To Catch a Thief - Special Collector's Edition

Discuss North American DVDs, Blu-rays, UHDs, and related topics
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Ashirg
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:10 pm
Location: Atlanta

#1 Post by Ashirg »

Fuck Paramount. They are releasing another version of To Catch a Thief on May 8 instead of any other classic film from their library, like Ace in the Hole. At least they are not calling it "A leg or a breast Edition".

Image
marty

#2 Post by marty »

I mistakenly purchased this DVD never having seen it before. This must be Hitchcock's worst film, by far. I think it was just an excuse for a holiday down to the South of France.
User avatar
godardslave
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:44 pm
Location: Confusing and open ended = high art.

#3 Post by godardslave »

However, Grace Kelly is so beautiful it doesnt matter how bad the film is.
User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

#4 Post by Antoine Doinel »

marty wrote:I mistakenly purchased this DVD never having seen it before. This must be Hitchcock's worst film, by far. I think it was just an excuse for a holiday down to the South of France.
I concur. I bought it in a dump bin at WalMart for $5. Grace Kelly might be nice to look at but whatever tanning solution Grant is wearing is appalling.
User avatar
denti alligator
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:36 am
Location: "born in heaven, raised in hell"

#5 Post by denti alligator »

Yes, sadly one of Hitch's worst. I own just about every Hitch film on DVD, but not this one. And some "special edition" isn't going to change my mind. Grace Kelly ... I don't know. She's no Ingrid Bergman.
User avatar
Via_Chicago
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 4:03 pm

#6 Post by Via_Chicago »

I enjoy this film only insofar as it features Cary Grant. Otherwise, it's one of Hitchcock's least suspensful, least romantic, and least interesting films, but I always enjoy watching Cary do his thing.

I agree with the general consensus though, this film did not need a "special edition."
User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

#7 Post by Antoine Doinel »

My gut tells me this is nothing more than Paramount repackaging the current edition which already has a decent amount of featurettes and the film's trailer.
Harvey Domino
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 10:18 am
Contact:

#8 Post by Harvey Domino »

You guys are crazy! I love this film -- no, it's not suspenseful or romantic, etc. but I think it's really charming, and quite funny. I can think of at least 15 Hitchcock films that I like less... but then my favorite Hitch has always been The Trouble With Harry, so my opinion may not be considered valid.
User avatar
Poncho Punch
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:07 pm
Location: the emerald empire

#9 Post by Poncho Punch »

I really like the film, as well. I don't think it's one of Hitchcock's best films, but I think it's a nice departure for him. Also, pairing it with John Woo's Once A Thief really highlights the similarities between Cary Grant and Chow Yun-Fat.
User avatar
Joe Buck
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 10:59 pm
Location: New York

#10 Post by Joe Buck »

Has this been restored? Because the last release looked wretched!
User avatar
manicsounds
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 2:58 am
Location: Tokyo, Japan

#11 Post by manicsounds »

Anamorphic Widescreen Presentation, digitally restored
English DD2.0 Stereo
Commentary by Peter Bogdanovich and Laurent Bouzereau
Theatrical Trailer
Writing and Casting ‘To Catch A Thief'
Alfred Hitchcock and ‘To Catch A Thief': An Appreciation
Edith Head: The Paramount Years

thats it.....
evillights
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 6:47 pm
Location: U.S.
Contact:

#12 Post by evillights »

'To Catch a Thief' may not be in the absolutely top tier of Hitchcock, but it's still an absolutely brilliant film. Some thoughts I wrote recently on my blog-thing:

==

A tourist vision of France, "movie France," because 'To Catch a Thief' (1955) is what it looks like when Alfred Hitchcock goes on vacation. After all, shooting in Europe, you get to "write off" your expenses.

If this is taking a break, then once upon a time Monsieur Hulot really did tear the cosmos in two.

One page of the account-book reads: John Robie (Cary Grant): "former cat burglar of Paris before the war" > The New York Herald Tribune = Art ("And I'm Dead") Buchwald <= Gina Lollobrigida.

