V/H/S Series (2012-∞)
Posted: Thu Jun 20, 2013 8:31 pm
If it is OK, I'll just keep using this thread as a place to put horror film viewings into:
V/H/S (Various, 2012)
This is a strangely disappointing anthology film, although it is unsatisfying and kind of annoying in all sorts of interesting ways! If you just want 'horrific' imagery, it is here in abundance, but if you are looking for interesting stories with compelling characters then you will probably feel short changed - perhaps the best way to describe all of the various films is just as a lot of 'stuff' that happens.
But before I get into that perhaps I should get into another criticism of the film - the weird wording of "VHS" in the title should have alerted me to the idea that it wasn't going to be that faithful to the format, but very few of the films feature anything like VHS technology in them at all! For example presumably all of the films within a film are meant to be contemporary set, but they all involve characters video taping each other using the cassettes rather than SD cards or so on! The Joe Swanberg directed segment is even entirely Skype-based! The only segment that really plays fair with the concept is the final segment called "10/31/98", which at least suggests that a VHS video camera would be actually appropriate in that period of time!
Unfortunately this issue also plays havoc with the framing story too, which involves a group of Harmony Korine-esque young lawbreakers after they are done doing their equivalent of trash humping for the day getting hired to break into a house and find a tape, unfortunately finding a dead man slumped in front of a television surrounded by all kinds of tapes. One by one each member of the group is left alone with the body and television and start playing the tapes. We then see each of the films within a film segments: segments that involve Skype-chat conversations and weird videos from all sorts of eras that could either never have physically been captured on video tape due to their format, or end in such a way that as an audience member I wondered how exactly they were able to have turned into video tapes! Perhaps there is a supernatural or mysterious reason for this (especially later in the film when the television seems to be running itself), but that is bizarrely something that the film never explores at all, and in fact seems strangely incurious with regard to!
I'm pretty sure that I'm way overthinking this and that it probably was just seen to be a neat way to link a bunch of disparate 'video taped' stories together, but on first hearing about the film I remember thinking that it could have been a really great way to link an anthology film together - strange weird tapes that shouldn't by rights exist, mysterious images and maybe a sense of growing disquiet and a developing investigation into what is happening during the linking segments (after all this is really the core idea of what made the Ring films so creepy). Unfortunately the filmmakers bizarrely set up such an intriguing premise with lots of possibilities and then proceed to do exactly nothing with it, simply showing one member after another of the group sitting in front of the TV and then a jump scare at the end that doesn't really explain anything at all. When the best part of the entire film is the, again Harmony Korine-esque, sequence of the group having fun trashing a dilapidated house and trying to assault students in a car park before they go off to their assignment, all captured on grimy distorted video (a sequence of images that is quite neatly reprised before the end credits, with a moment in that reprisal that is strangely reminiscent of the notorious Sybil Danning end credits from Howling II!), then the film has serious problems!
This is the major problem of the entire film though, and it affects all of the individual segments. Most of the segments, like the framing story, play vaguely interestingly whilst they are going on. There is some action and occasionally some twists. But there is always a sense that the reasons for the characters actually doing what they are doing hasn't been properly laid out! The characters are in their situations but how and why? I don't think that I've ever seen a film before where everything falls apart if you start seriously thinking about why characters are doing what they are doing, and this happens in every segment!
For example how exactly does the website that the guys are assaulting people for in the framing section work? Then how long has the 'real sex' website that the guys in the first segment been running? Presumably not long enough for the guys to have never encountered a drunk girl falling unconscious on them before, thereby ruining their planned night of videotaped sex! What exactly is the state of the couple's relationship in the second story, 'Second Honeymoon'? Without sketching in any kind of relationship dynamics (apart from a tiff over money being removed from the guy's wallet) the twist at the end only works as a surprise, not as a comeuppance or betrayal of one of the other characters. Similarly the first segment, 'Amateur Night', by not sketching in the dynamics of the guys and their website prevents the run in with the Jeepers Creepers-esque demon woman from playing out as a comeuppance or undeserved punishment, and more just as a series of gory murders. (The big-eyed woman kept reminding me of this drug-and-drive ad, and the scene in the film of driving back from the nightclub after having picked up the girls could have directly come from it!)
