davidhare wrote:I love the way over at a_f_b more than one of the American posters now keeps referring to Brenda as "Her Majesty", or "Their Majesties" or something equally ludicrous! As though anyone cares. (Sorry D! It''s too much for us Colonial trash.)
I was at one of the first British press shows for
The Queen - in fact, it may have been the first press show for it anywhere in the world - and the universally-held advance opinion was that it would be dreadful. Let's face it, the subject matter was hardly appealing (and until now there has never, ever been even a halfway decent film about the present British royal family), and Frears' previous film,
Mrs Henderson Presents, had been a critical catastrophe.
Hence our surprise.
I should add a propos Powell and his DP Hans Staudinger (plus now grown up Powell Jnr of two, but uncredited assistant) VERY clearly they did (masked or framed for various regions) the Helen Nude shot in the surf to specifically get it thru the various censors in those days based on the clever projectionists' rakings. And Helen - may the Buddha Bless her - is the greatest co-conspirator imagineable.
Derek Jarman pulled off a similar trick with
Sebastiane - he asked the BBFC to screen it at 1.85:1, but it was shot in 16mm and intended to be shown at the original 1.33:1. As a result, the censors completely missed a rather blatant erection at the bottom of the frame and let it through.
(Though the stiffy in question did cause a problem later on, when Jarman popped up in a Channel Four programme called 'Sex and the Censors' to explain how he pulled off this little scam. Unfortunately, the programme makers chose to illustrate it with clips, and C4 got their knuckles rapped for screening obscenity during peak hours - the programme went out at 9pm, so the erection would have been visible at about 9.30. This was as much of a surprise to the people who made it as anyone else, as they were assuming a late-night post-midnight slot!)