Criterion & Eclipse Cover Art & Packaging Babble-on Vol.3
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm
- Derek Estes
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:00 am
- Location: Portland Oregon
- TheGodfather
- Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 8:39 pm
- Location: The Netherlands
- sevenarts
- Joined: Tue May 09, 2006 11:22 pm
- Contact:
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 6:42 pm
that's the first cover in months that feels like a real Criterion and not someone from the .com forum's fan artcriterionsnob wrote:Vengeance is Mine
Last edited by domino harvey on Fri Feb 16, 2007 8:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Cinephrenic
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:58 pm
- Location: Paris, Texas
- Lino
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:18 am
- Location: Sitting End
- Contact:
- denti alligator
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 1:36 am
- Location: "born in heaven, raised in hell"
- Andre Jurieu
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:38 pm
- Location: Back in Milan (Ind.)
- Matt
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:58 pm
That Vengeance is Mine cover is hot! I'm not crazy about the Army of Shadows cover though. The gradient in the title text is so Macromedia Freehand 1995. I wish they could have done something similar to the way the text in the title card appears.
Last edited by Matt on Fri Feb 16, 2007 8:45 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
Narshty
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:27 pm
- Location: London, UK
Army of Shadows looks rotten. Really, really bad. He looks like he's been tortured with MS Paintbox. I do like Vengeance is Mine, even though it has a certain colouring of the Lord of War poster. Sansho is kinda blah, and I realise they have to produce a new cover for The Third Man, but losing the iconic shot of Welles in the doorway and replacing it with something that could just as well be The Signalman is a shame.
I'm not really fussed about any of the releases this month since they all (or will soon) have very high quality editions in the UK. The monthly rush has passed.
I'm not really fussed about any of the releases this month since they all (or will soon) have very high quality editions in the UK. The monthly rush has passed.
Last edited by Narshty on Fri Feb 16, 2007 8:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
scalesojustice
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 3:25 pm
- Contact:
- TheGodfather
- Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 8:39 pm
- Location: The Netherlands
- tryavna
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 8:38 pm
- Location: North Carolina
There's something about the starkness of the cover for Army of Shadows that works for me. Not great like the one for Sansho, but effective. (The swastika on the floor may be a little over-the-top, though.)
Last edited by tryavna on Fri Feb 16, 2007 8:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- TheGodfather
- Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 8:39 pm
- Location: The Netherlands
-
Narshty
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 6:27 pm
- Location: London, UK
What all that wasted blue space needs is a nice Hitler mugshot.TheGodfather wrote:I actually like thattryavna wrote: (The swastika on the floor may be a little over-the-top, though.)
Last edited by Narshty on Fri Feb 16, 2007 8:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Nihonophile
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 4:57 am
- Location: Florida
- Contact:
- justeleblanc
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 10:05 pm
- Location: Connecticut
What, and the title card isn't so 1985 stencil?Matt wrote:That Vengeance is Mine cover is hot! I'm not crazy about the Army of Shadows cover though. The gradient in the title text is so Macromedia Freehand 1995. I wish they could have done something similar to the way the text in the title card appears.
Am I the only one who likes the cover? I think it goes hand in hand with the stylized world of Melville's films.
It feels very Dead Zone to me.Nihonophile wrote:One thing that makes the new Third Man cover better than the original is that it keeps with the spirit of the film about the mystery enshrouding who the third man is. The original cover, which I adore, does ruin the movie's key scene for the uninitiated.
- TheGodfather
- Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 8:39 pm
- Location: The Netherlands
- Matt
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:58 pm
Posted in the Army of Shadows thread (by people who ought to know better):
Buttery Jeb wrote:Looking forward to this disc. Shame the artwork is so weak; but I think the style might come out better on a digipak. God I hope it does, at least.
justeleblanc wrote:The artwork is great, BJ. Were you hoping for a gun?
Buttery Jeb wrote:I dunno... maybe it's the awkward blue-on-blue-on-blue color scheme. Or the use of the shackled prisoner that, while iconic for the film, seems to be the only image anyone ever uses for it (the BFI disc has roughly the same image as its cover; and virtually every review I read when the film was reissued used it as well). As I said, the texture given the art by being printed on a Digipak might help; but, looking at it on a computer screen leaves me cold.
Again, this is all personal preference on my part, and I'll be picking this up regardless of what it looks like. The artwork just doesn't work for me, and it's probably my least favorite cover from Criterion in a while.
jbeall wrote:I agree that the artwork seems underwhelming. I think they want it to look similar to Le Cercle Rouge. I don't think it's bad per se, but they've had some fantastic covers lately (Green for Danger, 49th Parallel) that I feel kinda let down by this one. Doesn't matter, I'll still buy it. I'm even more excited about this purchase now that I've seen the features.
Last edited by Matt on Fri Feb 16, 2007 10:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
JabbaTheSlut
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 2:37 pm
- Location: Down there
-
JabbaTheSlut
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 2:37 pm
- Location: Down there
Yap, Ok less is more and more is less. Call me a luddite but the quick-cheap-sterile-computer-freehand-so-'98-style doesn't look too good to me. Lazy stuff. Not minimalistic at all, I find. Just sparse, undefined and quite uninspired. It's semi-Ok, but the CC looks have been better in the past. But... the film is a masterpiece and this babble is just babble.