These stories are keeping the short story structures of classic horror anthology films but losing any moral element, or really relatable characters, perhaps secure in the knowledge that a gory payoff and a facile twist are all that is needed. But if we have learnt anything from Switchblade Romance/Haute Tension, it should be that this isn't really enough!
And it continues...'Thursday the 14th' is a kind of goofy blackly comic (in the grand tradition of anthology films, the tone of the stories varies wildly!) version of the 'kids go into the woods to be picked off one by one' slasher film. I think it is the best of all the segments, with its neat twist that the heroine after surviving a previous massacre has actually brought three uncomprehending friends into the woods in order to 'bait' the killer into showing his face. That premise, and the way that the unkillable killer has a video effect on them that means that they cannot be captured on tape, could be the basis of a brilliantly subversive Cabin In The Woods-style film. Here, despite game performances from the cast of kids, the plot is allowed to peter out.
(The big unresolved issue that plagues 'Thursday the 14th' is that if the killer is so deadly, had the heroine seemingly entered the woods alone on a previous occasion in order to dig all the conveniently placed spike traps and such that she tries to trap him with during the final chase? And if she had, how did she escape then?)
The Joe Swanberg directed segment 'The Sick Thing That Happened To Emily When She Was Younger' is also problematic and predicated around a twist that transforms a relationship from a concerned long distance Skype-chat with a girlfriend who might be paranoid and prone to self-mutilation into a more disturbing one of manipulation of another person's fears to achieve your own goals. The twist is actually the best one in all of the segments, playing off the Paranormal Activity and Fourth Kind banging door, night vision, exploration-of-darkened-rooms-of-your-house antics quite successfully. But again we don't really know anything about the relationship here, being thrown into the middle of the situation. The boyfriend is played rather woodenly, at least compared to the actress playing the girl, and it was interesting to find out in the extras on the disc that he was an amateur actor. His slightly unconvincing and stilted, almost bored, performance does work quite well though in providing an off-key sense to his conversations with the girlfriend and especially his low key reactions to the girl showing that she has been cutting herself, and it looks as if the role might have been tailored to someone without obvious acting chops in order to make the final twist play better.
While the Swanberg segment completely throws away the 'VHS' shakeycam gimmick for a Skype-based video chat device (causing the problems with the believability of the framing story as discussed above!) that helps it fit much more into Swanberg's technology focused feature works, particularly LOL.
"10/31/98" is a light and fun but totally insubstantial way of finishing off the film, as a bunch of guys go around to a haunted house for Halloween and find it deserted, except for a strange chanting coming from upstairs. What follows takes a bit of the current trend for exorcism movies, throws in an escape from a shifting haunted house (with some neat CGI tricks that take it into the territory of the House on Haunted Hill remake) and then an ending that suggests the obvious - that they really shouldn't have saved that tied up girl in the attic after all!
So a very problematic and unsatisfying anthology, throwing a lot of half-understood (by the filmmakers) horror imagery at the wall (without explaining much of it), and seeing what will stick. The VHS gimmick is more of a hindrance than a help too, and gets abandoned almost at will, though it must have been a painstaking and logistical nightmare for all of the various directors to have kept the technique going throughout the film. Though it is interesting that the usual traits of a 'found footage' video - the tracking grain, cuts to a blank blue screen and Cloverfield-style jump cuts showing flashes of a previous film recorded underneath the one we are watching (all of which are present and correct) - really take second place to stranger repeated motifs of most of the stories from the way that they mostly start with the characters preparing for a night out or driving in cars on trips to showing insides of motel rooms and air conditioners, to characters tripping and falling over then slowly filming their feet and an approaching menacing character while lying on the ground, to the problematic use of the female characters mostly just as sex objects to be projected onto (something which is often acknowledged in the segments, but which often plays less as subversion of a camera's gaze than as a 'having your cake and eating it' attitude!)
