Children of Men

Discuss releases from Arrow and the films on them

Moderators: MichaelB, yoloswegmaster

Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
redbill
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 6:03 pm
Location: Waltham, MA

#151 Post by redbill »

Barmy wrote:Thanks, angry lefties, for providing me with the laugh of the day. To even begin to compare CoM to current reality, or think it is even a remotely plausible scenario within the next 20 years (or ever) is silly, and an insult to the Brits. If nothing else, I recall that one of the fugees being treated in a Ghraiblike manner was Czech, and that is just beyond implausible.
damn, they had me convinced. i had already thrown away my GF's birthcontrol...
David Ehrenstein
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 12:30 am

#152 Post by David Ehrenstein »

Thanks, angry lefties, for providing me with the laugh of the day
Thanks smarmy neo-fascists for providing the knee-jerk of the day, declaring once again that art has no meaning or purpose whatsoever.
User avatar
Barmy
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 7:59 pm

#153 Post by Barmy »

I'm not smarmy.
User avatar
Steven H
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:30 pm
Location: NC

#154 Post by Steven H »

Barmy wrote:Thanks, angry lefties, for providing me with the laugh of the day. To even begin to compare CoM to current reality, or think it is even a remotely plausible scenario within the next 20 years (or ever) is silly, and an insult to the Brits. If nothing else, I recall that one of the fugees being treated in a Ghraiblike manner was Czech, and that is just beyond implausible.
My God, someone insulted Britain? The nerve. Not to get too off topic here, but isn't it funny how isolationism and exceptionalism keep switching hands between the right and left? CoM seems to posit that Britain, under "duress", has resorted to an extreme of both, but even the european left has only recently given a little way towards flexible borders, and it's becoming politically mainstream in Britian to not think it's the center of the universe. A curious situation, but unlike in the US, which is where the real aim of the film comes down, and despite the relatively new and strict work Visa situation, Cuaron doesn't seem that interested in the UK. Another shot at fans of the book, that he would use it as a springboard to discuss the politics of a completely different country.

A Czech surely *can* be tortured, unless invincibility is within reach of their race. Many people thought we saw the last of White People Genocide until Bosnians started piling up in mass graves a while back. Just be glad you don't live in Baghdad, where you're in the middle of a violent civil war AND oppressive occupation (not to mention the lawlessness spread out over Asia and Africa of late, CoM might hit a little close to home for these people). Enough preachiness from me (I'm left-wing *and* preachy, hold the phone.)
User avatar
tavernier
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 11:18 pm

#155 Post by tavernier »

Andrew Sarris is not impressed:

Alfonso Cuarón's Children of Men, from a screenplay by Mr. Cuarón, Timothy J. Sexton, David Arata, Mark Fergus and Hawk Ostby, is based on the futuristic sci-fi novel by P.D. James. If I had seen it before I compiled my “Movies Other People Liked and I Didn'tâ€
User avatar
tavernier
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 11:18 pm

#156 Post by tavernier »

Can I join Barmy's Smarmy Army?
David Ehrenstein
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 12:30 am

#157 Post by David Ehrenstein »

Jose Padilla, the famous "shoe bomber" is another such story. This hapless gang-banger has now been so severely tortured that it's impossible for him to stand trial for anything -- which was of course the whole plan.

Andrew Sarris has been wrong about a million things.
David Ehrenstein
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 12:30 am

#158 Post by David Ehrenstein »

User avatar
tavernier
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 11:18 pm

#159 Post by tavernier »

All this reality doesn't make "Children of Men" a good movie--not by a long shot (or close-up).
David Ehrenstein
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 12:30 am

#160 Post by David Ehrenstein »

How about a medium two-shot?
Napoleon
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:55 am

#161 Post by Napoleon »

Edit: SPOILERS!

I really wanted to like Children of Men and although I certainly didn't dislike it did take a few clumsy miss-steps.

The first 10 minutes are breathtaking in their execution. The cafe scene and the aftermath of baby Diego giving way to an overwhelming feeling of sadness as Theo returns to his office where his fellow workers are unable to absorb what is happening. The sense of melancholy, decay and impending extinction is tangible. The look and feel of Children of Men is exactly how V For Vendetta should have, but didn't look and feel.

The long takes are of course majestic.

Then there are lots of nice touches:
There are no new cars, because there is no point in making them.
The reveal (when they go straight to Jasper's hidden house) that the fishes were not lying when they told Theo they had been following him.
The tune that Jasper is listening to at first would be from when he was young man.
Sid's inability to refer to himself as me or I.

