Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 4:08 pm
Page 37 of 98
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 11:04 pm
I've no idea what's going on in this image, but at least the stuffed bear does not seem to mind being molested.
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 9:08 pm
If your hero image is three hammy actors molesting a stuffed bear (let's face it, you could do worse), why on earth would you obscure the bear? To protect his identity?colinr0380 wrote:I've no idea what's going on in this image, but at least the stuffed bear does not seem to mind being molested.
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 9:05 pm
Perhaps the bear just had a better clause in his contract?
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 8:36 am
colinr0380 wrote:Perhaps the bear just had a better claws in his contract?
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 3:12 pm
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 5:40 pm
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 5:44 pm
When things get really tough in the film, Anne Heche ties the sweater over her shoulders and goes grocery shopping
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Thu Apr 01, 2010 3:30 am
A case where original poster art should not be used:
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Thu Apr 01, 2010 3:43 am
I'm trying to figure out what his expression says in that picture. "Can you believe it? I get home after a hard day's work, just wanting to sit by the fire, and I can't even get the dog to bring my slippers."Murdoch wrote:A case where original poster art should not be used:
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Thu Apr 01, 2010 3:56 pm
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 7:06 am
this post makes the baby jesus cry. oof.domino harvey wrote:Just think: This got a Blu-ray while Bright Star didn't
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 7:09 am
i take it this is the Girl With a Dragon Tattoo movie? who is the prick?Murdoch wrote:A case where original poster art should not be used:
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 4:49 pm
Seeing as how the gent on the right has his hand dangling (?) in his lap...
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 7:30 pm
HistoryProf wrote:who is the prick?
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:15 pm
When obnoxious branding and mystifyingly placed pull quotes attack!
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 11:57 pm
How did this get an 18 rating? 
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 12:07 am
Maybe the ratings board didn't like the scene of peasants pissing into the tractor's radiator.
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 3:16 am
There's been some talk on the Mr Bongo thread about the actual legitimacy of the BBFC certificates on their releases. Perhaps they've not actually resubmitted the film for DVD release (the only details on the BBFC's website are for a U certificate from a 1991 video release) and are just erring on the side of caution due to the original A for adult certificate given in the 1930s by giving it the highest possible rating. Plus, if I'm being cynical, maybe they hope it could cause some unwary purchasers to pick the film up blind in the hopes of some earthy 18-rated shenanigans (in the 2010 meaning of the certificate) occurring?
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 10:53 pm
Well there's the naked thrashing scenes - they'd probably still attract some kind of restrictive rating, though 18 does seem rather extreme.
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:16 am
The 18 rating is not official, it's just Mr Bongo erring on the side of caution, as they don't seem to bother getting their films classified by the BBFC. According to the BBFC website, the only film Mr Bongo have submitted was their first release Soy Cubazedz wrote:Well there's the naked thrashing scenes - they'd probably still attract some kind of restrictive rating, though 18 does seem rather extreme.
I can only assume that the cost of getting this first release classified led them to taking a gamble on not classifying subsequent releases.
They're taking a huge gamble if they are indeed releasing films without first submitting them to the BBFC. If anyone finds out, they will have to withdraw all their releases and get them submitted.
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 8:17 am
Maybe it's because the film contains graphic scenes depicting a spectre haunting Europe?domino harvey wrote:How did this get an 18 rating?
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2010 7:26 pm
I am apparently not high enough to appreciate this cover:
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2010 7:33 pm
This orange and teal thing is an epidemic.
Re: Worst DVD Covers...ever! (Part 3-D)
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2010 4:49 am
