kcota17 wrote:How does everyone feel about
the reveal of Judy being "jow-day"? I was pretty disappointed by that. It seemed like a quick and lazy reveal. That and the green glove / BOB orb were the only disappointments to me.
It was ridiculously stupid. The tacky visual effects, convoluted coincidences and general absurdity of the resolution of the 'plot' I feel are very intentional.
It doesn't absolve the show of how difficult it is to watch such jarringly bad material, but I think overall it was worth it for that superimposed image of Dale Cooper, watching that easy sci-fi TV ending that culminates in the weird punch successfully having beaten evil into submission, with that look of utter confusion. Because this isn't the answer. It never was.
I think the new Twin Peaks reflects how Lynch has matured since the original show. He's always been about expressing huge, inexplicable evils, but he's shifted in what he portrays as the source of that evil. '90 Twin Peaks expressed the ideology running through the works of that period (Blue Velvet, Wild at Heart): evil is an exterior force, the scary thing that intrudes upon our comfortable lives that we have to fight against (in original Twin Peaks, Bob).
The original Twin Peaks finale swiftly and bluntly dismissed Wyndham Earle, after weeks of cliffhangers about him, as a way of acknowledging that the show was never really about that, it was about 'Bob', 'the evil that men do'.
This new show just as bluntly dismisses many episodes of build up and plot contrivance about fighting Bob. Cooper's confused stare now bears witness. Why doesn't it feel right? The good guys have united, evil's been put in its place. Isn't this it?
This new finale updates Twin Peaks in line with the conception of evil (and sorrow) that we've seen in Lynch's work since the original: evil isn't an external force. It comes from within.
The same impulse of wishing to do good and fight 'evil' in all its forms that makes Cooper so powerful as a hero also dooms him. Too comforted by awareness of his moral superiority, he's always been too sure of himself. Just like when he arrested Ben Horne instead of Leland. Just like when he wandered into the Black Lodge at the end of season 2. This new finale reflects on both those moments a really profound way.
The Cooper that always tries to assert his will, work everything out, vanquish evil once and for all will always fail. We live in a world of profound, unanswerable pain. There's no solution to the great mystery of why we suffer.
Exiting the Black Lodge with a plan to outsmart Bob, the force that could take Laura Palmer from this earth, was just as foolish as entering it with the hope to overcome the mystery of evil through sheer force of will 25 years ago.
So we go back to the image of Cooper's great confusion over the red curtains, just as we saw after Maddy's death. He was so sure! And yet, evil persists. The world spins.
Cooper is too steely and determined to see good triumph over the odds that he couldn't do as Bobby and Donna did on that night: feel the pain and finality of loss. Grieve. And then move forward.
Episode 17 and 18 ended in the same way: Cooper tries to save Laura, but he can't. He couldn't then, he can't 25 years later. Episode 18 goes deeper into the tragedy of his inability to stare inexplicable pain in the face. To feel grief in a healthy way.
The Dougie Jones that we see in episode 18 is a Cooper no longer doomed by his fatal flaw. A Cooper that can accept the mystery of life. Move forward from grief, and enjoy the love of those close to him.
The other Cooper shows us the end result of being consumed by his need to question, to 'solve'. He can't enjoy what he has - the love of Diane. Endless questioning has not made him happy. It's caused his relationships to deteriorate - that's what I see the sex scene as expressing. He's so obsessed with trying to solve something that can never be solved that he has lost sight of what initially was driving him. He is changing into someone else before Diane's eyes, as she lays her hands over his face while she tries to get closer to him.
If we can't just be, like Carl Rodd, who still gazes on the trees with joy, or like Jacobi or Jerry, having fun their way, no matter what society makes of them, what's the use in living? What's the use of being so utterly brought down by all the external bullshit, all the grief and sorrow, if we are one of those privileged enough to have the option to be free of them?
What was Agent Cooper thinking? He was missing the forest through the trees.
This show seems massively, massively influenced by Lynch's mediation. It's all about acceptance and letting go.
Anyway, thanks to anyone reading these scrambled thoughts written after a night of no sleep, haunted by what I just witnessed. This finale was some of the most perfect filmmaking I've witnessed since, oh...Inland Empire.
oldsheperd wrote:Anyone figure out why Carrie Paige
had a dead guy and an assault rifle in her house. Also, when Cooper told her he was FBI I believe she asked, "Have you found him?"
Or is this typical Lynchian "here's something unusual that has nothing to do with anything."
I see it as abstractions to illustrate the fucked up headspace of a victim of abuse - an affirmation of the lasting impact of raw horror on the level of a man raping and murdering his daughter. And I see Laura's final scream as both the scream of a woman who's life is coming apart at the seams realising she's trapped in a nightmare scenario, and of Laura realising that this is it. The resolution is never coming. She will always be dead.
I see the Sarah Palmer material in the same way: horror movie abstractions to portray what's left in her life after a trauma of the like she was witness to. Pure hatred for herself and for Laura. The frightening absurdity of irresolvable grief.
Finch wrote:Not sure how I feel about them retconning FWWM and the original first season. Part 18 on the other hand I thought was very good. I knew we were headed for another cliffhanger with 15 minutes to go.
...
I think Mssrs Lynch and Frost have gambled a bit too openly on there being a fourth season.
I really don't think it's a cliffhanger at all. It's, at least on an emotional level, a definitive closure to the world of Twin Peaks in the way that the original finale isn't. Yes, mysteries are left open, like Audrey, but they're there to provoke questions, not because it's an unfinished story, as it was 25 years ago
Finch wrote:
Given the retconning that takes place in part 17, if they don't get the opportunity to address this in another season or even a feature film, they risk stripping the first season AND FWWM of a lot of their power.
I don't think it's really a retcon. Laura always died. That's the final message. She's dead. And yet, she 'lives' (or at least, the hollow shell of her, Cooper's conception of her) because she's still alive to him, as long as he refuses to let go.
Her soul still went through the voyage it did in Fire Walk With Me. That was the end of her story. This is the end of Cooper's story: a descent into myriad hallways and parallel 'what-if' possibilities that culminates in the same essential truth: Fire Walk With Me happened, Laura is gone.
Finch wrote:And what was Laura whispering into Cooper's ear that made him so shocked in Part 2 (repeated here again)?
That she is dead, and that he can't stop that. I think it being so much of a rhyme to the moment when we last saw Cooper utterly confused is the key to it all. He'll never solve the case. He even brings back the song that reminds us of that feeling. It is happening again, and again, and again and again, as long as he won't let go.