Page 1 of 1
Hobo With A Shotgun (Jason Eisener, 2011)
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 12:29 pm
by CSM126
Re: Hobo With A Shotgun (Jason Eisener, 2011)
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 3:24 pm
by Kellen
Looks super crazy and fun. Pretty cool to see Rutger Hauer as the hobo.
Re: Hobo With A Shotgun (Jason Eisener, 2011)
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 3:29 pm
by Alphonse Doinel
Porky's may have some competition for the highest grossing Canadian film.
Re: Hobo With A Shotgun (Jason Eisener, 2011)
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 3:39 pm
by prokosch
This looks way, WAY better than I thought it would. Dartmouth International Films FTW.
Re: Hobo With A Shotgun (Jason Eisener, 2011)
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 4:40 pm
by knives
Alphonse Doinel wrote:Porky's may have some competition for the highest grossing Canadian film.
Does Porky's still have that title? Also I guess this solidifies that we're moving away from the '80s back to the '70s. Though this looks gloriously stupid and fun which is usually a good thing. Have to love the bluntness of the title.
Re: Hobo With A Shotgun (Jason Eisener, 2011)
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:07 pm
by Murdoch
I remember when the viral was making the rounds, can't believe they made a feature. Some things are best left alone (unless this was the plan all along).
Re: Hobo With A Shotgun (Jason Eisener, 2011)
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:14 pm
by domino harvey
Tom Hagen wrote:Thread worthy?
It looks better than at least 75% of the movies that get a thread in the New Films subforum
Re: Hobo With A Shotgun (Jason Eisener, 2011)
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:19 pm
by Tom Hagen
Thread worthy?
Re: Hobo With A Shotgun (Jason Eisener, 2011)
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:55 pm
by Grand Wazoo
Looks like a hell of a lot of fun, but what's with the Batman and Robin color scheme?
Re: Hobo With A Shotgun (Jason Eisener, 2011)
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 6:29 pm
by Murdoch
Holy shit, domino can quote posts before they even happen
Re: Hobo With A Shotgun (Jason Eisener, 2011)
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 7:46 pm
by Alphonse Doinel
knives wrote:Does Porky's still have that title?.
It does. At least if you take inflation into account.
Re: Hobo With A Shotgun (Jason Eisener, 2011)
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 8:36 pm
by willoneill
I think Bon Cop Bad Cop managed to overtake Porkys as Canada's "Avatar". At least I read that somewhere.
Re: Hobo With A Shotgun (Jason Eisener, 2011)
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 8:41 pm
by Ovader
Some extras are fellow members from the same Film Co-op I am part of so it should be interesting to see if they survived the final cut.
Re: Hobo With A Shotgun (Jason Eisener, 2011)
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 10:34 pm
by Alphonse Doinel
willoneill wrote:I think Bon Cop Bad Cop managed to overtake Porkys as Canada's "Avatar". At least I read that somewhere.
It did overtake it, but with inflation, it didn't come close to Porky's.
The sad thing is, Bon Cop barely made anything outside Quebec. Canadian films really do
that bad.
Re: Hobo With A Shotgun (Jason Eisener, 2011)
Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 1:50 pm
by prokosch
Murdoch wrote:Some things are best left alone (unless this was the plan all along).
This was the plan all along, although probably became more of a "plan"
plan once established producers and then Rutger Hauer got involved.
Re: Hobo With A Shotgun (Jason Eisener, 2011)
Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 1:55 pm
by prokosch
Alphonse Doinel wrote:Canadian films really do that bad.
Unless you're
this and rack up $11 million in one province in one summer. English-Canadian films generally do wretched business while big French-Canadian films generally become zeitgeist-y smashes in Québec, and the rest of the country never hears of them. For purposes of comparison, "Trailer Park Boys: Countdown to Liquor Day," the highest-grossing English-language Canadian film of 2009, pulled in just north of CDN$2.8 million nation-wide.
Re: Hobo With A Shotgun (Jason Eisener, 2011)
Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 4:14 pm
by Mr Sausage
You also have to realize that, for its size, Canada does not have a huge population. As of 2010 there are 34,160,000 people living in Canada. Compare that to the 309,162,581 living this year in the United States. Add to that the somewhat diffuse nature of the population spread and the fact that the large population of Quebec probably isn't much concerned with English language Canadian films, and there just isn't that much money being spent.