Re: Twilight Time

#851 Post by EddieLarkin »

Turns out it was Born Yesterday (1950).
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Twilight Time

#852 Post by domino harvey »

Clue 2: Joe Eszterhas comes again.

Clue # 2: Born Yesterday's author Garson Kanin sold the rights of the play to Columbia for a then unheard of $1 million dollars. Joe Eszterhas repeated the feat years later by selling the script to Basic Instinct (1992) for a then unheard of 3 million dollars. Hence Joe Eszterhas comes again.
Image
User avatar
Feego
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:30 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Twilight Time

#853 Post by Feego »

Wow. They could have just as easily given the clue "Melanie Griffith comes again." It would have been equally stupid but at least slightly more relevant (you know, because she like, starred in the remake or whatever?). There is truly nothing fun about attempting to guess these clues.
User avatar
jindianajonz
Jindiana Jonz Abrams
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 12:11 am

Re: Twilight Time

#854 Post by jindianajonz »

domino harvey wrote:
Clue 2: Joe Eszterhas comes again.

Clue # 2: Born Yesterday's author Garson Kanin sold the rights of the play to Columbia for a then unheard of $1 million dollars. Joe Eszterhas repeated the feat years later by selling the script to Basic Instinct (1992) for a then unheard of 3 million dollars. Hence Joe Eszterhas comes again.
Image
Makes sense
User avatar
matrixschmatrix
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 3:26 am

Re: Twilight Time

#855 Post by matrixschmatrix »

I was more reminded of this
User avatar
CSM126
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:22 pm
Location: The Room
Contact:

Re: Twilight Time

#856 Post by CSM126 »

domino harvey wrote:
Clue 2: Joe Eszterhas comes again.

Clue # 2: Born Yesterday's author Garson Kanin sold the rights of the play to Columbia for a then unheard of $1 million dollars. Joe Eszterhas repeated the feat years later by selling the script to Basic Instinct (1992) for a then unheard of 3 million dollars. Hence Joe Eszterhas comes again.
Uh... What? I'm seriously completely and utterly lost on what this even means and how that clue is supposed to equal Born Yesterday.
User avatar
EddieLarkin
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 2:25 pm

Re: Twilight Time

#857 Post by EddieLarkin »

New freebie promotion with this month's pre-orders (20th, 4pm EST), and a list of current releases that are reaching low stock:
Twilight Time wrote:We are often asked which titles are getting low in stock, so as we have pre-orders for 3 new titles coming on Nov 20th, as well as a signed-copy promotion for MINDWARP, here is a new low-stock list for any of you looking to pick up some back catalogue:

On Blu-ray - AS GOOD AS IT GETS, BYE BYE BIRDIE, THOSE MAGNIFICENT MEN IN THEIR FLYING MACHINES, ENEMY MINE, LEAVE HER TO HEAVEN, BELL, BOOK, & CANDLE, THE DRIVER - and on DVD - STAGECOACH.
User avatar
pointless
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 1:55 pm

Re: Royal Flash

#858 Post by pointless »

Royal Flash booklet artwork:

Image
Perkins Cobb
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:49 pm

Re: Twilight Time

#859 Post by Perkins Cobb »

Clue 2: Joe Eszterhas comes again.

Clue # 2: Born Yesterday's author Garson Kanin sold the rights of the play to Columbia for a then unheard of $1 million dollars. Joe Eszterhas repeated the feat years later by selling the script to Basic Instinct (1992) for a then unheard of 3 million dollars. Hence Joe Eszterhas comes again.
Just biting my tongue....
User avatar
pointless
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 1:55 pm

Guess the upcoming release 3 of 3

#860 Post by pointless »

Third guessing game:
Clue #1: The Method, an Italian muse, Spaghetti sauce, it all comes out in the wash.

Clue #2: Poor Marni Nixon… he “walked the line.”

Clue #3: Richard Brooks directed “too.”

Clue #4: Franciosa, Forsythe, Parks. Who’s on first? Or is it second?

Clue # 5: Chinatown has a two-fold connection. Even if once removed.

Clue #6: The Lady Vanishes for Billie Burke.

Clue #7: The producer was going to direct till Garland or "Red" intervened.
John Doe
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2012 9:41 am

Re: Twilight Time

#861 Post by John Doe »

Third mysterious title is Lynch's Wild at Heart.
User avatar
Gregory
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:07 pm

Re: Twilight Time

#862 Post by Gregory »

Rockin' bad news!
User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 11:24 pm

Re: Guess the upcoming release 3 of 3

#863 Post by zedz »

pointless wrote:Third guessing game:
Clue #1: The Method, an Italian muse, Spaghetti sauce, it all comes out in the wash.

Clue #2: Poor Marni Nixon… he “walked the line.”

Clue #3: Richard Brooks directed “too.”

Clue #4: Franciosa, Forsythe, Parks. Who’s on first? Or is it second?

Clue # 5: Chinatown has a two-fold connection. Even if once removed.

Clue #6: The Lady Vanishes for Billie Burke.

