The Worricker Trilogy (David Hare, 2011-2014)
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2014 10:59 pm
This is my previous post on the first film in the trilogy, Page Eight, from July 2011:
The BBC screened this film last night, but it has also been doing the rounds of festivals too (here is the trailer from the Toronto Film Festival), so deserves a thread of its own. The first film directed by David Hare since 1997's The Designated Mourner, it was a very enjoyable return to the 'tension packed conversations in nondescript government offices and conference rooms, classy restauarants, sumptuous apartments and country homes and in the private chambers of the Prime Ministers' style of spy thrillers after the rather over the top shenanigans of the Bourne/Spooks action thrillers. (It also I guess works as a good palate cleanser in preparation for the forthcoming remake of Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy)
I am not exactly sure how it will go down in the US as the plot revolves around a source revealing the exact locations of secret US torture sites around the world with the titular page eight being the off hand remark in the file that reveals that the British Prime Minister knew of these actions and colluded with the US in deceiving the British public. Throw in the subplot involving Rachel Weisz as a daughter of a Middle Eastern activist who is looking for justice for her brother killled by the IDF while protesting the demolition of houses in the West Bank during the building of the security wall, a plot which feels as if it combines the current issues involving the Wall with the issues surrounding the protracted inquiry into the death of Tom Hurndall in 2003 (or perhaps even more pertinently, Rachel Corrie), and it might make uncomfortable viewing for some.
The other major 2003 issue that seems to get folded into the drama is the death of David Kelly since Michael Gambon's character as the head of the security agency, after passing over the dossier then suffers a suspiciously fatal heart attack at his home (I am worried that Gambon may be in that stage of his career where the roles may be trying to tell him something - either having him die here, get bumped off in The Good Shepherd, or have an incapacitating illness in The Life Aquatic! Not the most comforting kinds of roles to be offered on a regular basis!) The idea of extra-judicial killing hangs heavily throughout the film, as Bill Nighy's character then goes on the run, although this idea is kept somewhat in the background of the events. This does however lead to the marvellously tense conversation with Ralph Fiennes' deeply sinister PM when he demands the incriminating dossier back from Nighy.
I could see how some of the more mannered or oblique spy conversations could become frustrating, though there is a really nice payoff in the one scene between Nighy and Saskia Reeves talking about trust (which acts as a counterpoint to an earlier scene in which Nighy is outlining the dossier for the spiky government minister), that really mitigated that approach for me. Especially as, despite all the heavyhanded political stuff outlined above, the theme of the film feels more about trust between individual people and whether unconditional trust in another person is still at all possible.
Nighy is very good in a role that, like Matt Damon's part in The Good Shepherd, requires a certain monotonous tone to it. However he does add some nice flashes of a buried humourous personality early on (I hate those darn pass code door locks too, and always seem to be the last one informed when someone has changed the codes on them!) and has a really touching scene later in the meeting with his daughter (with a great joke about 'conceptual' artists!)
One of the great strengths of this film has to be the cast. In addition to the above I have to single out Judy Davis, who is magnificent as Nighy's sort-of nemesis in the intelligence department. There also seems to be, in the late in the film revelation about her using her son to get close to Nighy's daughter, a sly dig at the recent governmental scandal of ministers employing their relatives!
The BBC screened this film last night, but it has also been doing the rounds of festivals too (here is the trailer from the Toronto Film Festival), so deserves a thread of its own. The first film directed by David Hare since 1997's The Designated Mourner, it was a very enjoyable return to the 'tension packed conversations in nondescript government offices and conference rooms, classy restauarants, sumptuous apartments and country homes and in the private chambers of the Prime Ministers' style of spy thrillers after the rather over the top shenanigans of the Bourne/Spooks action thrillers. (It also I guess works as a good palate cleanser in preparation for the forthcoming remake of Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy)
I am not exactly sure how it will go down in the US as the plot revolves around a source revealing the exact locations of secret US torture sites around the world with the titular page eight being the off hand remark in the file that reveals that the British Prime Minister knew of these actions and colluded with the US in deceiving the British public. Throw in the subplot involving Rachel Weisz as a daughter of a Middle Eastern activist who is looking for justice for her brother killled by the IDF while protesting the demolition of houses in the West Bank during the building of the security wall, a plot which feels as if it combines the current issues involving the Wall with the issues surrounding the protracted inquiry into the death of Tom Hurndall in 2003 (or perhaps even more pertinently, Rachel Corrie), and it might make uncomfortable viewing for some.
The other major 2003 issue that seems to get folded into the drama is the death of David Kelly since Michael Gambon's character as the head of the security agency, after passing over the dossier then suffers a suspiciously fatal heart attack at his home (I am worried that Gambon may be in that stage of his career where the roles may be trying to tell him something - either having him die here, get bumped off in The Good Shepherd, or have an incapacitating illness in The Life Aquatic! Not the most comforting kinds of roles to be offered on a regular basis!) The idea of extra-judicial killing hangs heavily throughout the film, as Bill Nighy's character then goes on the run, although this idea is kept somewhat in the background of the events. This does however lead to the marvellously tense conversation with Ralph Fiennes' deeply sinister PM when he demands the incriminating dossier back from Nighy.
I could see how some of the more mannered or oblique spy conversations could become frustrating, though there is a really nice payoff in the one scene between Nighy and Saskia Reeves talking about trust (which acts as a counterpoint to an earlier scene in which Nighy is outlining the dossier for the spiky government minister), that really mitigated that approach for me. Especially as, despite all the heavyhanded political stuff outlined above, the theme of the film feels more about trust between individual people and whether unconditional trust in another person is still at all possible.
Nighy is very good in a role that, like Matt Damon's part in The Good Shepherd, requires a certain monotonous tone to it. However he does add some nice flashes of a buried humourous personality early on (I hate those darn pass code door locks too, and always seem to be the last one informed when someone has changed the codes on them!) and has a really touching scene later in the meeting with his daughter (with a great joke about 'conceptual' artists!)
One of the great strengths of this film has to be the cast. In addition to the above I have to single out Judy Davis, who is magnificent as Nighy's sort-of nemesis in the intelligence department. There also seems to be, in the late in the film revelation about her using her son to get close to Nighy's daughter, a sly dig at the recent governmental scandal of ministers employing their relatives!