Re: Awards Season 2019
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2020 3:13 am
I thought Joker was going to attract more viewers than Black Panther since it actually had a shot at winning some big categories. I'm not sure if many Black Panther fans would tune in just to check if it would win Costume Design or Best score.movielocke wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:54 pm So yes, black panther helped, but the highest ratings in the last ten years were for the 2014 ceremony when 12 years a slave won but was nominated with a strong box office wave of films like: captain Phillips, American hustle, gravity, and wolf of Wall Street.
I can only assume the VFX Society hasn’t seen Cats, because those VFX sucked.therewillbeblus wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2020 3:13 am VFX Society takes offense and slams Oscars for Cats ‘joke’
Audiences in M between the 72nd (2000) and 85th (2014) editions were hovering around 40M, with no peaks to speak of but 2 drops (75th-2003 and 80th-2008). Note that 2003 had LOTR The Two Towers amongst its nominees. Since 2015, audiences plumetted and have basically been halved (43.7M in 2014 --> 23.6M in 2020).movielocke wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:54 pm2020 is the all time low at 23.6 million viewers. 2019 was 29.6 million viewers (black panther). 2018 was the previous all time low with 26.5 million viewerstenia wrote:I also highly doubt nominating more popular movies will change anything, even if they end up winning. Was the ceremony where Black Panther got noms more watched ? I don't recall so.
So yes, black panther helped, but the highest ratings in the last ten years were for the 2014 ceremony when 12 years a slave won but was nominated with a strong box office wave of films like: captain Phillips, American hustle, gravity, and wolf of Wall Street. That year got 43 million viewers.
Yeah but why bring up the fuck up at the Oscar to award the best? Especially since it basically served as a way for Corden and Wilson to get a platform and distance themselves from the film publicly.. I think the Society’s point that the movie sucks aside from the effects is fair, and it’s probably just as much Hooper’s fault for doing all that last minute reworking, missing errors and releasing it anyways as the one in control. Just poor taste all around, and painful to watch those two actors dress up in costume just to make a “please like us” self-depreciating joke that was so obviously desperate, egocentric, dismissive of the category and condescending to the profession as an involuntary sacrifice.CSM126 wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2020 12:48 pmI can only assume the VFX Society hasn’t seen Cats, because those VFX sucked.therewillbeblus wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2020 3:13 am VFX Society takes offense and slams Oscars for Cats ‘joke’
1. Younger people not caring to tune into a 4 hour long awards showtenia wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2020 1:00 pmAudiences in M between the 72nd (2000) and 85th (2014) editions were hovering around 40M, with no peaks to speak of but 2 drops (75th-2003 and 80th-2008). Note that 2003 had LOTR The Two Towers amongst its nominees. Since 2015, audiences plumetted and have basically been halved (43.7M in 2014 --> 23.6M in 2020).movielocke wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:54 pm2020 is the all time low at 23.6 million viewers. 2019 was 29.6 million viewers (black panther). 2018 was the previous all time low with 26.5 million viewerstenia wrote:I also highly doubt nominating more popular movies will change anything, even if they end up winning. Was the ceremony where Black Panther got noms more watched ? I don't recall so.
So yes, black panther helped, but the highest ratings in the last ten years were for the 2014 ceremony when 12 years a slave won but was nominated with a strong box office wave of films like: captain Phillips, American hustle, gravity, and wolf of Wall Street. That year got 43 million viewers.
What's interesting however is the Nielsen ratings : these aren't plumetting. They're still oscillating as they've been for the past 20 years. 2019 was the best Nielsen rating since 2004, so in this regard, yup, it helped, but it's also clear that the 2019 26% rating equated to 29.6M while the 26.2% 2001 rating equated to... 42.9M.
So, did Black Panther helped ? Yes and no. The 26% Nielsen rating isn't much better than, say, 2016 24.3% one. That year, the average BP nom gross was $75.8m, half the 2019's one. It's not far from the 24.7% 2014 one either (average gross : $72m). Audiences also haven't droped compared to 2018, but they still dropped compared to 2017 and 2016. So it's just a blip in this regard.
What about the BO (at time of the noms announcement) ?
You're speaking about 2014. At the time of the noms announcement, it actually wasn't a very particuliar year. 2016's average gross is actually higher ($72m in 2014 vs $75.8m in 2016). And 2015, with better audience (but not a better Nielsen rating), had much smaller BP noms. And if you take 2012 and its insane combned gross ($1.2bn) and average gross ($119m), it wasn't that much worse or better than many other years pre-2014. It had a 21.2% Nielsen and 37.9m viewers, both fiures lower than 2012, 2013 or 2014's.
The real question I guess is : what happened since 2014 ?
But why is it that after 85 years all this people would suddenly stop caring about the Oscars in 2015?kcota17 wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2020 7:35 pm1. Younger people not caring to tune into a 4 hour long awards showtenia wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2020 1:00 pmAudiences in M between the 72nd (2000) and 85th (2014) editions were hovering around 40M, with no peaks to speak of but 2 drops (75th-2003 and 80th-2008). Note that 2003 had LOTR The Two Towers amongst its nominees. Since 2015, audiences plumetted and have basically been halved (43.7M in 2014 --> 23.6M in 2020).movielocke wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:54 pm 2020 is the all time low at 23.6 million viewers. 2019 was 29.6 million viewers (black panther). 2018 was the previous all time low with 26.5 million viewers
So yes, black panther helped, but the highest ratings in the last ten years were for the 2014 ceremony when 12 years a slave won but was nominated with a strong box office wave of films like: captain Phillips, American hustle, gravity, and wolf of Wall Street. That year got 43 million viewers.
