Page 37 of 67
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 4:30 am
by bunuelian
And Zarathustra said to them: "I tell you, JM is DEAD!"
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 5:30 am
by Cinesimilitude
Gordon McMurphy wrote:Could you add a cigarette to her mouth? Uncle Hulot style, at an angle.
will a pipe do?
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 6:04 am
by justeleblanc
While we're at it you have to throw in the nipple tassles... and a kangaroo in the background.
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 12:04 pm
by Ishmael
And the source of that ray of light in the background should definitely be a Martian death machine.
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 4:14 pm
by hammock
Ishmael wrote:And the source of that ray of light in the background should definitely be a Martian death machine.
Like the ones from Mars Attacks? Oh,
I see where this cover is heading...
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 6:46 pm
by djali999
No need to be vulgar, now...
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 7:29 pm
by Theodore R. Stockton
Damn, you're really good at that.
Could you give her a tattoo of Woody Woodpecker smoking a cigar?
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 9:49 pm
by Anonymous
Just a heads up, they've added the Criterion logo to the front of the cover on the Criterion website.
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 11:10 pm
by Matt
ran222 wrote:Just a heads up, they've added the Criterion logo to the front of the cover on the Criterion website.
Welcome to
two pages ago, m'friend.
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 11:22 pm
by Anonymous
Whoops, my bad.
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 11:27 pm
by Cinesimilitude
justeleblanc wrote:While we're at it you have to throw in the nipple tassles... and a kangaroo in the background.
Ishmael wrote:And the source of that ray of light in the background should definitely be a Martian death machine.
Theodore R. Stockton wrote:Could you give her a tattoo of Woody Woodpecker smoking a cigar?
Happy?
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 11:30 pm
by arsonfilms
So um... what's everyone think of the new
Olivier's Shakespeare artwork? I'd link to the image, but it's flash, and I'm lazy, so...
I'm really pretty jazzed about the cover, truth be told, but I guess the real test will be how the rest of the box looks.
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 11:39 pm
by justeleblanc
I bet you designed the original Viridiana cover didn't you.
First, I want real looking tassles... the ones you got look like oil rigs and lollipops. I want these tassles turning -- I want to get a sense that this chick is doing a shimmy. Do I have to post a picture from The Graduate for you? Gees Louis.
Second, I think we need a hook and a chainsaw in place of her hands.
Third, the investors want the giraffe moved. Maybe to the left of her. They say the giraffe needs to be holding a gun and his member needs to be in a sock.
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 12:10 am
by jcelwin
SncDthMnky you should send it to Criterion. They might use it. It's an improvement, so they should.
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 1:15 am
by Cinesimilitude
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 1:28 am
by daniel p
So would everybody buy the DVD with that cover then? Strange looking giraffe
Please send it on to them... it's too funny... I, for one, don't actually mind the original cover tho...
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 2:55 am
by godardslave
thats the best dvd cover I have ever seen in my life!
its surrealism would make Bunuel proud!!
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 4:15 am
by justeleblanc
BRILLIANT!!!!!!!!!!!!! \:D/
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 6:17 am
by LightBulbFilm
It's missing one thing though... Well, two things. She needs to have bigger tits for the tassles, and there needs to be some guy form the 50s in the lower right hand corner wearing x-ray glasses looking through her dress with a word bubble that says "For fuck's sake... What else do you want on this damned cover?!"
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 6:40 am
by Jem
Give her an eye patch and I think we're done.
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 2:48 pm
by bjeggert82
Really, cause I think she needs a swastika somewhere--on an armband on her shoulder possibly?
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 4:38 pm
by Gordon
Brilliant! But I feel that the tits need to be exposed and the Swastika armband is a must.
And maybe Robert Crumb's head in the corner commenting on the deparavity.

Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 5:08 pm
by Derek Estes
I think you forgot to turn the A in Canterbury into a U.
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 5:37 pm
by bjeggert82
Gordon McMurphy wrote:Brilliant! But I feel that the tits need to be exposed and the Swastika armband is a must.
And maybe Robert Crumb's head in the corner commenting on the deparavity.

If we're going to expose her breasts, why not just put swastikas over the nipples and avoid the armband altogther...
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 6:13 pm
by Schkura
that'd just be silly