The problems?
Lots of stodgy exposition with Julian.
Jasper's death which was shamelessly used for shock value (and wouldn't it have been an idea to interrogate him first?).
An unnecessary and stodgy bit of exposition from Farris and her experiences on a maternity ward.
The police/army letting the first child born for 18 years walk away when distracted by a couple of fishes. I'm guessing that Cuaron was making some point about the police being more interested in fighting than the possible survival of the human race, but following on from scenes where the police were dropping to their knees and crossing their chests it either didn't work or at best, jarred.
Worst of all Chiwetel Ejiofor is not given enough to do! The film would have worked better for me had he and Owen played each others parts. Ejiofor is a better actor with a more likeable screen presence.
Barmy wrote:To even begin to compare CoM to current reality, or think it is even a remotely plausible scenario within the next 20 years (or ever) is silly, and an insult to the Brits.
I'm a Brit and I'm not insulted by the events depicted here. Given the current climate in Britain these events seem plausible *if* a major event such as mass infertility were to occur.
Barmy wrote:If nothing else, I recall that one of the fugees being treated in a Ghraiblike manner was Czech, and that is just beyond implausible.
Racism on the scale seen here has nothing to do with race or colour (it rarely does). It is a means for the people in power to keep the majority content by giving them an artificial scapegoat for all their problems.

And I'm poitically dead centre with leanings to the extreme right and left.
David Ehrenstein
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 12:30 am

#162 Post by David Ehrenstein »

Good post, Napoleon. I can't quite agree about Jasper's death. The fact thast they don't interrogate him only goes to show how batshit crazy things have become.

The song he listens to is "Ruby Tuesday" from the Stones' epochal Between the Buttons album (thus connecting this film with The Royal Tenenbaums.)

Not quite sure about "stody exposition" either because, to my mind, the film depicts a series of events that just keep popelling forward almost spontaneously. Yes there are "reasons" why tings are happening, but Curaon shows wha it's like to live -- and die -- in the moment.
Napoleon
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:55 am

#163 Post by Napoleon »

David Ehrenstein wrote:I can't quite agree about Jasper's death. The fact thast they don't interrogate him only goes to show how batshit crazy things have become.
The problem I had is that Jasper is made to be such a sympathetic character for the audience and his death is so irrational and cold-blooded that I couldn't help but feel manipulated.
You are probably correct about the batshit aspect.
There is quite a nice feint where Cuaron uses the suicide pack to make us think that Jasper will kill himself. As he doesn't when we see him outside we are led to believe that he will survive. It nearly works.
David Ehrenstein wrote:The song he listens to is "Ruby Tuesday" from the Stones' epochal Between the Buttons album (thus connecting this film with The Royal Tenenbaums.)
I was referring to the cover of "Hush" by Kula Shaker (shudders), sorry should have mentioned this specifically.
David Ehrenstein wrote:Not quite sure about "stodgy exposition" either because, to my mind, the film depicts a series of events that just keep propelling forward almost spontaneously. Yes there are "reasons" why things are happening, but Curaon shows what it's like to live -- and die -- in the moment.
Perhaps subsequent viewings will reveal this to me. I accept that my first opinion of a film is not my final opinion.

I'd like to add that after making some (but not all) dreadful films through the 80's/90's that it is good top see Caine reinventing himself as a reliable supporting character actor. He seems to be really enjoying his work again.
scalesojustice
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 3:25 pm
Contact:

#164 Post by scalesojustice »

Napoleon wrote:The problem I had is that Jasper is made to be such a sympathetic character for the audience and his death is so irrational and cold-blooded that I couldn't help but feel manipulated.
Spoiler
i don't think it was too irrational as everyone who tried to help the woman with the baby had to die.
David Ehrenstein
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 12:30 am

#165 Post by David Ehrenstein »

"it is good top see Caine reinventing himself as a reliable supporting character actor. He seems to be really enjoying his work again."
Indeed. In some recent interviews he's made it clear that he enjoys playing juicy supporting roles like this rather than being forced to carry a entire picture as its star. He's been there, done that.
User avatar
Steven H
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:30 pm
Location: NC

#166 Post by Steven H »

For what it's worth, and it may mean nothing, but a good Bosnian friend of mine said that the first foreign language utterred in the film is Bosnian, a woman behind one of those "gates" saying she's hungry and begging for food.
User avatar
toiletduck!
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:43 pm
Location: The 'Go
Contact:

#167 Post by toiletduck! »

A Qantas representative wrote:Whether made verbally or on a t-shirt, comments with the potential to offend other customers ... will not be tolerated
Should I ever find myself needing to fly Qantas, they had best be prepared for a smattering of Helen Keller jokes whilst in the air.

-Toilet Dcuk
User avatar
miless
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 1:45 am

#168 Post by miless »

toiletduck! wrote:
A Qantas representative wrote:Whether made verbally or on a t-shirt, comments with the potential to offend other customers ... will not be tolerated
Should I ever find myself needing to fly Qantas, they had best be prepared for a smattering of Helen Keller jokes whilst in the air.