"Parles anglais!" (barks the dubbed Charles Vanel) —

Danielle (Brigitte Auber) works for her father. Her rival, "Frances" (aren't they all! / Grace Kelly) works for her mother, as a sexual proxy. She screams to Cary Grant (shortly after the fireworks burst in one of Hitch's best scenes) — "You stole mother's jewels!" For Grant, Kelly's sex is a mystery (see the shadow-cowl'd face while the ice around her neck glistens); he is the Celibate, the Thief who steals the jewels for no effective gain, generative or psychosexual. He is "apart," alone. He takes to the roofs (so adeptly), he squats in the chimney-crannies, this American who moved to France, who became a thief, who became a Resistance fighter (for the sake of his own freedom, consequently, as much as the country's), who became a vintner and a flower-harvester... all while playing the bon français with such sartorial panache.

"Slap!" — To watch the funeral scene is to peer into the core of the 'To Catch a Thief'-mechanism: a Hitch-wound* biography of the man who went by "Cary Grant."

* 'Rear Window' (1954) — See A.H. at the mantle in the composer's apartment.
ByMarkClark.com
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2005 7:59 pm
Location: Columbus, OH
Contact:

#13 Post by ByMarkClark.com »

I, too, enjoy the uncommonly bright, relatively lightweight TO CATCH A THIEF. It's the Hitchcock equivalent of a beachside paperback. Hardly the director's best work, but a perfectly enjoyable confection.
User avatar
Joe Buck
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 10:59 pm
Location: New York

#14 Post by Joe Buck »

manicsounds wrote:Anamorphic Widescreen Presentation, digitally restored
English DD2.0 Stereo
Commentary by Peter Bogdanovich and Laurent Bouzereau
Theatrical Trailer
Writing and Casting ‘To Catch A Thief'
Alfred Hitchcock and ‘To Catch A Thief': An Appreciation
Edith Head: The Paramount Years
Hmm...not much new, but I thought the extras on the first release were pretty good.....for Paramount. I'm waiting to see how the print looks. The last release was a disgrace. It was so wretched looking. It had no business being released on DVD like that. Let's hope that "Digitally Restored" means it will be up to snuff this time.
User avatar
devlinnn
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 7:23 am
Location: three miles from space

#15 Post by devlinnn »

A capture from the new, rather sublime, R4 edition.
User avatar
Joe Buck
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 10:59 pm
Location: New York

#16 Post by Joe Buck »

That's pretty good. So this new R1 should be using this transfer right?
User avatar
lord_clyde
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 8:22 am
Location: Ogden, UT

#17 Post by lord_clyde »

Joe Buck wrote:Has this been restored? Because the last release looked wretched!
I know! Worst 5 dollars I ever dropped!
User avatar
Polybius
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 2:57 am
Location: Rollin' down Highway 41

#18 Post by Polybius »

manicsounds wrote:Commentary by Peter Bogdanovich
Oh, good Lord...

Glad to see some good, honest hate for this crummy excuse for a romance.
denti alligator wrote: Grace Kelly ... I don't know. She's no Ingrid Bergman.
Well put, sir.

A classic example of how a woman can be gorgeous and yet generate zero erotic appeal.
User avatar
Ashirg
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:10 pm
Location: Atlanta

#19 Post by Ashirg »

DVD Movie Guide:
...the visuals for the 2007 DVD presented a radically improved transfer. The 2002 disc suffered from many problems, with prominent edge enhancement and lots of source flaws standing as the most significant. The 2007 transfer looked considerably better. Honestly, it was a night and day difference, as the new disc made the old one seem unwatchable.
User avatar
Highway 61
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 8:40 pm

#20 Post by Highway 61 »

User avatar
starmanof51
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 7:28 am
Location: Seattleish
Contact:

#21 Post by starmanof51 »

Polybius wrote:
denti alligator wrote: Grace Kelly ... I don't know. She's no Ingrid Bergman.
Well put, sir.

A classic example of how a woman can be gorgeous and yet generate zero erotic appeal.
I dunno, she's generating fine from where I sit. I'd trade Ingrid and a '57 Mickey Mantle for her.
User avatar
DignanSWE
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 3:30 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: To Catch a Thief - Special Collector's Edition

#22 Post by DignanSWE »

The PAL-edition looks much better than the NTSC-edition:

NTSC (dvdbeaver)
PAL* (VLC)
(not exact frame)

*R2 -- probably the same transfer as the R4 devlinnn has posted captures from
Post Reply