V/H/S (Various, 2012)
This is a strangely disappointing anthology film, although it is unsatisfying and kind of annoying in all sorts of interesting ways! If you just want 'horrific' imagery, it is here in abundance, but if you are looking for interesting stories with compelling characters then you will probably feel short changed - perhaps the best way to describe all of the various films is just as a lot of 'stuff' that happens.
But before I get into that perhaps I should get into another criticism of the film - the weird wording of "VHS" in the title should have alerted me to the idea that it wasn't going to be that faithful to the format, but very few of the films feature anything like VHS technology in them at all! For example presumably all of the films within a film are meant to be contemporary set, but they all involve characters video taping each other using the cassettes rather than SD cards or so on! The Joe Swanberg directed segment is even entirely Skype-based! The only segment that really plays fair with the concept is the final segment called "10/31/98", which at least suggests that a VHS video camera would be actually appropriate in that period of time!
Unfortunately this issue also plays havoc with the framing story too, which involves a group of Harmony Korine-esque young lawbreakers after they are done doing their equivalent of trash humping for the day getting hired to break into a house and find a tape, unfortunately finding a dead man slumped in front of a television surrounded by all kinds of tapes. One by one each member of the group is left alone with the body and television and start playing the tapes. We then see each of the films within a film segments: segments that involve Skype-chat conversations and weird videos from all sorts of eras that could either never have physically been captured on video tape due to their format, or end in such a way that as an audience member I wondered how exactly they were able to have turned into video tapes! Perhaps there is a supernatural or mysterious reason for this (especially later in the film when the television seems to be running itself), but that is bizarrely something that the film never explores at all, and in fact seems strangely incurious with regard to!
I'm pretty sure that I'm way overthinking this and that it probably was just seen to be a neat way to link a bunch of disparate 'video taped' stories together, but on first hearing about the film I remember thinking that it could have been a really great way to link an anthology film together - strange weird tapes that shouldn't by rights exist, mysterious images and maybe a sense of growing disquiet and a developing investigation into what is happening during the linking segments (after all this is really the core idea of what made the Ring films so creepy). Unfortunately the filmmakers bizarrely set up such an intriguing premise with lots of possibilities and then proceed to do exactly nothing with it, simply showing one member after another of the group sitting in front of the TV and then a jump scare at the end that doesn't really explain anything at all. When the best part of the entire film is the, again Harmony Korine-esque, sequence of the group having fun trashing a dilapidated house and trying to assault students in a car park before they go off to their assignment, all captured on grimy distorted video (a sequence of images that is quite neatly reprised before the end credits, with a moment in that reprisal that is strangely reminiscent of the notorious Sybil Danning end credits from Howling II!), then the film has serious problems!
This is the major problem of the entire film though, and it affects all of the individual segments. Most of the segments, like the framing story, play vaguely interestingly whilst they are going on. There is some action and occasionally some twists. But there is always a sense that the reasons for the characters actually doing what they are doing hasn't been properly laid out! The characters are in their situations but how and why? I don't think that I've ever seen a film before where everything falls apart if you start seriously thinking about why characters are doing what they are doing, and this happens in every segment!
For example how exactly does the website that the guys are assaulting people for in the framing section work? Then how long has the 'real sex' website that the guys in the first segment been running? Presumably not long enough for the guys to have never encountered a drunk girl falling unconscious on them before, thereby ruining their planned night of videotaped sex! What exactly is the state of the couple's relationship in the second story, 'Second Honeymoon'? Without sketching in any kind of relationship dynamics (apart from a tiff over money being removed from the guy's wallet) the twist at the end only works as a surprise, not as a comeuppance or betrayal of one of the other characters. Similarly the first segment, 'Amateur Night', by not sketching in the dynamics of the guys and their website prevents the run in with the Jeepers Creepers-esque demon woman from playing out as a comeuppance or undeserved punishment, and more just as a series of gory murders. (The big-eyed woman kept reminding me of this drug-and-drive ad, and the scene in the film of driving back from the nightclub after having picked up the girls could have directly come from it!)
