Long Strange Trip (Amir Bar-Lev, 2017)
Posted: Mon May 29, 2017 2:13 am
I just saw the Grateful Dead documentary at IFC. If you're thinking of seeing it, go ASAP because according to the theater, it will be yanked after Thursday - it's been doing exceptionally well but they were told they could NOT hold it over.
I've never been a huge fan of the Dead - my interest in them has been limited to their three best-known albums (the two country-rock albums, Live/Dead) and what may be there best-known bootlegged show, the Cornell University show from 1977. In each case, I've never been compelled to play the music all the way through, no matter how many times I've given it a try.
So I was quite surprised by how much I enjoyed the documentary, moreso because it is four hours long. (FWIW, friends of mine who were much more familiar with the band told me that most of the archival footage was new to them.) The film is pretty open about their missteps - artistic, personal and social/political - but they still came off as endearing goofballs to me. In the early years with Warner Bros., when their adventures in the studio come off as clearly misguided, I found myself unexpectedly happy and relieved when they finally broke through with their hit country-rock albums. Even better was how much of the music was actually enjoyable to a skeptic such as myself - this was a very well-curated film.
Which brings me to another point - the director was obviously a huge fan of the band, and he did an outstanding job of putting together something that would be special not only to longtime fans but for newcomers as well.
Beyond the music, it was also fascinating to see how the Dead were able to appeal to so many people across the political spectrum. Last year, I came across a survey on music and politics that showed the Grateful Dead was by far the most popular band with those who identified themselves as Republican. Odd because as the film points out, Reagan became governor of California by going after the counterculture. Quite a few older, longtime Democrats like James Cagney left the party and joined up with the GOP despite their admiration for FDR and everything the party did for the working class because they were quite afraid or appalled at what they saw in the counterculture and what it was doing to younger people in America (the drugs being the worst). So when I saw that survey, I was initially puzzled - the film itself even points out that Nancy went to a Dead show. What made the Dead (or Dead culture) different becomes apparent through the film's clear portrayal of the Dead's (and specifically Garcia's) overall philosophy, which could be interpreted as a form of libertarianism. There would still be plenty of contradictions, but it's easy to see how the basic tenets of the way the band managed its affairs can appeal to many pre-Trump Republicans. (To be clear, the music would be the most important, but I imagine these other aspects of the band help make them favorites above other bands.)
I've never been a huge fan of the Dead - my interest in them has been limited to their three best-known albums (the two country-rock albums, Live/Dead) and what may be there best-known bootlegged show, the Cornell University show from 1977. In each case, I've never been compelled to play the music all the way through, no matter how many times I've given it a try.
So I was quite surprised by how much I enjoyed the documentary, moreso because it is four hours long. (FWIW, friends of mine who were much more familiar with the band told me that most of the archival footage was new to them.) The film is pretty open about their missteps - artistic, personal and social/political - but they still came off as endearing goofballs to me. In the early years with Warner Bros., when their adventures in the studio come off as clearly misguided, I found myself unexpectedly happy and relieved when they finally broke through with their hit country-rock albums. Even better was how much of the music was actually enjoyable to a skeptic such as myself - this was a very well-curated film.
Which brings me to another point - the director was obviously a huge fan of the band, and he did an outstanding job of putting together something that would be special not only to longtime fans but for newcomers as well.
Beyond the music, it was also fascinating to see how the Dead were able to appeal to so many people across the political spectrum. Last year, I came across a survey on music and politics that showed the Grateful Dead was by far the most popular band with those who identified themselves as Republican. Odd because as the film points out, Reagan became governor of California by going after the counterculture. Quite a few older, longtime Democrats like James Cagney left the party and joined up with the GOP despite their admiration for FDR and everything the party did for the working class because they were quite afraid or appalled at what they saw in the counterculture and what it was doing to younger people in America (the drugs being the worst). So when I saw that survey, I was initially puzzled - the film itself even points out that Nancy went to a Dead show. What made the Dead (or Dead culture) different becomes apparent through the film's clear portrayal of the Dead's (and specifically Garcia's) overall philosophy, which could be interpreted as a form of libertarianism. There would still be plenty of contradictions, but it's easy to see how the basic tenets of the way the band managed its affairs can appeal to many pre-Trump Republicans. (To be clear, the music would be the most important, but I imagine these other aspects of the band help make them favorites above other bands.)