Page 1 of 1
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 4:21 am
by Jeff
Glamorous socialite Helen Wright (Joan Crawford) takes what she wants clothes, alcohol, men uses them up and tosses them aside. Then she meets brilliant young violinist Paul Boray (John Garfield). But this is one toy she can’t break. Instead, her love for Paul brings Helen to the breaking point. In this acclaimed and profound exploration of desire, Crawford makes Helen a rich, layered character torn between selfless love and selfish impulses. Garfield matches her as the driven genius. Humoresque’s production values extend to the musical interludes, dubbed by Isaac Stern. Garfield’s dazzling technique is thanks to two real violinists hidden behind him one to do the fingering and one the bow work.
Features include:
* 1.37:1 Full Frame
* English Mono
* English, French and Spanish subtitles
* New Featurette The Music of Humoresque (9:42)
* Theatrical Trailer
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 2:54 pm
by KJB2
Is there a release date for this new batch of Crawford/Davis titles? I've been waiting for this (Humoresque) and The Star for some time, so this is great news indeed . . .
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 3:14 pm
by Jeff
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2005 4:46 pm
by KJB2
Thanks for the info. And on my birthday no less. . .
Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2005 7:28 pm
by Michael Strangeways
Considering that Joan and Bette weren't exactly the closest of chums, I'm sure there's a lot of grave spinning going on at the announcement of their DVD sets being released simultaneously....
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 3:56 am
by swimminghorses
Does anybody find this movie even slightly amazing in that most of it is music and cinematography. I am not sure that I have ever seen a non musical with so little dialogue. But with photography like that and two faces that are incredibly photographable one doesnt need to do much but listen and watch Joan Crawford and John Garfield. I was very impressed.
By the way without needing to be said I will say the transfer is Warnerific!
Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 9:38 am
by skuhn8
and a two
Re: Humoresque
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 8:26 pm
by souvenir
It seemed like this film starts as a John Garfield picture and ends up a Joan Crawford one, with Oscar Levant in his own one-man show at all times. I do wonder if it might have been stronger overall had the Crawford character been played by someone less, say, Joan Crawford-y. As it is, the idea of a romance, and such a shattering one especially, between the two seems too unbelievable to fully work.
I don't think Crawford pairs up well with male actors in any of her starring films, really. Maybe Henry Fonda in Daisy Kenyon, but that's more because of his character and performance than hers.
Re: Humoresque
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 3:48 am
by Jack Phillips
souvenir wrote:
I don't think Crawford pairs up well with male actors in any of her starring films, really. Maybe Henry Fonda in Daisy Kenyon, but that's more because of his character and performance than hers.
I'd say the difference is in the writing. All three legs of the triangle hold up well in DK, because each character is written as an adult.
Re: Humoresque
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 7:26 pm
by HarryLong
Orpheus wrote:I love "Humoresque," and I've seen many accounts, including that of Oscar Levant -- who, presumably, was an eyewitness -- of the arrangement by which two violinists crouched behind John Garfield, each one reaching around him.
I had no reason to doubt that story until I heard a violinist say flatly that it was bunk. Does anyone know of any first hand accounts or photos that would settle this matter?
I seem to recall Bette Davis speaking of the same stunt being used in one of her films (but on another character in the film, I think - and please don't aski
which film ... I cannot recall). It does sound uncomfortable at best & I wonder how the violininst managed accurate fingering without really being able to see the violin. It's been ages since I've seen HUMORESQUE, so I have no clue how else it might have been done. Might Garfield's head have been matted over footage of the real violinist?