What's interesting however is the Nielsen ratings : these aren't plumetting. They're still oscillating as they've been for the past 20 years. 2019 was the best Nielsen rating since 2004, so in this regard, yup, it helped, but it's also clear that the 2019 26% rating equated to 29.6M while the 26.2% 2001 rating equated to... 42.9M.
So, did Black Panther helped ? Yes and no. The 26% Nielsen rating isn't much better than, say, 2016 24.3% one. That year, the average BP nom gross was $75.8m, half the 2019's one. It's not far from the 24.7% 2014 one either (average gross : $72m). Audiences also haven't droped compared to 2018, but they still dropped compared to 2017 and 2016. So it's just a blip in this regard.
What about the BO (at time of the noms announcement) ?
You're speaking about 2014. At the time of the noms announcement, it actually wasn't a very particuliar year. 2016's average gross is actually higher ($72m in 2014 vs $75.8m in 2016). And 2015, with better audience (but not a better Nielsen rating), had much smaller BP noms. And if you take 2012 and its insane combned gross ($1.2bn) and average gross ($119m), it wasn't that much worse or better than many other years pre-2014. It had a 21.2% Nielsen and 37.9m viewers, both fiures lower than 2012, 2013 or 2014's.
The real question I guess is : what happened since 2014 ?
2. Older people not buying into the illusion of Hollywood glamour anymore and associating Hollywood with just the political left now.
Ratings will probably be lower next year, regardless if Black Window wins Best Picture
A big part of it is that people are getting rid of cable. I dropped cable in 2014, although I never sat through the Oscar show even when I did. A lot of live events have taken a hit over the years because of this.felipe wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2020 8:02 pm But why is it that after 85 years all this people would suddenly stop caring about the Oscars in 2015?
The Oscars, at least in the US are on ABC, which is available whether you have cable or not.Glowingwabbit wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2020 8:07 pmA big part of it is that people are getting rid of cable. I dropped cable in 2014, although I never sat through the Oscar show even when I did. A lot of live events have taken a hit over the years because of this.felipe wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2020 8:02 pm But why is it that after 85 years all this people would suddenly stop caring about the Oscars in 2015?
edit: what therewillbeblus said
Not always true. I have a basic Sling TV package - that's my only live tv. Gives me some news, some lifestyle and sports. ABC is not offered. I actually couldn't use my SLING subscription to watch it.Big Ben wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2020 8:09 pmThe Oscars, at least in the US are on ABC, which is available whether you have cable or not.Glowingwabbit wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2020 8:07 pmA big part of it is that people are getting rid of cable. I dropped cable in 2014, although I never sat through the Oscar show even when I did. A lot of live events have taken a hit over the years because of this.felipe wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2020 8:02 pm But why is it that after 85 years all this people would suddenly stop caring about the Oscars in 2015?
edit: what therewillbeblus said
I didn't know that. I thought all tvs in the US had ABC.Nasir007 wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2020 9:08 pm
Not always true. I have a basic Sling TV package - that's my only live tv. Gives me some news, some lifestyle and sports. ABC is not offered. I actually couldn't use my SLING subscription to watch it.
I actually thinks this hurts viewership too.
“I agree with Ms. McGowan that it is inaccurate to call me ‘brave’ for wearing a garment with women’s names on it. Brave is a term I more strongly associate with actions like those of the women who have been testifying against Harvey Weinstein the last few weeks, under incredible pressure.” Portman added that she has made short films, commercials, and music videos with female directors including “Marya Cohen, Mira Nair, Rebecca Zlotowski, Anna Rose Holmer, Sofia Coppola, Shirin Neshat and myself. Unfortunately, the unmade films I have tried to make are a ghost history,” adding that she has tried to use her position to help “get female directors hired on projects which they were then forced out of because of the conditions they faced at work.” Portman ended with a promise to “keep trying. While I have not yet been successful, I am hopeful that we are stepping into a new day.”
That’s nicely said, as I’ve definitely been in the “dumb award show” camp since the late 90s. I haven’t seen Parasite yet, but it was well on my list to see well before last weekend-but the exposure for world cinema is needed. Philly is losing one of its few theaters devoted to such films...DarkImbecile wrote: Mon Feb 10, 2020 5:08 pm This is why I push back on "the Oscars are meaningless and stupid" takes; literally millions more people will see Parasite now over the next several years, and some meaningful fraction of those will investigate Bong's other work and Korean/East Asian cinema as well.
Good night for cinema, as a result of a dumb awards show.
You should make sure to catch the moment when Bong recognized him while collecting his Best Director Oscar, leading to an impromptu standing ovation from the crowd; hopefully that made it worthwhile for Scorsese to attend. Probably the best Oscar moment since the La La Land/Moonlight debacle.bearcuborg wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2020 11:39 pm Speaking of Marty...I didn’t see the show, but online I caught his reaction to Eminem (who was terrific) and I just thought, “man, I’m so much younger than him-but just the thought of being in uncomfortable clothes, sitting for hours at this silly show-I would probably pass-even at my age, life is too short!”
Absolutely. When was the last time a nominee that didn't win got a standing ovation during the winner's acceptance speech?DarkImbecile wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2020 11:51 pmYou should make sure to catch the moment when Bong recognized him while collecting his Best Director Oscar, leading to an impromptu standing ovation from the crowd; hopefully that made it worthwhile for Scorsese to attend. Probably the best Oscar moment since the La La Land/Moonlight debacle.bearcuborg wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2020 11:39 pm Speaking of Marty...I didn’t see the show, but online I caught his reaction to Eminem (who was terrific) and I just thought, “man, I’m so much younger than him-but just the thought of being in uncomfortable clothes, sitting for hours at this silly show-I would probably pass-even at my age, life is too short!”
