criterionforum.org

Some excerpts from the film.

I'm sure this will only appeal to a handful of people but I have to say I'm pretty excited about this. Korine seems to have largely dispensed with narrative altogether, which in his case seems wise - his films work for me as an accumulation of moments, visions, moods, or in Herzogian terms, ecstatic truths. The way the camera's auto-iris is used in conjunction with a lamp in the basement excerpt is quite beautiful in its own way. Anyway, this movie looks to be total fish in a barrel for anyone not inclined towards Korine's work, but that's always been the case, and one of the most admirable things about his films in my opinion.

It seems like this is going to be a little bit like Julien Donkey-Boy in the sense that it's another "quick film" from Korine. I kind of feel like he's just trying to appease the people that thought Mister Lonely wasn't "Korine enough" or something. His next film is suppose to be a lot bigger and a lot more personal. I just hope it doesn't take him 8 years to make it.

I'd still love to see this, though.

sidehacker wrote:It seems like this is going to be a little bit like Julien Donkey-Boy in the sense that it's another "quick film" from Korine. I kind of feel like he's just trying to appease the people that thought Mister Lonely wasn't "Korine enough" or something. His next film is suppose to be a lot bigger and a lot more personal. I just hope it doesn't take him 8 years to make it.

I'd still love to see this, though.

Well, I think julien donkey-boy may be his most accomplished movie, but whether it's his best, I'm not quite sure; I've liked them all. I read somewhere that he'd be working on something else by the end of this year.

Donkey-Boy succeeds. This doesn't seem to.

Tark wrote:Donkey-Boy succeeds. This doesn't seem to.

From #4 of the Forum Rules: "if you don't like a film (or whatever the topic under discussion is), no one really needs you to comment on that fact and disappear. If you must post your disapproval in a thread, at least back it up with some reasoning."

Mr_sausage wrote:

Tark wrote:Donkey-Boy succeeds. This doesn't seem to.

From #4 of the Forum Rules: "if you don't like a film (or whatever the topic under discussion is), no one really needs you to comment on that fact and disappear. If you must post your disapproval in a thread, at least back it up with some reasoning."

Come on dude.

That comment reveals a lot of my feelings. I think a semi-non-narrative film by a director, succeeds. A film that features grainy film and quirky characters.

Based on film clips, I think a new film by the same director, with quirky characters, grainy video, and apparently no narrative, doesn't seem to succeed.

Would you like to know anything else? Please ask.

Tark wrote:

Mr_sausage wrote:

Tark wrote:Donkey-Boy succeeds. This doesn't seem to.

From #4 of the Forum Rules: "if you don't like a film (or whatever the topic under discussion is), no one really needs you to comment on that fact and disappear. If you must post your disapproval in a thread, at least back it up with some reasoning."

Come on dude.

That comment reveals a lot of my feelings. I think a semi-non-narrative film by a director, succeeds. A film that features grainy film and quirky characters.

Based on film clips, I think a new film by the same director, with quirky characters, grainy video, and apparently no narrative, doesn't seem to succeed.

Would you like to know anything else? Please ask.

What exactly do you find unclear about "back it up with some reasoning"? You've been on this forum long enough, you should know we don't accept members coming in, posting one-line dismissive comments about movies, and then leaving without so much as an explanation.

I'd like to say more but I've already overstepped by commenting on a film that I've only seen 2 minutes of.

It was a hunch.

Mr_sausage wrote:

Tark wrote:

Mr_sausage wrote: From #4 of the Forum Rules: "if you don't like a film (or whatever the topic under discussion is), no one really needs you to comment on that fact and disappear. If you must post your disapproval in a thread, at least back it up with some reasoning."

Come on dude.

That comment reveals a lot of my feelings. I think a semi-non-narrative film by a director, succeeds. A film that features grainy film and quirky characters.

Based on film clips, I think a new film by the same director, with quirky characters, grainy video, and apparently no narrative, doesn't seem to succeed.

Would you like to know anything else? Please ask.

What exactly do you find unclear about "back it up with some reasoning"? You've been on this forum long enough, you should know we don't accept members coming in, posting one-line dismissive comments about movies, and then leaving without so much as an explanation.

Um, is that not the specialty of the board member with the Theresa Russell icon/fetish? Check out any one of his posts. Anyway, Sausage is right here; not only is Tark's comment silly and pointless (the guy didn't even see the movie he claims to dislike) his defensive response only served to dig his grave deeper. This exposes both jackasses, plain and simple.

Hopefully I'll be able to get rush tickets for this at the NYFF. http://ticketing.filmlinc.com/single/Ev ... aspx?p=212" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

This May, trash will be humped.

Markson wrote:Trailer.

Huh? About five months late there, dude.

Is there a way we could just lock Harmony Korine in a closet and never let him out?

I can think of better candidates that get far more money, attention and respect.

Oh, I know. But it would still make me really happy.

mfunk9786 wrote:Is there a way we could just lock Harmony Korine in a closet and never let him out?

I see Closet Lockers has just been added to his in-production page on IMDB

This film is funny for about twenty minutes and after that it's a case of severely diminishing returns. More like a series of YouTube stunts played end-on-end rather than a film - even an unstructured, non-narrative one.

Even with its desperately low-fi, guerrilla aesthetic, there were plenty of crew to credit at the end. Though maybe that was a conceptual joke (if it wasn't, it should've been).

James wrote:

Markson wrote:Trailer.

Huh? About five months late there, dude.

Sorry––it was new to me and I didn't see it linked anywhere on this page.

zedz wrote:This film is funny for about twenty minutes and after that it's a case of severely diminishing returns. More like a series of YouTube stunts played end-on-end rather than a film - even an unstructured, non-narrative one.

Even with its desperately low-fi, guerrilla aesthetic, there were plenty of crew to credit at the end. Though maybe that was a conceptual joke (if it wasn't, it should've been).

28 people walked out of the recent screening at the Era New Horizons festival in Wrocław - my spy in the auditorium tells me that they initially sneaked out quietly, but gradually made more and more of a show of Walking Out so that it became a grandiose statement. (The cinema didn't have bangable seats though, like Cannes).

When I saw it I was amazed to see that absolutely nobody walked out. Though a lot of people walked in late (like, 30 or 40 minutes late) and chuckled along as they got the joke that many minutes after the rest of the viewers had. I suspect the majority of the audience were there to be seen to be cool, and they were kept in their seats by the artificial gravity of their own hipness, but I missed the diversion of the huffing departures.

zedz wrote:When I saw it I was amazed to see that absolutely nobody walked out. Though a lot of people walked in late (like, 30 or 40 minutes late) and chuckled along as they got the joke that many minutes after the rest of the viewers had. I suspect the majority of the audience were there to be seen to be cool, and they were kept in their seats by the artificial gravity of their own hipness, but I missed the diversion of the huffing departures.

That or they knew it was only 70 minutes. Either way, I don't really see what's not to like here if the viewer is attune to experimental narrative cinema - it's ambitious and very creative in its dream symbol structuralism.

Act da Fool, a new short film by Korine. Love it - sort of Gummo meets Days of Heaven, by way of The Aluminum Fowl and George Washington.

While I'm here, Trash Humpers is out on DVD in the U.S. on September 21. Warp Films is handling the UK release and have a very cool looking special VHS edition available that's been personalized by Korine. You can also buy a 35mm print!

Oedipax wrote:You can also buy a 35mm print!

Now that is a conceptual joke!

Hopefully the rest of the world will follow their lead!