Clue #7: The producer was going to direct till Garland or "Red" intervened.
Wake me up when one of the answers is The Asthenic Syndrome. The clue for that would be "Strangers on a train? Or in the night?"
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

Re: Guess the upcoming release 3 of 3

#864 Post by domino harvey »

pointless wrote:Third guessing game:
Clue #1: The Method, an Italian muse, Spaghetti sauce, it all comes out in the wash.

Clue #2: Poor Marni Nixon… he “walked the line.”

Clue #3: Richard Brooks directed “too.”

Clue #4: Franciosa, Forsythe, Parks. Who’s on first? Or is it second?

Clue # 5: Chinatown has a two-fold connection. Even if once removed.

Clue #6: The Lady Vanishes for Billie Burke.

Clue #7: The producer was going to direct till Garland or "Red" intervened.
Has anything ever been as awful as these fucking clues, like ever? Does whoever wrote them post here so we can vote them worst member of the year? Jesus Christ
User avatar
EddieLarkin
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 2:25 pm

Re: Twilight Time

#865 Post by EddieLarkin »

Unlike many of Lynch releases in Region B, Universal's UK (Region B locked) disc is pretty fine. The only way I'd go for the TT is if it had a superior transfer (I suppose it'll be a different transfer either way since it's a different studio), or if it's uncensored, which the UK disc is not.
User avatar
Max von Mayerling
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 10:02 pm
Location: Ann Arbor, MI

Re: Twilight Time

#866 Post by Max von Mayerling »

Ugh. Obviously no hope that any of the relevant extras from the Lime Green set would be included.
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:25 pm
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Twilight Time

#867 Post by swo17 »

Why not? Doesn't TT commonly port over extras from previous DVD releases?
User avatar
Max von Mayerling
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 10:02 pm
Location: Ann Arbor, MI

Re: Twilight Time

#868 Post by Max von Mayerling »

Well, I could be wrong, but while I would think maybe they would port over the extras from the MGM dvd release, I think the extra footage on the Lime Green set only appeared there, under Lynch's auspices, so I'm assuming including that would require his involvement, which I am guessing is unlikely. But who knows? Not me.
User avatar
Moe Dickstein
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 3:19 am

Re: Twilight Time

#869 Post by Moe Dickstein »

No reason Lynch wouldn't work with them.
User avatar
Max von Mayerling
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 10:02 pm
Location: Ann Arbor, MI

Re: Twilight Time

#870 Post by Max von Mayerling »

Ok, you guys are getting my hopes up. Not super high, but up. Supposedly it is 120 minutes of deleted scenes?

Edit: On Facebook, Twilight Time says "Yes, we'll definitely be looking into [getting the Lime green Set's extensive deleted scenes for Wild at Heart.]" So I was clearly being too negative. Here's hoping, and I give them credit for at least saying they'll try.
User avatar
matrixschmatrix
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 3:26 am

Re: Twilight Time

#871 Post by matrixschmatrix »

I was considering importing the French release of this the other day and doing a bunch of research on it- I think I read that the UK blu is inferior PQ to the most recent French one. At any rate, I'll wait around until this comes out to pull the trigger on anything.

I wonder if Criterion explicitly passed on this- I thought it was a better movie than, say, Something Wild, but then Criterion could hardly be bothered with that one, so perhaps it's not the best comparison.
User avatar
EddieLarkin
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 2:25 pm

Re: Twilight Time

#872 Post by EddieLarkin »

matrixschmatrix wrote:I was considering importing the French release of this the other day and doing a bunch of research on it- I think I read that the UK blu is inferior PQ to the most recent French one. At any rate, I'll wait around until this comes out to pull the trigger on anything.
Colour appears to be a little better; still censored though.
User avatar
The Narrator Returns
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 10:35 pm

Re: Twilight Time

#873 Post by The Narrator Returns »

Honestly, it would be worse for me if they got the Lime Green Set deleted scenes. Then I wouldn't be able to safely ignore this release, which I would have preferred, because I ordered the DVD off Amazon just a few months ago.
User avatar
matrixschmatrix
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 3:26 am

Re: Twilight Time

#874 Post by matrixschmatrix »

EddieLarkin wrote:
matrixschmatrix wrote:I was considering importing the French release of this the other day and doing a bunch of research on it- I think I read that the UK blu is inferior PQ to the most recent French one. At any rate, I'll wait around until this comes out to pull the trigger on anything.
Colour appears to be a little better; still censored though.
I was referring to this release, but in reading further (here) it sounds as though it's actually the same master as the British release. I should have taken notes when I was looking into this, but at any rate any release with halfway decent PQ and the Lime Green extras will easily be worth the $40 to me.
User avatar
dwk
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 10:10 pm

Re: Twilight Time

#875 Post by dwk »

matrixschmatrix wrote: I wonder if Criterion explicitly passed on this- I thought it was a better movie than, say, Something Wild, but then Criterion could hardly be bothered with that one, so perhaps it's not the best comparison.
MGM may not have been willing to license Wild at Heart when Criterion made the deal for the batch of titles they did license.
Post Reply