Page 1 of 2

Never Let Me Go (Mark Romanek, 2010)

Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:02 pm
by Jeff
Here is the trailer for Mark Romanek's Never Let Me Go. It is due for U.S. release on October 1.

The studio's synopsis:
In his highly acclaimed novel NEVER LET ME GO, Kazuo Ishiguro (THE REMAINS OF THE DAY) created a remarkable story of love, loss and hidden truths. In it he posed the fundamental question: What makes us human? Now director Mark Romanek (ONE HOUR PHOTO), writer Alex Garland and DNA Films bring Ishiguro's hauntingly poignant and emotional story to the screen. Kathy (Oscar® nominee Carey Mulligan, AN EDUCATION), Tommy (Andrew Garfield, BOY A, RED RIDING) and Ruth (Oscar® nominee Keira Knightley, PRIDE & PREJUDICE, ATONEMENT) live in a world and a time that feel familiar to us, but are not quite like anything we know. They spend their childhood at Hailsham, a seemingly idyllic English boarding school. When they leave the shelter of the school and the terrible truth of their fate is revealed to them, they must also confront the deep feelings of love, jealousy and betrayal that threaten to pull them apart.

Re: Trailers for Upcoming Films

Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 2:34 am
by domino harvey
This has Oscar written all over it

Re: Trailers for Upcoming Films

Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 4:14 am
by Jeff
domino harvey wrote:This has Oscar written all over it
Maybe. The cast and the literary pedigree certainly scream Oscar, but I wonder if the Academy can get past their aversion to the sci-fi aspects. That's usually not their thing (giant, blue CGI people notwithstanding). I've been anxiously awaiting Romanek's followup to the rather disappointing One Hour Photo. His music videos (especially Brooding Fiona Apple Writhes in Her Underwear) suggest so much more potential. I suspect the script will be better this time around.

Re: Never Let Me Go (Mark Romanek, 2010)

Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 5:42 am
by mfunk9786
Am I alone in really liking One Hour Photo? I don't recall finding much to dislike about the script, and Robin Williams and Gary Cole gave great performances.

Re: Never Let Me Go (Mark Romanek, 2010)

Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 6:06 am
by knives
Outside of the copout with Williams psychosis I'm right there with you. Fantastic atmosphere, humour, and performances. That dream sequence makes me reach for the ceiling every time.

Re: Never Let Me Go (Mark Romanek, 2010)

Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 12:53 pm
by dadaistnun
That looks a lot better than I expected. I loved the novel and feared the sci-fi aspects of it might overwhelm the emotional ones, but that doesn't seem to be the case (even though the sci-fi elements looks to be a more explicit here). I'll probably find any adaptation at least a little wanting, but the only things that really don't sit well with me in the preview could probably be chalked up to traileritis. Visually it largely looks like what I envisioned while reading it, and while this would have been a perfect opportunity to showcase some new, unknown actors in the lead roles, it looks to be well cast. Even Keira Knightly looks perfect in her role (though I admit I'm softening on her now that Cronenberg has cast her in that Freud/Jung film he's doing).
Spoiler
The first shot in the trailer, of Mulligan at the fence with plastic bags caught in it, is the last scene in the novel and looks nearly perfect. It really reminds me of how overwhelmingly sad the novel is; I kept reading that last paragraph or two over & over when I finished the book.

Re: Never Let Me Go (Mark Romanek, 2010)

Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 1:27 pm
by mfunk9786
knives wrote:Outside of the copout with Williams psychosis I'm right there with you. Fantastic atmosphere, humour, and performances. That dream sequence makes me reach for the ceiling every time.
+1. I'd forgotten about that dream sequence. *shudder*

I agree with you about the psychosis, but the monologue at the end is quite well-done nonetheless.

Re: Never Let Me Go (Mark Romanek, 2010)

Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 1:41 pm
by Zazou dans le Metro
Call me Captain poo-poo if you will but doesn't this all smack a bit of Merchant Ivoryworld. The literary style adaptation- earnest acting , over art-directed period detail- ooh get those tweeds and knitwear?

Re: Never Let Me Go (Mark Romanek, 2010)

Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 3:22 pm
by Jeff
mfunk9786 wrote:Am I alone in really liking One Hour Photo?
Not at all. I suspect I'm in the minority in disliking it. I just recall it rubbing me the wrong way and feeling that it was very phony, self-satisfied, and pat. To be fair, I haven't seen it since my single theatrical screening in 2002, so I probably need to take another look. My biggest issue was indeed with the end reveal regarding the supposed reasons behind Williams' psychosis. It seemed unnecessary, arbitrary, and cliched (Psycho, of course, notoriously suffers from the same problem). I'm reminded of Chris Rock's lament, "What ever happened to crazy?" I also didn't like the voiceover monologues, and felt like Romanek played every note with a sledgehammer. We get it, he's lonely and disaffected. The hyper-stylized set design to emphasize the soullessness of suburban America was a bit over the top for me too. Wal-Mart is many things, but "minimalist" isn't one of them. I'm allergic to Robin Williams, which doesn't help either.