-Toilet Dcuk
why can't Helen Keller drive?
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm

#169 Post by domino harvey »

because she's a woman
User avatar
miless
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 1:45 am

#170 Post by miless »

domino harvey wrote:because she's a woman
right on the nose
marty

#171 Post by marty »

davidhare wrote:This in today's Sydney Morning Herald:

http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/qan ... 07525.html
I don't have a problem with this directive from Qantas. I am a frequent overseas flyer and the next thing I want is for some bozzo to be wearing 'Bush is the World's Number One Terrorist." Whether you agree with the statement or not is irrelevant. Can you imagine the uproar if one was wearing a T-shirt "All Muslims are terrorists so watch out for them on this flight"? Everyone would just go nuts and be up in arms.
User avatar
toiletduck!
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:43 pm
Location: The 'Go
Contact:

#172 Post by toiletduck! »

marty wrote:I don't have a problem with this directive from Qantas. I am a frequent overseas flyer and the next thing I want is for some bozzo to be wearing 'Bush is the World's Number One Terrorist." Whether you agree with the statement or not is irrelevant. Can you imagine the uproar if one was wearing a T-shirt "All Muslims are terrorists so watch out for them on this flight"? Everyone would just go nuts and be up in arms.
Well then everyone needs to calm the hell down and realize that, while the man in the shirt is probably a moron, they can take smug comfort in the fact that they are not the man in the shirt who everyone thinks is a moron.

I'm not trying to derail this, as it had been riding that line quite adeptly, but marty, you do realize just how very little is separating your post from an all-out condoning of censorship. Don't you? Please say you do.

-Toilet Dcuk
marty

#173 Post by marty »

toiletduck! wrote:
marty wrote:I don't have a problem with this directive from Qantas. I am a frequent overseas flyer and the next thing I want is for some bozzo to be wearing 'Bush is the World's Number One Terrorist." Whether you agree with the statement or not is irrelevant. Can you imagine the uproar if one was wearing a T-shirt "All Muslims are terrorists so watch out for them on this flight"? Everyone would just go nuts and be up in arms.
Well then everyone needs to calm the hell down and realize that, while the man in the shirt is probably a moron, they can take smug comfort in the fact that they are not the man in the shirt who everyone thinks is a moron.

I'm not trying to derail this, as it had been riding that line quite adeptly, but marty, you do realize just how very little is separating your post from an all-out condoning of censorship. Don't you? Please say you do.

-Toilet Dcuk
Censorship? I don't think so. This guy is trying to make a point of free speech. Well, isn't he clever? The fact is we cannot go on saying whatever we want to say and then hide behind freedom of speech without facing the consequences. What if he had a T-shirt saying "I love having sex with six year old boys?" This nut would then claim freedom of speech again.

Flying is nerve-wracking enough to some these days that we don't need to be reminded of terrorism by some bozzo. This guy could be a nut job who plans on hijacking the plane or opening the door in mid-flight. Who knows?
marty

#174 Post by marty »

davidhare, I take your point but why are you and most of western media so focused on Muslim deaths and not deaths of any Jews in Israel. I remember during the recent Lebanon war that in one instance 12 Muslims were killed but at the same time 8 Jewish people were also killed but strangely enough this never made the news.

If one looks back at history and the excellent account of Middle Eastern history is Bernard Lewis' "From Babel to Dragoman", the Jewish people have just as much right as the Palestinian to that land in Israel yet we often hear Muslims bleat how the Jews "stole" their land. No, they didn't. Most of the new state of Israel back in 1948 when Israel was founded, the land was very barren and largely uninhabitable although 200,000 Palestinian had to make way for the incoming Jews (but this is small amount when considering how many actually arrived). The Jews worked hard in developing the land to make it their home and many Muslims were envious of them developing so many riches and westernising the land which so often is against their own religion, beliefs and values. This is never portrayed in western media. The Jews are made out as evil as Satan (no, I am not Jewish!).

During the recent Lebanon war, there was hardly any mention in the local media about how Hezbollah manipulated the media for their benefit. They also fired their missiled into Israel from heavily populated areas knowing full well that Israel will fire back and thus killing innocent civilians. There was one instance where a young girl died in a local hospital from an accident not related to any attack and several members of Hezbollan took her lifeless body from the hospital into the war zone where a man was seen carrying her body. Of course, the western media jumped all over this thinking she died in the nearby bomb blast. She never did but Hezbollah received heaps of sympathy. This story was corrected by a Lebanese journalist who knew the true story. Yet, Israel is being portrayed as the evil state in western media.

I am often amazed how few deaths of Jews are portrayed in western media as if a Jewish life is considered not as worthy as a Muslim one.
marty

#175 Post by marty »

davidhare wrote:Marty this whol discussion is entirely a propos of the Cuaron.

Lets take it elsewhere.
I agree.
Post Reply