These stories are keeping the short story structures of classic horror anthology films but losing any moral element, or really relatable characters, perhaps secure in the knowledge that a gory payoff and a facile twist are all that is needed. But if we have learnt anything from Switchblade Romance/Haute Tension, it should be that this isn't really enough!
And it continues...'Thursday the 14th' is a kind of goofy blackly comic (in the grand tradition of anthology films, the tone of the stories varies wildly!) version of the 'kids go into the woods to be picked off one by one' slasher film. I think it is the best of all the segments, with its neat twist that the heroine after surviving a previous massacre has actually brought three uncomprehending friends into the woods in order to 'bait' the killer into showing his face. That premise, and the way that the unkillable killer has a video effect on them that means that they cannot be captured on tape, could be the basis of a brilliantly subversive Cabin In The Woods-style film. Here, despite game performances from the cast of kids, the plot is allowed to peter out.
(The big unresolved issue that plagues 'Thursday the 14th' is that if the killer is so deadly, had the heroine seemingly entered the woods alone on a previous occasion in order to dig all the conveniently placed spike traps and such that she tries to trap him with during the final chase? And if she had, how did she escape then?)
The Joe Swanberg directed segment 'The Sick Thing That Happened To Emily When She Was Younger' is also problematic and predicated around a twist that transforms a relationship from a concerned long distance Skype-chat with a girlfriend who might be paranoid and prone to self-mutilation into a more disturbing one of manipulation of another person's fears to achieve your own goals. The twist is actually the best one in all of the segments, playing off the Paranormal Activity and Fourth Kind banging door, night vision, exploration-of-darkened-rooms-of-your-house antics quite successfully. But again we don't really know anything about the relationship here, being thrown into the middle of the situation. The boyfriend is played rather woodenly, at least compared to the actress playing the girl, and it was interesting to find out in the extras on the disc that he was an amateur actor. His slightly unconvincing and stilted, almost bored, performance does work quite well though in providing an off-key sense to his conversations with the girlfriend and especially his low key reactions to the girl showing that she has been cutting herself, and it looks as if the role might have been tailored to someone without obvious acting chops in order to make the final twist play better.
While the Swanberg segment completely throws away the 'VHS' shakeycam gimmick for a Skype-based video chat device (causing the problems with the believability of the framing story as discussed above!) that helps it fit much more into Swanberg's technology focused feature works, particularly LOL.
"10/31/98" is a light and fun but totally insubstantial way of finishing off the film, as a bunch of guys go around to a haunted house for Halloween and find it deserted, except for a strange chanting coming from upstairs. What follows takes a bit of the current trend for exorcism movies, throws in an escape from a shifting haunted house (with some neat CGI tricks that take it into the territory of the House on Haunted Hill remake) and then an ending that suggests the obvious - that they really shouldn't have saved that tied up girl in the attic after all!
So a very problematic and unsatisfying anthology, throwing a lot of half-understood (by the filmmakers) horror imagery at the wall (without explaining much of it), and seeing what will stick. The VHS gimmick is more of a hindrance than a help too, and gets abandoned almost at will, though it must have been a painstaking and logistical nightmare for all of the various directors to have kept the technique going throughout the film. Though it is interesting that the usual traits of a 'found footage' video - the tracking grain, cuts to a blank blue screen and Cloverfield-style jump cuts showing flashes of a previous film recorded underneath the one we are watching (all of which are present and correct) - really take second place to stranger repeated motifs of most of the stories from the way that they mostly start with the characters preparing for a night out or driving in cars on trips to showing insides of motel rooms and air conditioners, to characters tripping and falling over then slowly filming their feet and an approaching menacing character while lying on the ground, to the problematic use of the female characters mostly just as sex objects to be projected onto (something which is often acknowledged in the segments, but which often plays less as subversion of a camera's gaze than as a 'having your cake and eating it' attitude!)