My comment about the script being better this time refers largely to the fact that Romanek wrote One Hour Photo himself, and this time he's got a respected novel adapted by a talented screenwriter. I like Romanek a lot though, and I think that when he is concerned only with telling a story through striking, well-composed visuals, he will fare much better.

Re: Never Let Me Go (Mark Romanek, 2010)

Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 7:50 pm
by Murdoch
Loved the novel, and this looks like it captured it perfectly. Judging from the trailer it seems that the film won't shift too much toward the sci-fi aspect and will keep the focus on the characters, which is a good thing since the film
Spoiler
then can hopefully maintain the underlying dread that pervaded the book without spelling the clones/duplicates aspect out too explicitly.
Can't wait.

Re: Never Let Me Go (Mark Romanek, 2010)

Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 8:24 pm
by Matt
Zazou dans le Metro wrote:Call me Captain poo-poo if you will but doesn't this all smack a bit of Merchant Ivoryworld. The literary style adaptation- earnest acting , over art-directed period detail- ooh get those tweeds and knitwear?
I think, knowing what I know of the book, that it's a pretty clever ruse to lay out a very beautiful rug for viewers to admire which then gets pulled out from under them. It drops hints to the true nature of the story, though, through the repeated use of the word "donation" and the beeping checkpoints.

Re: Never Let Me Go (Mark Romanek, 2010)

Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 8:37 pm
by Zazou dans le Metro
Matt wrote:
Zazou dans le Metro wrote:Call me Captain poo-poo if you will but doesn't this all smack a bit of Merchant Ivoryworld. The literary style adaptation- earnest acting , over art-directed period detail- ooh get those tweeds and knitwear?
I think, knowing what I know of the book, that it's a pretty clever ruse to lay out a very beautiful rug for viewers to admire which then gets pulled out from under them. It drops hints to the true nature of the story, though, through the repeated use of the word "donation" and the beeping checkpoints.
I do hope you're right and that it is that old ailment traileritis that is more to blame. Strange thing is that I used to work alongside Mark Romanek in the early 90's doing music vids out of the same company. At the time he was into very low rent slacker type stuff with people like Robyn Hitchcock where the only art department requirement would be a plastic bag full of carrots. (Similarly his first feature Static is great quirky fun). Then he disappeared for a while and popped up in LA doing Janet Jackson videos. Fuck knows what happened ,maybe he got cloned.

Re: Never Let Me Go (Mark Romanek, 2010)

Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 9:11 pm
by domino harvey
Zazou dans le Metro wrote:Call me Captain poo-poo if you will but doesn't this all smack a bit of Merchant Ivoryworld.
To be fair, its source is from the same author as the Remains of the Day...

Re: Never Let Me Go (Mark Romanek, 2010)

Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 9:19 pm
by Sloper
Horrible case of traileritis, I think; very reminiscent of that spoof 'every Oscar-winning film' trailer that's been doing the rounds. But from what you see of the film here, it seems promising. Nice subdued look. The real danger here would be if it overplayed the sentiment of the story, turning it into the kind of melodramatic oscar-chaser the trailer makes it out to be. Like The Remains of the Day, the story has to be told with maximum restraint in order to achieve its emotional impact, and that's especially true with a narrative as profoundly strange as this one is. Merchant Ivory were perfect for that earlier adaptation, precisely because they do distance and alienation so well.

I'm a big Ishiguro fan - he's really the only living writer whose work I keep up with religiously - and did like this novel a lot. It seemed very 'accessible' after The Unconsoled and When We Were Orphans, both of which are completely unfilmable, and I did wonder whether he might be deliberately tailoring the book as a movie-friendly Keira-vehicle. It'll be really interesting to see whether it works out.

Has anyone read his latest, Nocturnes? I enjoyed it a lot, all the more so because it's so incredibly slight. But it does feel a bit like he's still exploring the same old ground, using the same old techniques, without really trying to stretch himself, and he's said as much in interviews. It was nice, though, to see him successfully developing his humorous side; some of the stories really are laugh-out-loud funny. There's a bit of this in his earlier work too (especially The Unconsoled) but he seems to be working in a much lighter vein now, and I wonder if he'll carry on mellowing with age...

Re: Never Let Me Go (Mark Romanek, 2010)

Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 2:13 am
by bdsweeney
Zazou dans le Metro wrote:Call me Captain poo-poo if you will but doesn't this all smack a bit of Merchant Ivoryworld. The literary style adaptation- earnest acting , over art-directed period detail- ooh get those tweeds and knitwear?
Possibly ... but I can't imagine anything too 'comfortable' from the likes of Alex Garland.

Also, I agree with Sloper reguarding the story needing maximum restraint. I only hope they let the film follow the story to its logical conclusion.

The book had me bawling my eyes out ... :oops:

Re: Never Let Me Go (Mark Romanek, 2010)

Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 5:00 pm
by rs98762001
The film is actually very restrained. Romanek only falters and gives into sentiment with his choice of slightly overbearing score and in one big Oscar-baiting moment from Garfield (which stuck out even in the trailer). Otherwise this quietly builds power and impact. It reminded me a little of the Campion of BRIGHT STAR, but for me this had greater emotional force. Wonderful performances. Overall, a big step up from One Hour Photo.

Re: Never Let Me Go (Mark Romanek, 2010)

Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 10:32 pm
by Kellen
Some reviews starting to trickle down:
The first big salvo in the Telluride reviews has come from MCN's David Poland who calls Romanek's film a "masterpiece." And adds glowingly, "[it's] a film we’ll be discussing, frame by frame, in schools, 20 years from now. I can only hope that this doesn’t mean it will be underappreciated now. This film feels like the product of Kubrick and Malick’s bastard son."

Variety is in the tank for the picture as well. "“Never Let Me Go is that rare find, a fragile little four-leaf clover of a movie that’s emotionally devastating, yet all too easily trampled by cynics. his gift for texture and tone shines through. Once again, the helmer seems drawn to the melancholy side of his material, directing the cast, especially Mulligan, to play everything as if teetering on the brink of a complete emotional breakdown."

Anne Thompson says: Romanek has "created a believably off-kilter ‘what-if’ world that is vaguely familiar but not exactly what once was,” praising the trio of actors as a “heartbreaking love triangle,” cautions audiences that she "cried buckets at this film" and adds" get out your handkerchiefs."

THR has mixed thoughts calling it, "a very engaging, if somber, story that has a surfeit of elegant elements that didn't quite add up to a great film as a whole. Mulligan, who trekked to Telluride for the first time last year with "An Education," is equally magnetic in a role that asks her to be silent and/or sad much of the time. Despite the restrained nature of her performance, she shows once again that she is a uniquely expressive and radiant film presence. Garfield, who is about to make a big shift into the mainstream "Spider-Man" universe for Sony, is also very good in playing an odd, somewhat dim but still heartbreaking character."

InContention is not quite moved, but they, much like everyone else, seem to think composer Rachel Portman is a shoo-in for an Oscar nomination which is nice to hear considering we've already heard the score and think it's great. "There is a distance here, a cold sense of removal from what would otherwise be an extremely moving narrative. I wanted desperately to feel for the characters and their plight (I won’t hazard particulars for fear of spoilers). But I felt nothing…at all."

Hitfix seems to thing the film is saddled with too much lugubriousness upfront. "What is most disappointing about the film is that the picture's tone is so sad and morose it hinders any real connection for the characters. You want them to have one moment of joy, one minute of happiness in their days waiting for their eventual fate (and there are told to be many), but it never happens (or is reduced to forced laughter at an American TV sitcom)."

Even genre guys like Firstshowing and /Film who seemingly could have been turned off by the lack of sci-fi elements in the film are giving it their thumbs up.

Re: Never Let Me Go (Mark Romanek, 2010)

Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 2:56 am
by mfunk9786
Usually when a critic admits that a film is "easily trampled by cynics," it doesn't bode well. I have a feeling that Variety might end up being in the minority on this one, and that little one-off comment sort of gives that away. I admire Romanek's work though, and as Merchant Ivory-ish as this looks (zzzzzz), I'm still looking forward to it.

Re: Never Let Me Go (Mark Romanek, 2010)

Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 5:06 pm
by rs98762001
Perceptive review from Andrew O'Hehir. Pretty accurately reflects this film's many strengths.

Re: Never Let Me Go (Mark Romanek, 2010)

Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 7:02 pm
by oldsheperd
Good to see Romanek again just for the simple idea that if this film does well then perhaps Static will finally get a dvd release. Maybe Criterion with a cover that shows all the irregular jesus crucifixes

Re: Never Let Me Go (Mark Romanek, 2010)

Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 2:58 pm
by Finch
Ed Gonzalez' review at Slant (2 out of 4)

Re: Never Let Me Go (Mark Romanek, 2010)

Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:41 pm
by Murdoch
Sounds like his dislike for the film stems largely from dislike for the book, even the negative reviews have me looking forward to this.

Re: Never Let Me Go (Mark Romanek, 2010)

Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 5:16 pm
by Kellen
I can't make it because of school but if anyone else here is interested Mark just posted this on twitter:

"Carey Mulligan & I will be at the NY Apple Store (Soho) tomorrow (Weds) @ 6pm for a Q&A w/Elvis Mitchell. Please come."

Re: Never Let Me Go (Mark Romanek, 2010)

Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2010 1:07 pm
by dadaistnun
Manohla Dargis is back from vacation/sabbatical/wherever.

Re: Never Let Me Go (Mark Romanek, 2010)

Posted: Fri Sep 17, 2010 11:29 pm
by Kellen
I checked out the film last night. Carey Mulligan introduced it(she said like 2 things then left.) The film has some really beautiful shots in it. I liked Andrew Garfield and Carey Mulligan's performances. Keira Knightley I didn't care for all that much, I just felt her co-stars did a much better job. The film seems a little bit uneven at times, I still did enjoy it though. It would be worth the watch just for the visuals/some of the shots of landscapes. I was surprised by a couple of scenes that made myself and the audience laugh out loud. Oh and the scene from the trailer were Garfield is screaming in the middle of the road still was pretty cheesy.